当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Food Drug Anal. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Medication-assisted treatment for opioid addiction: Methadone and buprenorphine
Journal of Food and Drug Analysis ( IF 3.6 ) Pub Date : 2013-12-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2013.09.037
Andrew J. Saxon , Yih-Ing Hser , George Woody , Walter Ling

Among agents for treatment of opioid addiction, methadone is a full mu-opioid receptor agonist, whereas buprenorphine is a partial agonist. Both are long-acting. Buprenorphine has a superior safety profile. Methadone is formulated for oral administration and buprenorphine for sublingual administration. A subdermal buprenorphine implant with a 6-month duration of action is being considered for approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Both medications reduce mortality rates and improve other outcomes. Data from a recent randomized controlled comparison of both medications (N = 1269) show better treatment retention with methadone but reduced illicit opioid use early in treatment with buprenorphine. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk behaviors were measured using the Risk Behavior Survey at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks for study completers. In the 30 days prior to treatment entry, 14.4% of the completers randomized to treatment with buprenorphine (n = 340) and 14.1% of the completers randomized to methadone treatment (n = 391) shared needles. The percent sharing needles decreased to 2.4% for buprenorphine and 4.8 for methadone in the 30 days prior to Week 24 (p < 0.0001). In the 30 days prior to treatment entry, 6.8% of the completers randomized to buprenorphine and 8.2% of the completers randomized to methadone had multiple sexual partners, with only 5.2% and 5.1%, respectively, reporting multiple partners at Week 24 (p < 0.04).

中文翻译:

阿片类药物成瘾的药物辅助治疗:美沙酮和丁丙诺啡

在治疗阿片类药物成瘾的药物中,美沙酮是一种完全的 μ-阿片受体激动剂,而丁丙诺啡是一种部分激动剂。两者都是长效的。丁丙诺啡具有优越的安全性。美沙酮用于口服,丁丙诺啡用于舌下给药。美国食品和药物管理局正在考虑批准一种作用持续时间为 6 个月的皮下丁丙诺啡植入物。这两种药物都能降低死亡率并改善其他结果。最近对两种药物(N = 1269)进行的随机对照比较数据显示,美沙酮治疗效果更好,但在丁丙诺啡治疗早期减少了非法阿片类药物的使用。人类免疫缺陷病毒 (HIV) 风险行为是使用风险行为调查在基线、12 周、学习完成者为 24 周。在开始治疗前 30 天,随机接受丁丙诺啡治疗的完成者中有 14.4% (n = 340),随机接受美沙酮治疗的完成者中有 14.1% (n = 391) 共用针头。在第 24 周之前的 30 天内,丁丙诺啡的共用针头百分比下降至 2.4%,美沙酮下降至 4.8%(p < 0.0001)。在治疗开始前的 30 天内,随机分配给丁丙诺啡的完成者中有 6.8% 和随机分配到美沙酮的完成者中有 8.2% 有多个性伴侣,分别只有 5.2% 和 5.1% 报告在第 24 周有多个性伴侣(p < 0.04)。在第 24 周之前的 30 天内,丁丙诺啡的共用针头百分比下降至 2.4%,美沙酮下降至 4.8%(p < 0.0001)。在治疗开始前的 30 天内,随机分配给丁丙诺啡的完成者中有 6.8% 和随机分配到美沙酮的完成者中有 8.2% 有多个性伴侣,分别只有 5.2% 和 5.1% 报告在第 24 周有多个性伴侣(p < 0.04)。在第 24 周之前的 30 天内,丁丙诺啡的共用针头百分比下降至 2.4%,美沙酮下降至 4.8%(p < 0.0001)。在治疗开始前的 30 天内,随机分配给丁丙诺啡的完成者中有 6.8% 和随机分配到美沙酮的完成者中有 8.2% 有多个性伴侣,分别只有 5.2% 和 5.1% 报告在第 24 周有多个性伴侣(p < 0.04)。
更新日期:2013-12-01
down
wechat
bug