当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sleep Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Daytime sleep state misperception in a tertiary sleep centre population.
Sleep Medicine ( IF 4.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-10 , DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.12.026
M S Schinkelshoek 1 , K de Wit 2 , V Bruggink 2 , R Fronczek 1 , G J Lammers 1
Affiliation  

STUDY OBJECTIVES Sleep state misperception is common in various sleep disorders, especially in chronic insomnia with a prevalence ranging between 9-50%. Most prior studies used nocturnal polysomnography (PSG) for the identification of sleep state misperception during nighttime. Our objective was to assess sleep state misperception during daytime in people with sleep disorders with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). METHODS In this prospective observational study, we assessed the occurrence of, and factors influencing sleep state misperception in consecutive patients undergoing a routine multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) in a tertiary sleep-wake centre included between 2014 and 2017. Mixed models were applied to assess the influence of patients' clinical data on sleep state perception. RESULTS People with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1, n = 33) and type 2 (NT2, n = 14), idiopathic hypersomnia (IH, n = 56), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA, n = 31) and insufficient sleep syndrome (ISS, n = 31) were included. The prevalence of both classical and reverse sleep state misperception did not differ between the sleep disorders (mean 25%, range 8-37%) after correction for sleep stage, sleep onset latency and age. Longer sleep onset latency and reaching only non-rapid eye movement (REM) sleep stage 1 were significant predictors for classical sleep state misperception. CONCLUSIONS Sleep state misperception is common in people with NT1 and NT2, IH, OSA, and ISS. Classical sleep state misperception is more frequent in patients with longer sleep onset latencies who only reach non-REM sleep stage 1 during a nap.

中文翻译:

三级睡眠中心人口的白天睡眠状态误解。

研究目的睡眠状态错误感知在各种睡眠障碍中都很常见,尤其是在慢性失眠中,患病率介于9%至50%之间。大多数先前的研究使用夜间多导睡眠图(PSG)来识别夜间的睡眠状态误解。我们的目标是评估白天过度嗜睡(EDS)的睡眠障碍患者白天的睡眠状态误解。方法在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,我们评估了2014年至2017年间在三级睡眠-唤醒中心接受常规多次睡眠潜伏期测试(MSLT)的连续患者中发生睡眠状态错误知觉的因素及影响其睡眠状态的因素。将混合模型应用于评估患者临床数据对睡眠状态感知的影响。结果患有发作性睡病1型(NT1,n = 33)和2型(NT2,n = 14),特发性失眠(IH,n = 56),阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA,n = 31)和睡眠不足综合征(ISS,n = 31)。校正睡眠阶段,睡眠发作潜伏期和年龄后,经典的睡眠状态和逆向睡眠状态的误觉发生率在睡眠障碍之间无差异(平均25%,范围8-37%)。较长的睡眠发作潜伏期和仅达到非快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段1是经典睡眠状态误解的重要预测因子。结论睡眠状态误觉在NT1和NT2,IH,OSA和ISS患者中很常见。在睡眠时间较长的患者中,午睡期间仅达到非快速眼动睡眠阶段1的患者,经典的睡眠状态误解更为常见。包括阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA,n = 31)和睡眠不足综合征(ISS,n = 31)。校正睡眠阶段,睡眠发作潜伏期和年龄后,经典的睡眠状态和逆向睡眠状态的误觉发生率在睡眠障碍之间无差异(平均25%,范围8-37%)。较长的睡眠发作潜伏期和仅达到非快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段1是经典睡眠状态误解的重要预测因子。结论睡眠状态误解在NT1和NT2,IH,OSA和ISS患者中很常见。在睡眠时间较长的患者中,午睡期间仅达到非快速眼动睡眠阶段1的患者,经典的睡眠状态误解更为常见。包括阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA,n = 31)和睡眠不足综合征(ISS,n = 31)。校正睡眠阶段,睡眠发作潜伏期和年龄后,经典的睡眠状态和逆向睡眠状态的知觉发生率在睡眠障碍之间无差异(平均25%,范围8-37%)。较长的睡眠发作潜伏期和仅达到非快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段1是经典睡眠状态误解的重要预测因子。结论睡眠状态误觉在NT1和NT2,IH,OSA和ISS患者中很常见。在睡眠时间较长的患者中,午睡期间仅达到非快速眼动睡眠阶段1的患者,经典的睡眠状态误解更为常见。校正睡眠阶段,睡眠发作潜伏期和年龄后,经典的睡眠状态和逆向睡眠状态的误觉发生率在睡眠障碍之间无差异(平均25%,范围8-37%)。较长的睡眠发作潜伏期和仅达到非快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段1是经典睡眠状态误解的重要预测因子。结论睡眠状态误觉在NT1和NT2,IH,OSA和ISS患者中很常见。在睡眠时间较长的患者中,午睡期间仅达到非快速眼动睡眠阶段1的患者,经典的睡眠状态误解更为常见。校正睡眠阶段,睡眠发作潜伏期和年龄后,经典的睡眠状态和逆向睡眠状态的误觉发生率在睡眠障碍之间无差异(平均25%,范围8-37%)。较长的睡眠发作潜伏期和仅达到非快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段1是经典睡眠状态误解的重要预测因子。结论睡眠状态误觉在NT1和NT2,IH,OSA和ISS患者中很常见。在睡眠时间较长的患者中,午睡期间仅达到非快速眼动睡眠阶段1的患者,经典的睡眠状态误解更为常见。较长的睡眠发作潜伏期和仅达到非快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段1是经典睡眠状态误解的重要预测因子。结论睡眠状态误觉在NT1和NT2,IH,OSA和ISS患者中很常见。在睡眠时间较长的患者中,午睡期间仅达到非快速眼动睡眠阶段1的患者,经典的睡眠状态误解更为常见。较长的睡眠发作潜伏期和仅达到非快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段1是经典睡眠状态误解的重要预测因子。结论睡眠状态误觉在NT1和NT2,IH,OSA和ISS患者中很常见。在睡眠时间较长的患者中,午睡期间仅达到非快速眼动睡眠阶段1的患者,经典的睡眠状态误解更为常见。
更新日期:2020-01-11
down
wechat
bug