To generate solutions to multiple criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems that are satisfactory to the decision makers, this paper proposes a new method. To examine whether a group solution is satisfactory to the decision makers, group satisfaction is constructed from alternative assessment and ranking differences between the decision makers and the group. The difference between a decision maker's assessment and a group's assessment is designed based on differences in assessment grades, whose normalization is theoretically proven to construct alternative assessment differences. Inspired by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, the expected utilities of decision makers’ and the group's assessments are used to construct alternative ranking differences. An abstract two-variable function with specific properties is designed to relate alternative assessment difference to alternative ranking difference to form group satisfaction. From the constructed group satisfaction, the process of generating group-satisfactory solutions to MCGDM problems is presented. The problem of selecting engineering project management software is analyzed by using the proposed method to demonstrate its applicability. To highlight the importance of group satisfaction in MCGDM, relationships and differences between group satisfaction and group consensus are analyzed through the problem and simulation experiments.

为了针对决策者满意的多准则组决策（MCGDM）问题生成解决方案，本文提出了一种新方法。为了检查团队解决方案是否对决策者满意，可以通过替代评估和决策者与团队之间的排名差异来构建团队满意度。决策者评估与小组评估之间的差异是基于评估等级的差异而设计的，理论上证明了其归一化可以构造替代评估差异。受Spearman等级相关系数的启发，决策者和小组评估的预期效用用于构建替代等级差异。设计具有特定属性的抽象二变量函数，以将替代评估差异与替代排名差异相关联，以形成群体满意度。从构造的团队满意度出发，提出了生成针对MCGDM问题的团队满意度解决方案的过程。通过提出的方法对工程项目管理软件的选择问题进行了分析，证明了其适用性。为了强调小组满意度在MCGDM中的重要性，通过问题和模拟实验分析了小组满意度与小组共识之间的关系和差异。给出了生成针对MCGDM问题的组令人满意的解决方案的过程。通过提出的方法对工程项目管理软件的选择问题进行了分析，证明了其适用性。为了强调小组满意度在MCGDM中的重要性，通过问题和模拟实验分析了小组满意度与小组共识之间的关系和差异。给出了生成针对MCGDM问题的组令人满意的解决方案的过程。通过提出的方法对工程项目管理软件的选择问题进行了分析，证明了其适用性。为了强调小组满意度在MCGDM中的重要性，通过问题和模拟实验分析了小组满意度与小组共识之间的关系和差异。