Abstract—

Constructive criticism of the provisions articulated in the article by A.G. Khanzhin and A.A. Kozhokaru’s “The problem of unifying the definitions of the concept of ‘information’” is given, and the potential and specificity of the usage of such tools of knowledge as Concepts and Categories are considered in the process. It is argued that obtaining knowledge about the essence of information, going beyond sectorial knowledge and relying on the postnonclassical scientific paradigm if necessary, remains the primary way of creating a definition of information. Essential definitions of the phenomena and concepts “information” and “information resources” are provided; approaches to the creation of other definitions of the conceptual and terminological apparatus of information science based on operating with classification attributes and carrying out the procedures of division, generalization, and restriction of concepts are outlined.

中文翻译：

---

通过识别本质来创建信息定义

摘要—

对AG Khanzhin和AA Kozhokaru在文章中提出的条款进行了建设性的批评，其中提出了“统一“信息”概念的定义的问题”，以及使用诸如概念和类别之类的知识工具的潜力和特殊性。在此过程中被考虑。有人认为，获得有关信息本质的知识，超越部门知识并在必要时依靠非经典后科学范式仍然是创建信息定义的主要方式。提供了现象和概念“信息”和“信息资源”的基本定义；