当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Postexercise hypotension during different water-based concurrent training intrasession sequences in young women.
Journal of the American Society of Hypertension Pub Date : 2017-09-04 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.08.002
Stephanie Santana Pinto 1 , Daniel Umpierre 2 , Hector Kerchirne Ferreira 1 , Gabriela Neves Nunes 1 , Rodrigo Ferrari 3 , Cristine Lima Alberton 1
Affiliation  

The purpose of the study was to compare the acute effects of water-based resistance-aerobic (RA) and aerobic-resistance (AR) sequences on systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean blood pressure (MBP) in young women. Thirteen active women participated in four sessions: (1) exercises familiarization, (2) aquatic maximal test to determine the heart rate (HR) corresponding to the anaerobic threshold (HRAT), (3) concurrent protocol RA, and (4) concurrent protocol AR. Both protocols were initiated with the blood pressure measurements at rest in supine position. After that, either RA or AR concurrent protocol was performed. At the end of both protocols, blood pressure was measured throughout 60 minutes (every 10 minutes). The water-based resistance protocol was made up by exercises at maximal velocity, and the water-based aerobic protocol was performed at ±5 bpm of HRAT continuously. Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to analyze the data (α = 0.05). There was no hypotensive effect on systolic blood pressure among the time points (P = .235) in both water-based intrasession exercise sequences (P = .423). Regarding the DBP and MBP, both intrasession exercise sequences presented similar (DBP: P = .980; MBP: P = .796) hypotensive effects in the first 10 minutes (DBP: P = .003; MBP: P = .008) at the end of RA and AR sessions (DBP: -4 vs. -13 mm Hg; MBP: -3 vs. -10 mm Hg). It was concluded that both RA and AR water-based concurrent training sessions resulted in postexercise hypotension (DBP and MBP) in normotensive young women.

中文翻译:

运动后低血压在年轻女性的不同水基同时训练过程中。

这项研究的目的是比较水性抗需氧性(RA)和好氧抗性(AR)序列对年轻人的收缩压,舒张压(DBP)和平均血压(MBP)的急性影响女性。13位活跃妇女参加了四个会议:(1)进行锻炼熟悉,(2)水上最大测试以确定与无氧阈值(HRAT)相对应的心率(HR),(3)并发协议RA,以及(4)并发协议AR。两种方案均始于仰卧位休息时的血压测量。之后,执行RA或AR并发协议。在这两个方案的最后,整个60分钟(每10分钟)测量一次血压。水性抵抗方案是通过最大速度的锻炼来完成的,并在HRAT的±5 bpm下连续进行水基有氧运动。使用重复测量的方差的双向分析来分析数据(α= 0.05)。在两种水上运动期间(P = .423)中,各个时间点(P = .235)对收缩压均无降压作用。关于DBP和MBP,在开始的10分钟内(DBP:P = .003; MBP:P = .008),这两个会话期间锻炼序列在前10分钟内表现出相似的降压作用(DBP:P = .980; MBP:P = .796)。 RA和AR会话结束(DBP:-4 vs. -13 mm Hg; MBP:-3 vs. -10 mm Hg)。得出的结论是,RA和AR的水基同时训练均导致血压正常的年轻女性运动后低血压(DBP和MBP)。使用重复测量的方差的双向分析来分析数据(α= 0.05)。在两种水上运动期间(P = .423)中,各个时间点(P = .235)对收缩压均无降压作用。关于DBP和MBP,在开始的10分钟内(DBP:P = .003; MBP:P = .008),这两个会话期间锻炼序列在前10分钟内表现出相似的降压作用(DBP:P = .980; MBP:P = .796)。 RA和AR会话结束(DBP:-4 vs. -13 mm Hg; MBP:-3 vs. -10 mm Hg)。得出的结论是,RA和AR的水基同时训练均导致血压正常的年轻女性运动后低血压(DBP和MBP)。使用重复测量的方差的双向分析来分析数据(α= 0.05)。在两种水上运动期间(P = .423)中,各个时间点(P = .235)对收缩压均无降压作用。关于DBP和MBP,在开始的10分钟内(DBP:P = .003; MBP:P = .008),这两个会话期间锻炼序列在前10分钟内表现出相似的降压作用(DBP:P = .980; MBP:P = .796)。 RA和AR会话结束(DBP:-4 vs. -13 mm Hg; MBP:-3 vs. -10 mm Hg)。得出的结论是,RA和AR的水基同时训练均导致血压正常的年轻女性运动后低血压(DBP和MBP)。235)的两个水上运动期间练习序列(P = .423)。关于DBP和MBP,在开始的10分钟内(DBP:P = .003; MBP:P = .008),这两个会话期间锻炼序列在前10分钟内表现出相似的降压作用(DBP:P = .980; MBP:P = .796)。 RA和AR会话结束(DBP:-4 vs. -13 mm Hg; MBP:-3 vs. -10 mm Hg)。得出的结论是,RA和AR的水基同时训练均导致血压正常的年轻女性运动后低血压(DBP和MBP)。235)的两个水上运动期间练习序列(P = .423)。关于DBP和MBP,在开始的10分钟内(DBP:P = .003; MBP:P = .008),这两个会话期间锻炼序列在前10分钟内表现出相似的降压作用(DBP:P = .980; MBP:P = .796)。 RA和AR会话结束(DBP:-4 vs. -13 mm Hg; MBP:-3 vs. -10 mm Hg)。得出的结论是,RA和AR的水基同时训练均导致血压正常的年轻女性运动后低血压(DBP和MBP)。
更新日期:2019-11-01
down
wechat
bug