Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Definition of professionalism and tools for assessing professionalism in pharmacy practice: a systemic review
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions Pub Date : 2019-08-21 , DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.22
Huda Dubbai 1 , Barbara-Ann Adelstein 2 , Silas Taylor 1 , Boaz Shulruf 1, 3
Affiliation  

Purpose In contemporary pharmacy, the role of pharmacists has become more multifaceted, as they now handle a wider range of tasks and take more responsibility for providing patient care than 20 years ago. This evolution in pharmacists’ responsibilities has been accompanied by the need for pharmacists to display high-quality patient-centred care and counselling, and to demonstrate professionalism, which now needs to be taught and assessed as part of pharmacy education and practice. This study aimed at identifying definitions of professionalism in pharmacy practice and critically evaluating published instruments for assessing professionalism in pharmacy practice. Methods We searched the medical literature listed in Scopus, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2018. All papers meeting our selection criteria were reviewed and summarised into a clear review of professionalism requirements in pharmacy practice. Details of the instruments measuring professionalism were reviewed in detail. Results There is no accepted simple definition of professionalism, although we identified several theoretical and policy frameworks required for professional pharmaceutical practice. We identified 4 instruments (the Behavioural Professionalism Assessment Instrument, Lerkiatbundit’s instrument, the Pharmacy Professionalism Instrument, and the Professionalism Assessment Tool that build on these frameworks and measure professional practice in pharmacy students. These were found to be reliable and valid, but had only been used and tested in student populations. Conclusion Given the increasingly broad role of community pharmacists, there is a need for assessments of professionalism in practice. Professionalism is a complex concept that is challenging to measure because it has no standardised definition and the existing literature related to the topic is limited. Currently available instruments focus on measuring the development of the elements of professionalism among pharmacy students, rather than pharmacists.

中文翻译:

专业性的定义和药学实践中评估专业性的工具:系统评价

目的在当代药学中,药剂师的角色已变得更加多元化,因为与20年前相比,如今他们处理更广泛的任务并承担着提供病人护理的更多责任。药剂师职责的这种发展伴随着药剂师对展示高质量的以患者为中心的护理和咨询以及展现专业水平的需要,而现在,这需要作为药学教育和实践的一部分进行教学和评估。这项研究旨在确定药房实践中的职业素养的定义,并严格评估出版的评估药房实践中的职业素养的手段。方法我们检索了2000年1月1日至2018年12月31日在Scopus,MEDLINE和PsycINFO数据库中列出的医学文献。所有符合我们入选标准的论文均经过审查并总结为对药学实践中专业要求的清晰审查。测量专业性的工具的详细信息进行了详细审查。结果尽管我们确定了专​​业药学实践所需的几个理论和政策框架,但没有公认的简单的专业定义。我们确定了4种工具(行为专业评估工具,Lerkiatbundit的工具,药房专业性工具和专业性评估工具),这些工具建立在这些框架上并衡量了药房学生的专业实践,被认为是可靠和有效的,但仅在在学生群体中使用和测试结论结论鉴于社区药剂师的作用越来越广泛,在实践中需要对专业水平进行评估。专业精神是一个很难衡量的复杂概念,因为它没有标准化的定义,并且与该主题相关的现有文献有限。当前可用的工具侧重于衡量药学专业学生而不是药剂师专业水平的发展。
更新日期:2019-08-21
down
wechat
bug