当前位置: X-MOL 学术Qual. Life Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A systematic scoping review of oral health models.
Quality of Life Research ( IF 3.5 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-19 , DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02206-9
Stella Sekulic 1, 2, 3 , Nicole Theis-Mahon 4 , Ksenija Rener-Sitar 2, 5
Affiliation  

PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to identify, analyze, and compare existing generic oral health models in English scientific dental literature. METHODS We conducted a literature search in five databases, Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Web of Science, using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria and calculated the interrater agreement coefficient "prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa" (PABAK). We identified, reviewed, and displayed the generic oral health models in review tables. RESULTS Of the 3498 references identified, 13 oral health models from seven countries met the inclusion criteria. The interrater agreement coefficient resulted in a ''substantial agreement'' (PABAK = 0.80). Ten of the 13 (77%) generic oral health models were developed in English-speaking countries. All models were multidimensional and contained from two to 12 dimensions. Four models presented linear conception, and we observed non-linear conception in six models. Authors presented the unidirectional or reciprocal relations between dimensions in six models, and five models, respectively. Two models did not show models' relation or conception. Researchers used only experts (N = 1), literature (N = 2), dental patients (N = 2), or general population subjects (N = 3), or a combination of these sources (N = 5) for development of their generic oral health models. Statistical analyses supported the majority of the models (N = 8). CONCLUSIONS The identified 13 oral health models vary substantially in their characteristics. This systematic scoping review of generic oral health models provides a toolbox, from which dental researchers can choose the theoretical model they consider fit best their oral health concept they want to investigate. Ideally, the international dental community will come soon to an agreement of accepting one oral health model, and this will provide an opportunity for comparison of outcomes across studies and populations and thus elevate dentistry to a higher evidence-based level.

中文翻译:

口腔健康模型的系统范围界定审查。

目的本系统范围界定研究的目的是识别,分析和比较英语科学牙科文献中现有的通用口腔健康模型。方法我们使用预先确定的纳入和排除标准,在五个数据库(Ovid Medline,Embase,PsycINFO,Cochrane和Web of Science)中进行了文献检索,并计算了跨界一致性系数“流行度调整后的偏差调整过的κ”(PABAK) 。我们在检查表中确定,检查并显示了常规口腔健康模型。结果在确定的3498篇参考文献中,来自七个国家的13种口腔健康模型符合纳入标准。相互同意系数导致“实质一致”(PABAK = 0.80)。在13个通用口腔健康模型中,有10个(77%)是在英语国家开发的。所有模型都是多维的,包含二维到12维。四个模型提出了线性概念,我们在六个模型中观察到了非线性概念。作者分别介绍了六个模型和五个模型中尺寸之间的单向或倒数关系。两个模型没有显示模型的关系或概念。研究人员仅使用专家(N = 1),文献(N = 2),牙科患者(N = 2)或普通人群(N = 3)或这些来源的组合(N = 5)来发展他们的通用口腔健康模型。统计分析支持大多数模型(N = 8)。结论所确定的13种口腔健康模型的特征差异很大。通用口腔健康模型的系统范围界定审查提供了一个工具箱,牙科研究人员可以从中选择他们认为最适合他们要研究的口腔健康概念的理论模型。理想情况下,国际牙科界将很快就接受一种口腔健康模型达成协议,这将为比较研究和人群的结果提供机会,从而将牙科提升到更高的循证水平。
更新日期:2019-05-17
down
wechat
bug