当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Public Health › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.
Annual Review of Public Health ( IF 20.8 ) Pub Date : 2006-12-08 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145
Russell E Glasgow 1 , Karen M Emmons
Affiliation  

This review summarizes key factors that have interfered with translation of research to practice and what public health researchers can do to hasten such transfer, focusing on characteristics of interventions, target settings, and research designs. The need to address context and to utilize research, review, and reporting practices that address external validity issues-such as designs that focus on replication, and practical clinical and behavioral trials-are emphasized. Although there has been increased emphasis on social-ecological interventions that go beyond the individual level, interventions often address each component as if it were an independent intervention. Greater attention is needed to connectedness across program levels and components. Finally, examples are provided of evaluation models and current programs that can help accelerate translation of research to practice and policy.

中文翻译:

我们如何才能将研究转化为实践?需要的证据类型。

这篇综述总结了影响研究转化为实践的关键因素,以及公共卫生研究人员可以采取哪些措施来加快这种转化,重点是干预措施的特点,目标设置和研究设计。强调需要解决背景问题,并利用解决外部有效性问题的研究,审查和报告实践,例如专注于复制的设计以及实际的临床和行为试验。尽管人们越来越重视超越个人水平的社会生态干预措施,但干预措施往往像对待独立干预措施一样处理每个组成部分。需要更加注意跨程序级别和组件的连接。最后,
更新日期:2019-11-01
down
wechat
bug