As sport and exercise medicine continues to establish itself as a fertile discipline for clinically relevant research, we are making discoveries across a broad spectrum of content—from the harmful effects of sitting to the best injury prevention protocols for elite athletes, and everything in between. There is one area that our community should pay more attention to: implementation. As more laboratory data roll in and theoretical frameworks roll out, we should ask ourselves the fundamental question, ‘Yes, but does it matter?’ Are we moving the needle on physical inactivity? Are we pushing the edges of sport, including who can and should participate? This issue has been curated by the Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine (CASEM) and we explore the answers to some of those questions. Wearables are becoming increasingly common, mining ever more detailed data for the user… but does it matter? O’Driscoll et al ( See page 332 ) of Leeds University explore how activity monitors stack up on estimating energy expenditure; among other findings, without heart rate sensors, large …

中文翻译：

---

重要的结果指标：探索运动和运动医学的优势

随着运动和运动医学逐渐成为临床相关研究的沃土学科，我们正在从广泛的内容中进行发现-从坐姿的有害影响到精英运动员的最佳伤害预防方案，以及介于两者之间的一切。我们的社区应该更加关注一个领域：实施。随着更多实验室数据的推出和理论框架的推出，我们应该问自己一个基本问题，“是的，但这有关系吗？” 我们是否正在朝着不运动的方向发展？我们是否在推动运动的前沿，包括谁可以参加？此问题已由加拿大运动与运动医学学院（CASEM）策划，我们将探讨其中一些问题的答案。可穿戴设备变得越来越普遍，为用户挖掘更详细的数据……但这有关系吗？利兹大学的O'Driscoll等人（请参见第332页）探讨了如何通过活动监控器来估算能源消耗。除其他发现外，没有心率传感器，大型…