This paper is a postscript to the four companion papers in this issue of the Journal (Solomon and Stephenson 2017a , 2017b ; Stephenson and Solomon 2017a , 2017b ). The first paper in the series described the conceptual model and the methods of the QWoE process. The other three papers described the application of the QWoE process to studies on imidacloprid (IMI), clothianidin (CTD), and thiamethoxam (TMX). This postscript was written to summarize the utility of the methods used in the quantitative weight of evidence (QWoE), the overall relevance of the results, and the environmental implications of the findings. Hopefully, this will be helpful to others who wish to conduct QWoEs and use these methods in assessment of risks.

中文翻译：

---

使用吡虫啉，可尼丁和噻虫嗪作为种子处理剂对蜜蜂菌落的风险评估的定量证据：附言。

本文是本期《期刊》（Solomon and Stephenson 2017a，2017b; Stephenson and Solomon 2017a，2017b）四篇配套论文的后记。该系列的第一篇文章描述了QWoE过程的概念模型和方法。其他三篇论文描述了QWoE方法在吡虫啉（IMI），可尼丁（CTD）和噻虫嗪（TMX）研究中的应用。撰写此后记的目的是总结定量证据权重（QWoE）中使用的方法的效用，结果的整体相关性以及发现的环境影响。希望这对希望进行QWoE并使用这些方法评估风险的其他人有所帮助。