Contrary to the assertion by Indigo Daya and colleagues that my commentary “…dismiss[es] the concerns of patients, advocates, and clinicians…”, it might provide the reader with a more balanced perspective. My actions in various leadership roles (along with many other psychiatrists internationally) have been clearly based on broad community consultation. Unashamedly, those actions have prioritised the concerns of individuals with lived experience, promoted access to evidence-based medical and psychological therapies, and encouraged serious investment in biomedical, psychological, and psychosocial research and service development.^{,  ,} 

中文翻译：

---

精神病学中的防御性言论：健康和人权的障碍-作者的答复。

与Indigo Daya及其同事的观点相反，我的评论“……消除了患者，拥护者和临床医生的关注……”，它可能会为读者提供一个更加平衡的观点。我担任各种领导职务（以及国际上许多其他精神科医生）的行动显然是基于广泛的社区咨询。毫无疑问，这些行动将具有经验的个人的关注列为优先事项，促进了获得循证医学和心理疗法的机会，并鼓励对生物医学，心理和社会心理研究与服务开发进行大量投资。^{，  ，}