Focusing on the price issue in shared parking, two auction-based pricing strategies are designed in a double environment covering parking suppliers and demanders. A novel uniform price strategy (UPS) is proposed to set unique transaction prices for winning participants, it is in contrast with the differential price strategy (DPS), which sets differential transaction prices. The DPS and UPS are compared from the perspective of parking platform’s payoff and participants’ utilities theoretically and numerically. It shows that the DPS is superior to the UPS in terms of parking platform’s payoff whilst the UPS outperforms the DPS in terms of participants’ utilities.

针对共享停车场的价格问题，在双重环境中设计了两种基于拍卖的定价策略，涵盖了停车场的供应商和需求者。提出了一种新颖的统一价格策略（UPS）来设置获胜参与者的唯一交易价格，这与差异价格策略（DPS）来设定差异交易价格相反。从停车平台的收益和参与者的效用的角度，从理论和数值上比较了DPS和UPS。结果表明，就停车平台的收益而言，DPS优于UPS，而就参与者的公用事业而言，UPS则优于DPS。