当前位置: X-MOL 学术JAMA › 论文详情
Differences in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates Based on the Criteria Used to Count Central Line Days.
JAMA ( IF 45.540 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-14 , DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.18616
David Scheinker,Andrew Ward,Andrew Y Shin,Grace M Lee,Roshni Mathew,Lane F Donnelly

Central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates are an important quality performance indicator associated with patient morbidity, mortality, and increased costs. Hospital CLABSI rates are tracked, reported, and tied to reimbursement by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. This creates incentives for hospitals to reduce CLABSI rates with standardized best practices for the management of central lines.1,2 Between 2008 and 2017 the CLABSI standardized infection rate reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) fell by approximately 49% in acute care hospitals.3 The NHSN reporting guidelines specify 3 options for measuring the number of central line days: a once-a-day count at a fixed time for all patients with a central line; a sampling-based approximation to the once-a-day count; and an electronic count that may be used “after a validation of a minimum 3 consecutive months proves the data to be within 5% (+/–) of the manually collected once-a-day counts.”4 We evaluated the differences in CLABSI rates per 1000 central line days based on the choice of the time used for the once-a-day count and based on the use of electronic data collection.

更新日期:2020-01-14

 

全部期刊列表>>
施普林格自然
欢迎访问IOP中国网站
GIANT
自然科研线上培训服务
ACS ES&T Engineering
自然职场线上招聘会
ACS ES&T Water
产业、创新与基础设施
材料学研究精选
胸腔和胸部成像专题
屿渡论文,编辑服务
何川
苏昭铭
陈刚
姜涛
李闯创
北大
刘立明
隐藏1h前已浏览文章
课题组网站
新版X-MOL期刊搜索和高级搜索功能介绍
ACS材料视界
天合科研
x-mol收录
上海纽约大学
曾林
天津大学
何振宇
史大永
吉林大学
卓春祥
张昊
杨中悦
试剂库存
down
wechat
bug