Dodge (2020) provides a challenging and compelling formulation for more systematic determination of prevention component selection. The essay reminds us that population impact should be front and center in prevention specifically and public health organization in general. Dodge brings forth numerous issues in the science and the application of knowledge about prevention that warrant more research support and study. These issues include the need to recognize the existence of and increase the number of proven programs, the need for better and more extensive knowledge about impact variation across populations, and more attention to strengths and capabilities as guides for prevention. His essay also reminds us of the nuance and complexities in attempting to compare effect sizes and cost-benefit ratios of universal versus selective efforts. In addition, he provides compelling rationale for formalization of how prevention is organized and implemented in local community efforts. Further, in refocusing on the centrality of population effects in intervention application, Dodge also reminds us of the attendant principles of health equity and social justice in how we implement and judge the benefits of interventions. This essay provides a compelling argument for a strategy to realize the potential of the accumulating evidence of prevention as vital for addressing mental health and development.

中文翻译：

---

评论：能够有效，充分地应用预防策略以预防人口心理健康-对道奇（2020）的思考。

道奇（2020）为更具系统性地确定预防成分的选择提供了具有挑战性和令人信服的表述。这篇文章提醒我们，人口影响应特别在预防和整个公共卫生组织中处于中心位置。道奇（Dodge）在科学和关于预防的知识的应用方面提出了许多问题，这些问题需要更多的研究支持和研究。这些问题包括：需要认识到已存在的计划并增加计划的数目；需要更好，更广泛的知识，以了解不同人群之间的影响变化；需要更多地注意作为预防指南的优势和能力。他的文章还使我们想起了试图比较普遍努力与选择性努力的效果大小和成本效益比之间的细微差别和复杂性。此外，他提供了令人信服的理由，说明了在当地社区工作中如何组织和实施预防工作。此外，在重新关注人口效应在干预措施应用中的中心地位时，道奇还提醒我们有关如何实施和判断干预措施收益的健康公平和社会正义原则。本文提出了一种令人信服的论点，提出了一种战略，以认识到积累的预防证据对解决心理健康和发展至关重要。在我们如何实施和判断干预措施的收益时，道奇还使我们想起了健康平等和社会正义的伴随原则。本文提出了一种令人信服的论点，提出了一种战略，以认识到积累的预防证据对解决心理健康和发展至关重要。在我们如何实施和判断干预措施的收益时，道奇还使我们想起了健康平等和社会正义的伴随原则。本文提出了一种令人信服的论点，提出了一种战略，以认识到积累的预防证据对解决心理健康和发展至关重要。