If, nowadays, the Communities’ welfare lies in new expressions of collaboration between different types of subjects for the achievement of common objectives, cultural consensus becomes the collective transformation tool to promote regeneration interventions of life contexts encouraged by new social innovation ideas such as products, services and models. This research considers five aspects of the social dimension to define energy systems location and their acceptability. In particular: social equity: as a fair distribution of costs and risks throughout society; spatial equity: as a fair distribution of risks and costs throughout the territory; intergenerational equity: as a proper assessment of the risks that would entail current locations for future generations; procedural equity: when the location decisions and the same decision making process are perceived as legitimate by all concerned; equity structural: when the localization process involves all aspects and interests, leaving no one out for their approaches (Murphy and Stanley 2006). In relation to the analyzed aspects, this study suggests a point of view on the role of reasoning and interpreting the social activity of individuals in relation to bottom-up decision-making processes for the formation of cultural consensus when changes in the usual life and environmental contexts occur.

中文翻译：

---

能源景观中的社会维度

如果说，如今社区的福利在于不同类型主体之间为实现共同目标而合作的新表现形式，那么文化共识就成为集体转型工具，以促进由新的社会创新理念（例如产品、服务和模型。本研究考虑了社会维度的五个方面来定义能源系统的位置及其可接受性。特别是： 社会公平：作为整个社会成本和风险的公平分配；空间公平：在整个领土内公平分配风险和成本；代际公平：作为对未来几代人当前所在地的风险的适当评估；程序公平：当所有相关方都认为选址决策和相同的决策过程是合法的时；股权结构：当本地化过程涉及所有方面和利益时，他们的方法没有任何人被排除（Murphy and Stanley 2006）。关于所分析的方面，本研究提出了一个观点，即当日常生活和环境发生变化时，推理和解释个人的社会活动与自下而上的决策过程有关的作用，以形成文化共识。上下文发生。