当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The authors reply: Letter on: “Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard” by Clark et al.
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle Pub Date : 2019-01-30 , DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12387
Fanny Buckinx 1 , Francesco Landi 2 , Matteo Cesari 3, 4 , Roger A Fieding 5 , Marjolein Visser 6, 7 , Klaus Engelke 8 , Stefania Maggi 9 , Elaine Dennison 10 , Nasser M Al-Daghri 11 , Sophie Allepaerts 12 , Jurgen Bauer 13 , Ivan Bautmans 14 , Maria-Luisa Brandi 15 , Olivier Bruyère 1 , Tommy Cederholm 16 , Francesca Cerreta 16 , Antonio Cherubini 17 , Cyrus Cooper 10, 18 , Alphonso Cruz-Jentoft 19 , Eugene McCloskey 20, 21 , Bess Dawson-Hughes 22 , Jean-Marc Kaufman 23 , Andrea Laslop 24 , Jean Petermans 12 , Jean-Yves Reginster 1 , René Rizzoli 25 , Sian Robinson 10, 26 , Yves Rolland 27 , Ricardo Rueda 28 , Bruno Vellas 27 , John A Kanis 20, 29
Affiliation  

AbstractHowever, semantics aside, we think that DXA can indeed serve as a reference standard for measuring muscle mass. Obviously, CT and MRI are advanced techniques that can and have been used to obtain important information such as muscle size/volume and more recently amount and distribution of intra‐ and intermuscular adipose tissue. Also individual muscles can be assessed separately. However, with respect to muscle mass, the comparison of DXA with CT/MRI is rather difficult because DXA and QCT/MRI measure different physical parameters

中文翻译:

作者回复:克拉克等人写的信:“肌肉质量测量的陷阱:需要参考标准”。

摘要然而,撇开语义不谈,我们认为 DXA 确实可以作为测量肌肉质量的参考标准。显然,CT 和 MRI 是先进技术,可以并且已经用于获取重要信息,例如肌肉大小/体积以及最近的肌内和肌间脂肪组织的数量和分布。还可以单独评估个体肌肉。然而,就肌肉质量而言,DXA 与 CT/MRI 的比较相当困难,因为 DXA 和 QCT/MRI 测量的物理参数不同
更新日期:2019-01-30
down
wechat
bug