当前位置: X-MOL 学术Cognit. Comput. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Introduction to the fractality principle of consciousness and the sentyon postulate.
Cognitive Computation ( IF 5.4 ) Pub Date : 2011-07-27 , DOI: 10.1007/s12559-011-9104-5
Erhard Bieberich 1
Affiliation  

Recently, consciousness research has gained much attention. Indeed, the question at stake is significant: Why is the brain not just a computing device, but generates a perception from within? Ambitious endeavors trying to simulate the entire human brain assume that the algorithm will do the trick: as soon as we assemble the brain in a computer and increase the number of operations per time, consciousness will emerge by itself. I disagree with this simplistic representation. My argument emerges from the “atomism paradox”: the irreducible space of the consciously perceived world, the endospace is incompatible with the reducible and decomposable architecture of the brain or a computer. I will first discuss the fundamental challenges in current consciousness models and then propose a new model based on the fractality principle: “the whole is in each of its parts.” This new model copes with the atomism paradox by implementing an iterative mapping of information from higher-order brain structures to smaller scales on the cellular and molecular level, which I will refer to as “fractalization.” This information fractalization gives rise to a new form of matter that is conscious (“bright matter”). Bright matter is composed of conscious particles or units named “sentyons.” The internal fractality of these sentyons will close a loop (the “psychic loop”) in a recurrent fractal neural network (RFNN) that allows for continuous and complete information transformation and sharing between higher-order brain structures and the endpoint substrate of consciousness at the molecular level.

中文翻译:

介绍意识的分形原理和哨兵假设。

近年来,意识研究备受关注。事实上,关键的问题很重要:为什么大脑不仅仅是一个计算设备,而是从内部产生感知?试图模拟整个人类大脑的雄心勃勃的努力假设该算法会成功:一旦我们将大脑组装到计算机中并增加每次操作的次数,意识就会自动出现。我不同意这种简单化的表述。我的论点来自“原子论悖论”:有意识感知世界的不可简化空间,内空间与大脑或计算机的可简化和可分解架构不相容。我将首先讨论当前意识模型中的基本挑战,然后提出一个基于分形原理的新模型:“整体在于它的每个部分。” 这种新模型通过在细胞和分子水平上将信息从高阶大脑结构迭代映射到较小尺度来应对原子论悖论,我将其称为“分形化”。这种信息分形产生了一种新的有意识物质形式(“亮物质”)。明亮的物质由有意识的粒子或称为“哨兵”的单位组成。这些哨兵的内部分形将在循环分形神经网络 (RFNN) 中关闭一个循环(“心理循环”),该网络允许在更高阶的大脑结构和意识的终点基板之间进行连续和完整的信息转换和共享。分子水平。” 这种新模型通过在细胞和分子水平上实现从高阶大脑结构到较小尺度的信息的迭代映射来应对原子论悖论,我将其称为“分形化”。这种信息分形产生了一种新的有意识物质形式(“亮物质”)。明亮的物质由有意识的粒子或称为“哨兵”的单位组成。这些哨兵的内部分形将在循环分形神经网络 (RFNN) 中关闭一个循环(“心理循环”),该网络允许在更高阶的大脑结构和意识的终点基板之间进行连续和完整的信息转换和共享。分子水平。” 这种新模型通过在细胞和分子水平上实现从高阶大脑结构到较小尺度的信息的迭代映射来应对原子论悖论,我将其称为“分形化”。这种信息分形产生了一种新的有意识物质形式(“亮物质”)。明亮的物质由有意识的粒子或称为“哨兵”的单位组成。这些哨兵的内部分形将在循环分形神经网络 (RFNN) 中关闭一个循环(“心理循环”),该网络允许在更高阶的大脑结构和意识的端点基底之间进行连续和完整的信息转换和共享。分子水平。我将其称为“分形化”。这种信息分形产生了一种新的有意识物质形式(“亮物质”)。明亮的物质由有意识的粒子或称为“哨兵”的单位组成。这些哨兵的内部分形将在循环分形神经网络 (RFNN) 中关闭一个循环(“心理循环”),该网络允许在更高阶的大脑结构和意识的终点基板之间进行连续和完整的信息转换和共享。分子水平。我将其称为“分形化”。这种信息分形产生了一种新的有意识物质形式(“亮物质”)。明亮的物质由有意识的粒子或称为“哨兵”的单位组成。这些哨兵的内部分形将在循环分形神经网络 (RFNN) 中关闭一个循环(“心理循环”),该网络允许在更高阶的大脑结构和意识的端点基底之间进行连续和完整的信息转换和共享。分子水平。
更新日期:2011-07-27
down
wechat
bug