Ardila (Neuropsychol. Rev. 12: 3, 2002) criticizes the Policy Statement from the Houston Conference on Specialty Education and Training in Clinical Neuropsychology (Hannay et al., Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 13: 157-250, 1998) as possessing deficiencies in the training of clinical neuropsychologists in three fundamental knowledge areas: the history of the discipline, neuropsychological syndromes, and neuropsychological theory. These problems are seen here as a result of a more pervasive problem associated with the Houston Conference training model's emphasis on technical skill over science and the attempt to micromanage the training of the clinical neuropsychologist at the administrative level.

中文翻译：

---

关于休斯敦会议政策​​声明的一篇文章：静态但尚未完成或正在进行中？

Ardila（Neuropsychol。Rev. 12：3，2002）批评了休斯顿临床神经心理学专业教育和培训会议的政策声明（Hannay等，Arch。Clin。Neuropsychol。13：157-250，1998）在三个基本知识领域中，临床神经心理学家的培训存在缺陷：学科历史，神经心理学综合症和神经心理学理论。这些问题在这里被视为是与休斯顿会议培训模型强调技术而非科学有关的更普遍问题以及试图在管理层面对临床神经心理学家的培训进行微观管理的结果。