当前位置: X-MOL 学术Neuropsychol. Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Rohling's Interpretive Method and inherent limitations on the flexibility of "flexible batteries".
Neuropsychology Review ( IF 5.8 ) Pub Date : 2005-01-28 , DOI: 10.1023/b:nerv.0000048183.29813.15
Barton W Palmer 1 , Mark I Appelbaum , Robert K Heaton
Affiliation  

Miller and Rohling (2001) proposed a 24-step algorithm, the Rohling Interpretive Method (RIM), for quantitative interpretation of results from flexible neuropsychological test batteries. We believe that the RIM as presented in that paper has several conceptual problems, including (a) a failure to distinguish "statistically significant" from pathological differences, (b) an assumption that declines in specific abilities can be inferred when a particular test score deviates from an estimate of general premorbid ability, and (c) confusion between the standard deviation associated with individual test scores versus that of a composite of those scores. As an alternative, we suggest the value of developing and using co-normed comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries from which test users might select subsets of tests.

中文翻译:

Rohling的解释方法以及对“柔性电池”灵活性的固有限制。

Miller和Rohling(2001)提出了一种24步算法,即Rohling解释法(RIM),用于对柔性神经心理学测试电池的结果进行定量解释。我们认为,该论文中提出的RIM存在几个概念性问题,包括(a)无法区分“统计学上显着的”与病理学上的差异,(b)假设当特定考试成绩偏离时,可以推断出特定能力的下降。从一般病前能力的估计,以及(c)与个别测试成绩相关的标准偏差与这些成绩的综合标准偏差之间的混淆。作为替代方案,我们建议开发和使用共同规范的综合神经心理学测试电池的价值,测试用户可以从中选择测试的子集。
更新日期:2019-11-01
down
wechat
bug