当前位置: X-MOL 学术Can. J. Agric. Econ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Agriculture in the United States, Mexico, Canada Agreement: Agreeing to keep things pretty much the same
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics ( IF 9 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-20 , DOI: 10.1111/cjag.12212
William A. Kerr 1
Affiliation  

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was referred to by U.S. President Trump as one of the worst trade deals ever made. Given this billing, one might have expected the result of its renegotiation to be a major change to the trading relationship between the United States and Canada. The new United States, Mexico, Canada Agreement (USMCA), however, retains a great deal of its predecessor. This is particularly true for agricultural trade. Canadian market access into the United States remains virtually unchanged. No major domestic regulatory changes were agreed to by Canada. While there were concessions made on market access for U.S. products into Canada's heavily protected sectors where the supply management policy applies, they do not appear to threaten the system. While the value of the compensation has not yet been announced, compensation for losses that will be suffered by farmers producing under supply management is agreed in principle. The USMCA is an agreement to keep things pretty much the same.

中文翻译:

美国,墨西哥和加拿大的农业协议:同意保持几乎相同的状态

北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)被美国总统特朗普称为有史以来最糟糕的贸易协议之一。有了这个账单,人们可能已经预期重新谈判的结果将是美国和加拿大之间贸易关系的重大变化。但是,新的《美国,墨西哥,加拿大协定》(USMCA)保留了其前任的大部分内容。对于农业贸易尤其如此。加拿大进入美国的市场准入几乎保持不变。加拿大未同意国内重大监管变化。尽管对美国产品进入适用加拿大的受严格保护的部门的市场准入做出了一些让步,在这些部门中采用了供应管理政策,但它们似乎并未威胁到该体系。虽然补偿金额尚未公布,原则上同意对在供应管理下生产的农民所遭受的损失进行赔偿。USMCA是一项协议,旨在使事情保持大致相同。
更新日期:2019-11-20
down
wechat
bug