In the online supplementary materials associated with this article, the “swap rate” was calculated incorrectly for Analysis S1 and Table S3. Correction of this error slightly changed the average swap rate for each response (corrected Table S3). However, the core conclusion of this analysis is the same; swaps did not increase monotonically as a function of response number (corrected Analysis S1). The corrected supplementary analyses are shown below and are available on the article’s Open Science Framework page (https://osf.io/kjpnk/). We would like to thank Sebastian Schneegans for alerting us to the error in our original analysis.

中文翻译：

---

更正“视觉工作记忆中项目限制的明确证据”[Cogn. 心理学。97 (2017) 79–97]

在与本文相关的在线补充材料中，分析 S1 和表 S3 的“交换率”计算错误。对此错误的更正略微改变了每个响应的平均交换率（更正的表 S3）。但是，这个分析的核心结论是一样的；掉期没有作为响应数的函数单调增加（更正的分析 S1）。修正后的补充分析如下所示，可在文章的开放科学框架页面 (https://osf.io/kjpnk/) 上找到。我们要感谢 Sebastian Schneegans 提醒我们注意原始分析中的错误。