African American, European American, Mexican American, and Native American adolescents (N = 270) described how they felt and appraised their own actions in response to a peer's victimization. Analyses compared times they had calmed victim emotions, amplified anger, avenged, and resolved conflicts peacefully. Adolescents felt prouder, more helpful, more like a good friend, and expected more peer approval after calming and resolving than after amplifying anger or avenging peers. They also felt less guilt and shame after calming and resolving. Avenging elicited more positive self‐evaluation than amplifying. Epistemic network analyses explored links between self‐evaluative and other emotions. Pride was linked to relief after efforts to calm or resolve. Third‐party revenge reflected its antisocial and prosocial nature with connections between pride, relief, anger, and guilt.

中文翻译：

---

在同伴受害中的第三方干预：自我评估的情绪和对不同青少年样本的评估。

非裔美国人，欧洲裔美国人，墨西哥裔美国人和美洲原住民青少年（N = 270）描述了他们对同伴受害时的感受和评价自己的行为。分析比较了他们平息受害者情绪，激怒，报仇和和平解决冲突的时间。青少年感到自豪，更有帮助，更像是一个好朋友，并且在镇定和解决之后比在激怒或为同伴报仇之前，期望得到更多同伴的认可。在冷静和解决之后，他们也减少了内和羞愧。复仇引起的积极自我评价要多于放大。认知网络分析探讨了自我评价与其他情绪之间的联系。在努力使自己冷静或解决之后，骄傲与救济联系在一起。第三方报复反映了其在反社会和亲社会性质上与骄傲，救济，愤怒和内之间的联系。