当前位置: X-MOL 学术Cognit. Tech. Work › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Psychological influences on drivers’ yielding behavior at the crosswalk of intersections
Cognition, Technology & Work ( IF 2.6 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-11 , DOI: 10.1007/s10111-019-00589-w
Bian Yang , Kun Liang , Xiaohua Zhao , Liping Yang , Weina Qu

Pedestrian safety is vital, especially when it comes to crossing at intersections. Setting pedestrian safety facilities is one of the solutions to provide a safer environment for pedestrians to cross at intersections. And most studies have focused on the influence of pedestrian safety facilities on drivers’ yielding behavior. Meanwhile, psychological factors underlying drivers’ decisions to yield to pedestrians have received little attention. The current study explored the relationship between drivers’ yielding behavior and psychological factors using a questionnaire mainly designed based on the extended theory of planned behavior (TPB). Measures of the questionnaire included elements of the theory of planned behavior model, risk perception part, new countermeasure, and traditional countermeasure. Pearson correlation test revealed that young drivers or highly educated drivers were more likely not to yield to pedestrians. Factors analysis proved the extended TPB questionnaire to be valid and reliable. Structural equation modeling showed that attitude (0.23), subjective norm (0.58), perceived behavioral control (0.21), and risk perception (0.38) significantly and directly influenced drivers’ yielding intentions. Traditional countermeasure (0.66) and new countermeasure (0.44) significantly influenced drivers’ risk perception and then influenced drivers’ yielding intentions indirectly. According to these findings, promotion and education on yielding behavior and on the functions of pedestrian safety facility were proposed.

中文翻译:

交叉路口人行横道驾驶员让行行为的心理影响

行人安全至关重要,尤其是在十字路口时。设置行人安全设施是为行人在交叉路口提供更安全环境的解决方案之一。大多数研究都集中在行人安全设施对驾驶员让行行为的影响上。与此同时,司机为行人让路的决定背后的心理因素很少受到关注。目前的研究使用主要基于计划行为扩展理论(TPB)设计的问卷,探讨了司机的让步行为与心理因素之间的关系。问卷的措施包括计划行为模型理论、风险感知部分、新对策、传统对策等要素。Pearson 相关性测试显示,年轻司机或受过高等教育的司机更有可能不让行人。因素分析证明扩展的TPB问卷是有效和可靠的。结构方程模型表明态度(0.23)、主观规范(0.58)、感知行为控制(0.21)和风险感知(0.38)显着并直接影响驾驶员的让步意图。传统对策(0.66)和新对策(0.44)显着影响驾驶员的风险感知,进而间接影响驾驶员的让步意愿。根据这些发现,提出了对让步行为和行人安全设施功能的宣传和教育。因素分析证明扩展的TPB问卷是有效和可靠的。结构方程模型表明态度(0.23)、主观规范(0.58)、感知行为控制(0.21)和风险感知(0.38)显着并直接影响驾驶员的让步意图。传统对策(0.66)和新对策(0.44)显着影响驾驶员的风险感知,进而间接影响驾驶员的让步意愿。根据这些发现,提出了对让步行为和行人安全设施功能的宣传和教育。因素分析证明扩展的TPB问卷是有效和可靠的。结构方程模型表明态度(0.23)、主观规范(0.58)、感知行为控制(0.21)和风险感知(0.38)显着并直接影响驾驶员的让步意图。传统对策(0.66)和新对策(0.44)显着影响驾驶员的风险感知,进而间接影响驾驶员的让步意愿。根据这些发现,提出了对让步行为和行人安全设施功能的宣传和教育。传统对策(0.66)和新对策(0.44)显着影响驾驶员的风险感知,进而间接影响驾驶员的让步意愿。根据这些发现,提出了对让步行为和行人安全设施功能的宣传和教育。传统对策(0.66)和新对策(0.44)显着影响驾驶员的风险感知,进而间接影响驾驶员的让步意愿。根据这些发现,提出了对让步行为和行人安全设施功能的宣传和教育。
更新日期:2019-09-11
down
wechat
bug