The concept of Nature-based Solutions (NBS) has evolved as an umbrella concept embracing concepts such as Green/Blue/Nature Infrastructure, Ecosystem Approach, Ecosystem Services, but at their core, they cluster into the general theme of learning from and using nature to create sustainable socio-ecological systems, which enhance human well-being (HWB). NBS address societal challenges across a broad range of spatial scales—local, regional and global—and temporal scales—medium to long-term. While there are many reviews and a clear evidence base linking certain NBS to various elements of HWB, particularly urban greenspace and human health, no comprehensive mapping exists of the links between NBS interventions and the associated multiple positive and negative HWB outcomes across a range of habitats. The initial research phase used a participatory co-design process to select four priority societal challenges facing the United Kingdom: three related to management issues i.e. NBS cost-efficacy, governance in planning, environmental justice, and the fourth threats to the acoustic environment. These challenges collectively address priority management issues which stakeholders requested be investigated widely i.e. across landscapes, cityscapes, seascapes and soundscapes. Results of the study are intended to identify and define potential future environmental evidence challenges for UK science. This protocol describes the methodology for approaching the research question: What evidence is there for nature based solutions and their impacts on human wellbeing for societal challenges related to cost-efficacy, governance in planning, environmental justice, and the acoustic environment? Using systematic mapping, this study will search for and identify studies that seek to assess nature-based solutions on human well-being with regard to these four societal challenges. Systematic searches across a number of academic/online databases are tested against a number of test articles. Search results are refined using eligibility criteria through a three stage process: title, abstract, full text. Data from screened studies are extracted using a predefined coding strategy. Key trends in data will be synthesized according to a range of secondary questions and be presented in a graphical matrix illustrating the knowledge gaps and clusters for research into nature-based solutions and human well-being for each societal challenge.

中文翻译：

---

基于自然的解决方案如何对围绕英国人类福祉的优先社会挑战做出贡献：系统的地图协议

基于自然的解决方案（NBS）的概念已经发展成为一个涵盖了绿色/蓝色/自然基础设施，生态系统方法，生态系统服务等概念的保护伞概念，但在本质上，它们融入了学习和使用自然的总体主题。创建可持续的社会生态系统，从而改善人类福祉（HWB）。国家统计局应对中长期的广泛空间尺度（地方，区域和全球以及时间尺度）的社会挑战。尽管有许多评论和明确的证据基础将某些NBS与HWB的各个要素（尤其是城市绿地和人类健康）相关联，但在NBS干预措施与一系列生境范围内相关的多个正面和负面HWB结果之间的联系尚无全面的图。最初的研究阶段使用参与式协同设计过程来选择英国面临的四个优先社会挑战：三个与管理问题有关，即NBS成本效率，规划管理，环境正义以及对声环境的第四种威胁。这些挑战共同解决了利益相关者要求对优先管理问题进行广泛调查，即横跨景观，城市景观，海景和声景。研究结果旨在确定和定义英国科学未来潜在的环境证据挑战。该协议描述了用于解决以下研究问题的方法：基于自然的解决方案有哪些证据，以及它们对与成本效益，规划管理，环境正义和声学环境？这项研究将使用系统的制图方法，寻找并确定旨在评估这四个社会挑战的基于自然的人类福祉解决方案的研究。针对众多学术/在线数据库的系统搜索均针对大量测试文章进行了测试。通过三个阶段的过程，使用资格标准完善搜索结果：标题，摘要，全文。使用预定义的编码策略从筛选的研究中提取数据。数据的主要趋势将根据一系列次要问题进行综合，并以图形矩阵的形式显示，说明知识差距和集群，以研究基于自然的解决方案和应对每个社会挑战的人类福祉。这项研究将寻找并确定旨在评估针对这四个社会挑战的基于自然的人类福祉解决方案的研究。针对众多学术/在线数据库的系统搜索均针对大量测试文章进行了测试。通过三个阶段的过程，使用资格标准完善搜索结果：标题，摘要，全文。使用预定义的编码策略从筛选的研究中提取数据。数据的主要趋势将根据一系列次要问题进行综合，并以图形矩阵的形式显示，说明知识差距和集群，以研究基于自然的解决方案和应对每个社会挑战的人类福祉。这项研究将寻找并确定旨在评估针对这四个社会挑战的基于自然的人类福祉解决方案的研究。针对众多学术/在线数据库的系统搜索均针对大量测试文章进行了测试。通过三个阶段的过程，使用资格标准完善搜索结果：标题，摘要，全文。使用预定义的编码策略从筛选的研究中提取数据。数据的主要趋势将根据一系列次要问题进行综合，并以图形矩阵的形式显示，说明知识差距和集群，以研究基于自然的解决方案和应对每个社会挑战的人类福祉。