Abstract The Tsunami-HySEA model is used to perform the five numerical benchmarks proposed in the “NTHMP/MMS Benchmarking Workshop: Tsunami currents”. Many different model configurations and sensitivity studies were performed for the different benchmarks, combining numerical methods of first, second, and third order, different friction laws, varying friction coefficients and numerical resolutions, or even different implementations of the boundary conditions. In this work, we include the three benchmark problems dealing with laboratory data, which are BP1 (truncated submerged circular cone), BP4 (Seaside, Oregon, city building model), and BP5 (solitary wave over a complex shelf). Benchmark 1 appeared to be the most difficult one of all for non-linear shallow water (NLSW) models due to its high sensitivity to parameters and the very complex wake structure occurring behind the submerged island. For the rest of the benchmark problems, a good fit was obtained with measured data. An initial version of the Tsunami-HySEA model implementing dispersion was used to reproduce BP4 and BP5. In the related paper Macias et al. (2020), the results corresponding to the two benchmarks dealing with field data that were proposed in the Benchmarking Workshop are described in detail.

中文翻译：

---

用于 NTHMP 海啸电流基准测试的海啸-HySEA 模型的性能评估。实验室数据

摘要 海啸-HySEA 模型用于执行“NTHMP/MMS 基准研讨会：海啸电流”中提出的五个数值基准。针对不同的基准进行了许多不同的模型配置和灵敏度研究，结合了一阶、二阶和三阶数值方法、不同的摩擦定律、不同的摩擦系数和数值分辨率，甚至边界条件的不同实现。在这项工作中，我们包括处理实验室数据的三个基准问题，它们是 BP1（截断水下圆锥体）、BP4（俄勒冈州海滨、城市建筑模型）和 BP5（复杂架子上的孤立波）。基准 1 似乎是非线性浅水 (NLSW) 模型中最困难的一个，因为它对参数具有高度敏感性，并且水下岛屿后面发生的尾流结构非常复杂。对于其余的基准问题，通过测量数据获得了良好的拟合。使用实施分散的海啸-HySEA 模型的初始版本来重现 BP4 和 BP5。在相关论文 Macias 等人。(2020)，详细描述了与基准研讨会中提出的处理现场数据的两个基准相对应的结果。在相关论文 Macias 等人。(2020)，详细描述了与基准研讨会中提出的处理现场数据的两个基准相对应的结果。在相关论文 Macias 等人。(2020)，详细描述了与基准研讨会中提出的处理现场数据的两个基准相对应的结果。