当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Behav. Brain. Sci.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
What are the appropriate axioms of rationality for reasoning under uncertainty with resource-constrained systems?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences ( IF 29.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-11 , DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x19001535 Harald Atmanspacher 1 , Irina Basieva 2 , Jerome R Busemeyer 3 , Andrei Y Khrennikov 4 , Emmanuel M Pothos 2 , Richard M Shiffrin 3 , Zheng Wang 5
Behavioral and Brain Sciences ( IF 29.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-11 , DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x19001535 Harald Atmanspacher 1 , Irina Basieva 2 , Jerome R Busemeyer 3 , Andrei Y Khrennikov 4 , Emmanuel M Pothos 2 , Richard M Shiffrin 3 , Zheng Wang 5
Affiliation
When constrained by limited resources, how do we choose axioms of rationality? The target article relies on Bayesian reasoning that encounter serioustractability problems. We propose another axiomatic foundation: quantum probability theory, which provides for less complex and more comprehensive descriptions. More generally, defining rationality in terms of axiomatic systems misses a key issue: rationality must be defined by humans facing vague information.
中文翻译:
在资源受限系统的不确定性下进行推理的适当合理性公理是什么?
在资源有限的情况下,我们如何选择理性公理?目标文章依赖于遇到严重的贝叶斯推理易处理性 问题。我们提出了另一个公理基础:量子概率论,它提供了不太复杂和更全面的描述。更一般地说,根据公理系统定义理性忽略了一个关键问题:理性必须由面临模糊信息的人类来定义。
更新日期:2020-03-11
中文翻译:
在资源受限系统的不确定性下进行推理的适当合理性公理是什么?
在资源有限的情况下,我们如何选择理性公理?目标文章依赖于遇到严重的贝叶斯推理