Reports an error in "Linking Boundary Crossing from Work to Nonwork to Work-Related Rumination across Time: A Variable- and Person-Oriented Approach" by Ulla Kinnunen, Taru Feldt, Jessica de Bloom, Marjaana Sianoja, Kalevi Korpela and Sabine Geurts (Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Apr 28, 2016, np). There were errors in two separate sections of the article. The final sentence preceding Hypothesis 4 in "The Present Study" section should read, "We did not hypothesize that the specific forms of work-related thoughts (i.e., affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, or lack of psychological detachment) would be differently associated with stability or changes in boundary crossing behavior." The fifth sentence in the second paragraph of the "Identifying Subgroups of Boundary Crossing Behavior Across Time" subsection of the "Results" section should read, "Group 5 (n = 162, 19%), characterized by stable low boundary crossing behavior across time (M = 1.37 for Time 1 and M = 1.34 for Time 2), and Group 6 (n = 154, 18%), characterized by stable high boundary crossing behavior (M = 4.54 for Time 1 and M = 4.60 for Time 2), were almost equally large in size." (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-20812-001.) This 1-year follow-up study (N = 841) investigated the relationship between boundary crossing behavior from work to nonwork and work-related rumination (i.e., affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, and lack of psychological detachment from work during off-job time). This relationship is important to examine as work-related rumination is a risk factor for poor recovery and ill-health over time. The aims were twofold: first, to examine these relationships in terms of temporal ordering, and, second, to show how individual differences regarding stability and change of boundaries from work to nonwork are reflected in work-related rumination across time. The structural equation modeling analyses lent support to the hypothesized normal causation model compared with the reversed causation and reciprocal models. However, only the cross-lagged relationship between high boundary crossing behavior at T1 and lack of psychological detachment at T2 was significant. Through latent profile analysis, 6 subgroups of boundary crossing behavior across time were identified. Over 70% of the employees belonged to the stable (low, moderate, high) and about one-third to the changing (mostly increasing) boundary crossing subgroups. Employees in the 2 stable (high and moderate) boundary crossing subgroups reported less psychological detachment and more problem-solving pondering during off-job time than did those in the low boundary crossing subgroup. Employees in the change groups reported simultaneous expected changes, especially in their problem-solving pondering. No effects on affective rumination were found. Thus frequent boundary crossing behavior from work to nonwork plays a different role regarding the various forms of work-related rumination during nonwork. (PsycINFO Database Record

中文翻译：

---

“将跨界的从工作到非工作的跨界联系到跨时间的与工作相关的思考：一种以可变和面向人的方法”：对Kinnunen等人的更正。（2016）。

报告了Ulla Kinnunen，Taru Feldt，Jessica de Bloom，Marjaana Sianoja，Kalevi Korpela和Sabine Geurts撰写的“跨时间跨界联系从工作到非工作到与工作相关的反省：一种以变量和人为导向的方法”中的错误职业健康心理学杂志》，高级在线出版，2016年4月28日，np）。在文章的两个单独的部分中有错误。在“当前研究”部分的假设4之前的最后一句应为：“我们没有假设与工作相关的思想的特定形式（即情感反省，解决问题的思考或缺乏心理超脱）将有所不同与稳定性或越境行为的改变有关。” “ 这种关系很重要，因为与工作相关的反省是长期恢复不佳和健康欠佳的风险因素。目的是双重的：首先，根据时间顺序检查这些关系；其次，展示在稳定性方面的个体差异以及从工作到非工作的边界变化如何在跨时间的工作相关反思中得到体现。与反向因果关系模型和互惠模型相比，结构方程模型分析为假设的正常因果关系模型提供了有力的支持。但是，只有T1处的高边界穿越行为与T2处的心理超脱之间的交叉滞后关系才有意义。通过潜在的轮廓分析，确定了跨时间跨界行为的6个子类。超过70％的员工属于马stable（低，中度，高度）和变化的（大部分是增加的）边界交叉子组的三分之一。与低边界跨越小组相比，在两个稳定的（较高和中度）边界跨越子组中，员工报告的下班期间心理支离感较少，而解决问题的思考更多。变更组中的员工报告了预期的同时变更，尤其是在解决问题的思考中。未发现对情感反刍的影响。因此，从非工作到非工作的频繁跨界行为对于非工作期间与工作相关的各种反思形式起着不同的作用。（PsycINFO数据库记录 与低边界跨越小组相比，在两个稳定的（高和中度）边界跨越子组中，员工报告的下班期间心理支离感较少，而解决问题的思考更多。变更组中的员工报告了预期的同时变更，尤其是在解决问题的思考中。未发现对情感反刍的影响。因此，从非工作到非工作的频繁跨界行为对于非工作期间与工作相关的各种反思形式起着不同的作用。（PsycINFO数据库记录 与低边界跨越小组相比，在两个稳定的（较高和中度）边界跨越子组中，员工报告的下班期间心理支离感较少，而解决问题的思考更多。变更组中的员工报告了预期的同时变更，尤其是在解决问题的思考中。未发现对情感反刍的影响。因此，从非工作到非工作的频繁跨界行为对于非工作期间与工作相关的各种反思形式起着不同的作用。（PsycINFO数据库记录 未发现对情感反刍的影响。因此，从非工作到非工作的频繁跨界行为对于非工作期间与工作相关的各种反思形式起着不同的作用。（PsycINFO数据库记录 未发现对情感反刍的影响。因此，从非工作到非工作的频繁跨界行为对于非工作期间与工作相关的各种反思形式起着不同的作用。（PsycINFO数据库记录