The Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory (CMNI) has been an important tool in researching masculinity. With the original measure at 94 items (Mahalik et al., 2003), there have been several abbreviated forms developed from 11 to 55 items. However, in confirmatory factor analyses (CFA's) testing 13 common factors, bifactor, hierarchical, and unidimensional models, only 4 models demonstrated adequate fit to the data, and most of these were for the still quite long 46-item version. As a result, there was no psychometrically strong truly short form of the CMNI. In the present study, data from 1561 community and university men were used to develop a short form. First an exploratory factor analysis using a portion of the data was conducted, which resulted in a 10-subscale dimensionality, followed by CFA estimating a common factors model. The results of the CFA were used to create two candidate models for a 30-item short form of the CMNI, based on Classical test theory (CTT) and optimized CTT. The best-fitting candidate model for the CMNI-30 was CTT. Next, the fit of the 29, 46, and 94 item models were compared to the 30-item version, which had the superior fit. Then, measurement invariance between White men and men of color was assessed, choosing this comparison because hegemonic masculinity is theorized to marginalize men of color. Evidence was found for full configural and metric, and partial scalar and residuals invariance. Finally, significant relationships between CMNI-30 scores and indicators of depression and anxiety provides preliminary concurrent evidence for its validity. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

开发和评估新的简短形式的男性规范符合量表 (CMNI-30)。

男性规范符合量表（CMNI）一直是研究男性气质的重要工具。最初的衡量标准为 94 个项目（Mahalik 等人，2003 年），目前已开发出从 11 到 55 个项目的几种缩写形式。然而，在验证性因子分析 (CFA) 测试 13 个公共因子、双因子、分层和一维模型时，只有 4 个模型表现出与数据的充分拟合，并且其中大多数模型适用于仍然相当长的 46 项版本。因此，不存在心理测量学上强大的、真正简短的 CMNI 形式。在本研究中，来自 1561 名社区和大学男性的数据被用来制定一个简短的表格。首先使用部分数据进行探索性因素分析，得出 10 个子量表的维度，然后通过 CFA 估计共同因素模型。CFA 的结果用于基于经典测试理论 (CTT) 和优化的 CTT，为 CMNI 的 30 项简短形式创建两个候选模型。CMNI-30 最适合的候选模型是 CTT。接下来，将 29、46 和 94 项型号的合身性与 30 项版本进行比较，后者具有优异的合身性。然后，评估了白人男性和有色人种男性之间的测量不变性，选择这种比较是因为从理论上讲，霸权男性气质会边缘化有色人种男性。找到了完整配置和度量不变性以及部分标量和残差不变性的证据。最后，CMNI-30 分数与抑郁和焦虑指标之间的显着关系为其有效性提供了初步的同时证据。（PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA，保留所有权利）。