BackgroundAssociations were examined between author-reported uses of reporting guidelines to prepare JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI) submissions, editorial decisions, and reviewer ratings for adherence to reporting guidelines and clarity of presentation.MethodsAt submission, authors were asked if they used reporting guidelines to prepare their manuscript and, if so, which one(s). Reviewers rated adherence to reporting guidelines and clarity of presentation. Data were gathered using a customized Editorial Manager Enterprise Analytics Report for submissions with first or final decisions that were submitted between November 1, 2015, and April 30, 2017. Manuscript types that would benefit from the use of reporting guidelines were included. All reviews were included in the analyses. Numerical values were given to each answer (yes, 1; no, 0) or reviewer rating (not applicable, 0; fair, 1; poor, 2; good, 3; very good, 4; and outstanding, 5), and scores were compared using two-sided t tests.ResultsOf 2209 submissions included in the analysis, 1144 (51.8%) indicated that at least one reporting guideline was used. The STROBE guidelines were the most common (n = 531, 24.0%). Of the 2068 (93.6%) submissions that were rejected, 1105 (50.1%) indicated using reporting guidelines and 963 (43.6%) did not (mean [SD] scores of rejected vs not rejected, 0.53 [0.50] vs 0.49 [0.50], P = .47). Of the 1033 ratings for adherence to reporting guidelines, mean (SD) scores for not rejected vs rejected submissions were 3.2 (1.61) vs 2.9 (1.57) (P = .005), and mean (SD) scores for reporting guidelines use vs no use were 3.1 (1.48) vs 2.9 (1.70) (P = .01). Of the 1036 ratings for clarity of presentation, mean (SD) scores for not rejected vs rejected submissions were 3.6 (1.00) vs 3.1 (1.08) (P < .001), whereas mean (SD) scores for reporting guidelines use vs no use were 3.3 (1.04) vs 3.3 (1.10) (P = .64).ConclusionsAmong these JNCI submissions, reporting the use of reporting guidelines was not associated with editorial decisions or with reviewer ratings for clarity of presentation. Reviewer ratings for adherence to guidelines and clarity of presentation were associated with editorial decisions after peer review, and ratings for adherence to guidelines were associated with reported use of reporting guidelines.

中文翻译：

---

报告在 JNCI 中使用报告指南：《美国国家癌症研究所杂志》的作者、编辑结果以及与指南遵守情况和表述清晰度相关的审稿人评级

背景检查了作者报告的使用报告指南来准备 JNCI：美国国家癌症研究所 (JNCI) 提交的期刊、编辑决定和审稿人对报告指南的遵守情况和表述清晰度的评级之间的关联。方法在提交时，询问作者是否他们使用报告指南来准备他们的手稿，如果是的话，是哪一个。审稿人对报告指南的遵守情况和表述的清晰度进行了评级。使用定制的编辑经理企业分析报告收集数据，用于在 2015 年 11 月 1 日至 2017 年 4 月 30 日期间提交的具有第一个或最终决定的提交。包括将受益于使用报告指南的手稿类型。所有评论都包含在分析中。每个答案都给出了数值（是的，1个；否，0）或审稿人评分（不适用，0；一般，1；差，2；好，3；非常好，4；优秀，5），并使用双边 t 检验比较分数。 2209 份提交的结果在分析中，1144 人（51.8%）表示至少使用了一种报告指南。STROBE 指南是最常见的（n = 531, 24.0%）。在被拒绝的 2068 份 (93.6%) 提交中，1105 份 (50.1%) 表示使用报告指南，963 份 (43.6%) 没有表示（拒绝与未拒绝的平均 [SD] 分数，0.53 [0.50] vs 0.49 [0.50] , P = .47)。在遵守报告指南的 1033 个评分中，未拒绝与拒绝提交的平均 (SD) 分数分别为 3.2 (1.61) 与 2.9 (1.57) (P = .005)，报告指南使用与否的平均 (SD) 分数使用分别为 3.1 (1.48) 和 2.9 (1.70) (P = .01)。在 1036 个表述清晰性评分中，未拒绝与拒绝提交的平均 (SD) 分数分别为 3.6 (1.00) 与 3.1 (1.08) (P < .001)，而报告指南使用与未使用的平均 (SD) 分数分别为 3.3 (1.04) 和 3.3 (1.10) (P = .64)。结论在这些 JNCI 提交的文件中，报告使用报告指南与编辑决定或审稿人评级无关，以确保表述清晰。审稿人对指南依从性和表述清晰度的评分与同行评审后的编辑决定相关，对指南依从性的评分与报告指南的使用情况相关。04) 与 3.3 (1.10) (P = .64)。结论在这些 JNCI 提交中，报告使用报告指南与编辑决定或审稿人评级无关，以确保表述清晰。审稿人对指南依从性和表述清晰度的评分与同行评审后的编辑决定相关，对指南依从性的评分与报告指南的使用情况相关。04) 与 3.3 (1.10) (P = .64)。结论在这些 JNCI 提交中，报告使用报告指南与编辑决定或审稿人评级无关，以确保表述清晰。审稿人对指南依从性和表述清晰度的评分与同行评审后的编辑决定相关，对指南依从性的评分与报告指南的使用情况相关。