BACKGROUND This study has two aims: first, to identify variables associated with interprofessional collaboration (IPC) among a total of 315 Quebec mental health (MH) professionals working in MH primary care teams (PCTs, N = 101) or in specialized service teams (SSTs, N = 214); and second, to compare IPC associated variables in MH-PCTs vs MH-SSTs. METHODS A large number of variables acknowledged as strongly related to IPC in the literature were tested. Multivariate regression models were performed on MH-PCTs and MH-SSTs respectively. RESULTS Results showed that knowledge integration, team climate and multifocal identification were independently and positively associated with IPC in both MH-PCTs and MH-SSTs. By contrast, knowledge sharing was positively associated with IPC in MH-PCTs only, and organizational support positively associated with IPC in MH-SSTs. Finally, one variable (age) was significantly and negatively associated with IPC in SSTs. CONCLUSIONS Improving IPC and making MH teams more successful require the development and implementation of differentiated professional skills in MH-PCTs and MH-SSTs by care managers depending upon the level of care required (primary or specialized). Training is also needed for the promotion of interdisciplinary values and improvement of interprofessional knowledge regarding IPC.

中文翻译：

---

专业间协作相关的变量：初级医疗保健团队和专业心理健康团队之间的比较。

背景技术这项研究有两个目的：首先，在MH基层医疗团队（PCT，N = 101）或专业服务团队（PCT）中工作的315名魁北克精神卫生（MH）专业人士中，确定与专业间合作（IPC）相关的变量。 SST，N = 214）；第二，比较MH-PCT与MH-SST中IPC相关的变量。方法对文献中被认为与IPC密切相关的大量变量进行了测试。分别对MH-PCT和MH-SST进行了多元回归模型。结果结果表明，在MH-PCT和MH-SST中，知识整合，团队氛围和多焦点识别与IPC独立且呈正相关。相比之下，知识共享仅与MH-PCT中的IPC正相关，与MH-SST中IPC积极相关的组织支持。最后，一个变量（年龄）与SST中的IPC显着负相关。结论改善IPC和使MH团队更成功需要护理经理根据所需的护理级别（主要或专业）来开发和实施MH-PCT和MH-SST中的差异化专业技能。还需要培训以提高跨学科的价值并提高有关IPC的专业知识。结论改善IPC和使MH团队更成功需要护理经理根据所需的护理级别（主要或专业）来开发和实施MH-PCT和MH-SST中的差异化专业技能。还需要培训以提高跨学科的价值并提高有关IPC的专业知识。结论改善IPC和使MH团队更成功需要护理经理根据所需的护理级别（主要或专业）来开发和实施MH-PCT和MH-SST中的差异化专业技能。还需要培训以提高跨学科的价值并提高有关IPC的专业知识。