There are a number of overlapping themes in the target article by Graziano and colleagues (Graziano et al. 2020), such as a defense of their attention schema theory (or AST), how people’s understanding of consciousness is shaped by an implicit theory of mind, and discussion of related theories of consciousness.Onecentral claim is that “... thepresent social cognitive approachmay be able to bridge between AST, the globalworkspace theory (GW), thehigher-order thought theory (HOT), and the illusionist perspective” (p. 4). There is much that I agree with in the article but I’ll focus on a few critical points given the space limitations:

中文翻译：

---

“关于注意力图式理论的一些问题” 作者：Michael Graziano、Arvid Guterstam、Branden J. Bio 和 Andrew I. Wilterson

Graziano 及其同事（Graziano 等人，2020 年）的目标文章中有许多重叠的主题，例如为他们的注意力模式理论（或 AST）辩护，人们对意识的理解是如何被内隐的心智理论塑造的，以及相关意识理论的讨论。一个中心主张是“……目前的社会认知方法可能能够在 AST、全球工作空间理论 (GW)、高阶思维理论 (HOT) 和幻觉主义视角之间架起一座桥梁”（第 4 页）。文章中有很多我同意的地方，但鉴于篇幅限制，我将重点讨论几个关键点：