当前位置: X-MOL 学术History of Psychiatry › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The nature of love: Harlow, Bowlby and Bettelheim on affectionless mothers
History of Psychiatry ( IF 0.579 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-23 , DOI: 10.1177/0957154x19898997
Lenny van Rosmalen 1 , René van der Veer 2 , Frank Cp van der Horst 3
Affiliation  

Harry Harlow, famous for his experiments with rhesus monkeys and cloth and wire mothers, was visited by psychiatrist and psychoanalyst John Bowlby and by child psychologist Bruno Bettelheim in 1958. They made similar observations of Harlow's monkeys, yet their interpretations were strikingly different. Bettelheim saw Harlow's wire mother as a perfect example of the 'refrigerator mother', causing autism in her child, while Bowlby saw Harlow's results as an explanation of how socio-emotional development was dependent on responsiveness of the mother to the child's biological needs. Bettelheim's solution was to remove the mother, while Bowlby specifically wanted to involve her in treatment. Harlow was very critical of Bettelheim, but evaluated Bowlby's work positively.

中文翻译:

爱的本质:哈洛、鲍尔比和贝特尔海姆论无情的母亲

哈里·哈洛 (Harry Harlow) 因对恒河猴和布线母亲进行实验而闻名,1958 年,精神病学家和精神分析学家约翰·鲍尔比 (John Bowlby) 以及儿童心理学家布鲁诺·贝特尔海姆 (Bruno Bettelheim) 拜访了他。他们对哈洛的猴子进行了类似的观察,但他们的解释却截然不同。贝特尔海姆认为哈洛的电线母亲是“冰箱母亲”的完美例子,导致了她孩子的自闭症,而鲍尔比则认为哈洛的结果解释了社会情感发展如何依赖于母亲对孩子生物需求的反应。贝特尔海姆的解决方案是将母亲带走,而鲍尔比则特别想让她参与治疗。哈洛对贝特尔海姆非常批评,但对鲍尔比的工作给予积极评价。
更新日期:2020-01-23
down
wechat
bug