当前位置: X-MOL 学术Behav. Neurosci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Child gender influences paternal behavior, language, and brain function.
Behavioral Neuroscience ( IF 1.9 ) Pub Date : 2017-5-26 , DOI: 10.1037/bne0000199
Jennifer S Mascaro 1 , Kelly E Rentscher 2 , Patrick D Hackett 3 , Matthias R Mehl 2 , James K Rilling 4
Affiliation  

Multiple lines of research indicate that fathers often treat boys and girls differently in ways that impact child outcomes. The complex picture that has emerged, however, is obscured by methodological challenges inherent to the study of parental caregiving, and no studies to date have examined the possibility that gender differences in observed real-world paternal behavior are related to differential paternal brain responses to male and female children. Here we compare fathers of daughters and fathers of sons in terms of naturalistically observed everyday caregiving behavior and neural responses to child picture stimuli. Compared with fathers of sons, fathers of daughters were more attentively engaged with their daughters, sang more to their daughters, used more analytical language and language related to sadness and the body with their daughters, and had a stronger neural response to their daughter's happy facial expressions in areas of the brain important for reward and emotion regulation (medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex [OFC]). In contrast, fathers of sons engaged in more rough and tumble play (RTP), used more achievement language with their sons, and had a stronger neural response to their son's neutral facial expressions in the medial OFC (mOFC). Whereas the mOFC response to happy faces was negatively related to RTP, the mOFC response to neutral faces was positively related to RTP, specifically for fathers of boys. These results indicate that real-world paternal behavior and brain function differ as a function of child gender. (PsycINFO Database Record

中文翻译:

儿童性别会影响父亲的行为,语言和大脑功能。

多方面的研究表明,父亲常常以影响孩子成果的方式对待男孩和女孩。然而,已经出现的复杂情况被父母照料研究固有的方法论难题所掩盖,迄今为止,尚无研究检查现实世界中父亲行为中的性别差异与父亲对男性的差异反应有关的可能性。和女童。在这里,我们从自然观察到的日常照料行为和对儿童图片刺激的神经反应方面比较女儿的父亲和儿子的父亲。与儿子的父亲相比,女儿的父亲更专心地与女儿交往,对女儿唱歌更多,对女儿使用更多的分析性语言和与悲伤和身体有关的语言,并且对女儿的在奖励和情感调节(内侧和外侧眶额皮质[OFC])重要的大脑区域的快乐表情产生了更强烈的神经反应。相比之下,儿子的父亲从事更粗暴的玩耍(RTP),与儿子一起使用更多的成就语言,并且对内侧OFC(mOFC)的儿子中性面部表情有更强的神经反应。mOFC对笑脸的反应与RTP呈负相关,而mOFC对中性面孔的反应与RTP呈正相关,特别是对于男孩的父亲。这些结果表明,现实世界中的父亲行为和脑功能因儿童性别而异。(PsycINFO数据库记录 在奖励和情感调节(内侧和外侧眶额皮质[OFC])中很重要的大脑区域中的快乐面部表情。相比之下,儿子的父亲从事更粗暴的玩耍(RTP),与儿子一起使用更多的成就语言,并且对内侧OFC(mOFC)的儿子中性面部表情有更强的神经反应。mOFC对笑脸的反应与RTP呈负相关,而mOFC对中性面孔的反应与RTP呈正相关,特别是对于男孩的父亲。这些结果表明,现实世界中的父亲行为和脑功能因儿童性别而异。(PsycINFO数据库记录 在奖励和情感调节(内侧和外侧眶额皮质[OFC])中很重要的大脑区域中的快乐面部表情。相比之下,儿子的父亲从事更粗暴的玩耍(RTP),与儿子一起使用更多的成就语言,并且对内侧OFC(mOFC)的儿子中性面部表情有更强的神经反应。mOFC对笑脸的反应与RTP呈负相关,而mOFC对中性面孔的反应与RTP呈正相关,特别是对于男孩的父亲。这些结果表明,现实世界中的父亲行为和脑功能因儿童性别而异。(PsycINFO数据库记录 与儿子一起使用更多的成就语言,并且对内侧OFC(mOFC)中儿子中性的面部表情有更强的神经反应。mOFC对笑脸的反应与RTP呈负相关,而mOFC对中性面孔的反应与RTP呈正相关,特别是对于男孩的父亲。这些结果表明,现实世界中的父亲行为和脑功能因儿童性别而异。(PsycINFO数据库记录 与儿子一起使用更多的成就语言,并且对内侧OFC(mOFC)中儿子中性的面部表情有更强的神经反应。mOFC对笑脸的反应与RTP呈负相关,而mOFC对中性面孔的反应与RTP呈正相关,特别是对于男孩的父亲。这些结果表明,现实世界中的父亲行为和脑功能因儿童性别而异。(PsycINFO数据库记录 这些结果表明,现实世界中的父亲行为和脑功能因儿童性别而异。(PsycINFO数据库记录 这些结果表明,现实世界中的父亲行为和脑功能因儿童性别而异。(PsycINFO数据库记录
更新日期:2020-08-21
down
wechat
bug