当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
PRRT neuroendocrine tumor response monitored using circulating transcript analysis: the NETest.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging ( IF 9.1 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-14 , DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04601-3
Lisa Bodei 1, 2 , Mark S Kidd 3 , Aviral Singh 4 , Wouter A van der Zwan 5 , Stefano Severi 6 , Ignat A Drozdov 3 , Anna Malczewska 7 , Richard P Baum 2, 4 , Dik J Kwekkeboom 2, 5 , Giovanni Paganelli 6 , Eric P Krenning 2, 5, 8 , Irvin M Modlin 2, 9
Affiliation  

Abstract

Purpose

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is effective for metastatic/inoperable neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Imaging response assessment is usually efficient subsequent to treatment completion. Blood biomarkers such as PRRT Predictive Quotient (PPQ) and NETest are effective in real-time. PPQ predicts PRRT efficacy; NETest monitors disease. We prospectively evaluated: (1) NETest as a surrogate biomarker for RECIST; (2) the correlation of NETest levels with PPQ prediction.

Methods

Three independent 177Lu-PRRT-treated GEP-NET and lung cohorts (Meldola, Italy: n = 72; Bad-Berka, Germany: n = 44; Rotterdam, Netherlands: n = 41). Treatment response: RECIST1.1 (responder (stable, partial, and complete response) vs non-responder). Blood sampling: pre-PRRT, before each cycle and follow-up (2–12 months). PPQ (positive/negative) and NETest (0–100 score) by PCR. Stable < 40; progressive > 40). CgA (ELISA) as comparator. Samples de-identified, measurement and analyses blinded. Kaplan–Meier survival and standard statistics.

Results

One hundred twenty-two of the 157 were evaluable. RECIST stabilization or response in 67%; 33% progressed. NETest significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased in RECIST “responders” (− 47 ± 3%); in “non-responders,” it remained increased (+ 79 ± 19%) (p < 0.0005). NETest monitoring accuracy was 98% (119/122). Follow-up levels > 40 (progressive) vs stable (< 40) significantly correlated with mPFS (not reached vs. 10 months; HR 0.04 (95%CI, 0.02–0.07).

PPQ response prediction was accurate in 118 (97%) with a 99% accurate positive and 93% accurate negative prediction. NETest significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased in PPQ-predicted responders (− 46 ± 3%) and remained elevated or increased in PPQ-predicted non-responders (+ 75 ± 19%). Follow-up NETest categories stable vs progressive significantly correlated with PPQ prediction and mPFS (not reached vs. 10 months; HR 0.06 (95%CI, 0.03–0.12).

CgA did not reflect PRRT treatment: in RECIST responders decrease in 38% and in non-responders 56% (p = NS).

Conclusions

PPQ predicts PRRT response in 97%. NETest accurately monitors PRRT response and is an effective surrogate marker of PRRT radiological response. NETest decrease identified responders and correlated (> 97%) with the pretreatment PPQ response predictor. CgA was non-informative.



中文翻译:

使用循环转录本分析监测PRRT神经内分泌肿瘤反应:NETest。

摘要

目的

肽受体放射性核素疗法(PRRT)对于转移性/无法手术的神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)有效。在完成治疗后,影像反应评估通常是有效的。诸如PRRT预测商(PPQ)和NETest的血液生物标记物是实时有效的。PPQ预测PRRT疗效;NETest监控疾病。我们进行了前瞻性评估:(1)NETest作为RECIST的替代生物标志物;(2)NETest水平与PPQ预测的相关性。

方法

三个独立的经过177次Lu-PRRT治疗的GEP-NET和肺部队列研究(意大利梅多拉:n = 72;德国巴德-贝卡:n = 44;荷兰鹿特丹:n = 41)。治疗反应:RECIST1.1(反应者(稳定,部分和完全反应)对比无反应者)。血液采样:PRRT前,每个周期之前和随访(2-12个月)。通过PCR检测PPQ(阳性/阴性)和NETest(0-100分)。稳定< 40; 渐进> 40)。CgA(ELISA)作为对照。样品鉴定失败,测量和分析不知情。Kaplan–Meier生存率和标准统计量。

结果

157个中的122个是可评估的。RECIST稳定或响应率达到67%;33%取得了进展。RECIST“响应者”的NETest显着降低(p <0.0001)(-47±3%);在“无反应者”中,其保持增加(+ 79±19%)(p <0.0005)。NETest监视准确性为98%(119/122)。随访水平> 40(进展)vs稳定(< 40)与mPFS显着相关(未达到vs. 10个月; HR 0.04(95%CI,0.02-0.07)。

PPQ反应预测在118个(97%)中是准确的,准确率为99%,阴性预测为93%。NETest在PPQ预测的应答者中显着降低(p <0.0001)(-46±3%),在PPQ预测的非应答者中保持升高或增加(+ 75±19%)。NETest类别稳定与进展的随访与PPQ预测和mPFS显着相关(未达到与10个月相比; HR为0.06(95%CI,0.03-0.12)。

CgA不能反映PRRT治疗:在RECIST中,有反应者下降38%,在无反应者中下降56%(p = NS)。

结论

PPQ预测PRRT响应率为97%。NETest可以准确地监测PRRT的反应,并且是PRRT放射学反应的有效替代指标。NETest减少可识别应答者,并与治疗前PPQ应答预测因子相关(> 97%)。CgA没有提供信息。

更新日期:2020-03-16
down
wechat
bug