Reports an error in "Effects of Stress on Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Meta-Analysis" by Katrin Starcke and Matthias Brand (Psychological Bulletin, Advanced Online Publication, May 23, 2016, np). It should have been reported that the inverted u-shaped relationship between cortisol stress responses and decision-making performance was only observed in female, but not in male participants as suggested by the study by van den Bos, Harteveld, and Stoop (2009). Corrected versions of the affected sentences are provided. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-25465-001.) The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to quantify the effects that stress has on decisions made under uncertainty. We hypothesized that stress increases reward seeking and risk taking through alterations of dopamine firing rates and reduces executive control by hindering optimal prefrontal cortex functioning. In certain decision situations, increased reward seeking and risk taking is dysfunctional, whereas in others, this is not the case. We also assumed that the type of stressor plays a role. In addition, moderating variables are analyzed, such as the hormonal stress response, the time between stress onset and decisions, and the participants' age and gender. We included studies in the meta-analysis that investigated decision making after a laboratory stress-induction versus a control condition (k = 32 datasets, N = 1829 participants). A random-effects model revealed that overall, stress conditions lead to decisions that can be described as more disadvantageous, more reward seeking, and more risk taking than nonstress conditions (d = .17). In those situations in which increased reward seeking and risk taking is disadvantageous, stress had significant effects (d = .26), whereas in other situations, no effects were observed (d = .01). Effects were observed under processive stressors (d = .19), but not under systemic ones (d = .09). Moderation analyses did not reveal any significant results. We concluded that stress deteriorates overall decision-making performance through the mechanisms proposed. The effects differ, depending on the decision situation and the type of stressor, but not on the characteristics of the individuals. (PsycINFO Database Record

中文翻译：

---

“压力对不确定性下决策的影响：荟萃分析”：对Starcke和Brand的更正（2016年）。

报告Katrin Starcke和Matthias Brand撰写的“不确定性下压力对决策的影响：荟萃分析”中的错误（心理公告，高级在线出版物，2016年5月23日，np）。据报道，van den Bos，Harteveld和Stoop（2009）的研究表明，皮质醇应激反应和决策绩效之间的倒U型关系仅在女性中观察到，而在男性参与者中未观察到。提供了受影响句子的正确版本。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2016-25465-001中。）本荟萃分析的目的是量化压力对不确定性下决策的影响。我们假设压力会通过改变多巴胺激发速率来增加寻求奖励和承担风险的能力，并通过阻碍最佳的前额叶皮层功能来降低执行控制。在某些决策情况下，增加的寻求奖励和冒险精神是不正常的，而在其他情况下，情况并非如此。我们还假设压力源的类型起作用。此外，还分析了调节变量，例如荷尔蒙压力反应，压力发作与决定之间的时间以及参与者的年龄和性别。我们在荟萃分析中纳入了研究，这些研究调查了实验室压力诱导与对照条件之间的决策（k = 32个数据集，N = 1829名参与者）。随机效应模型表明，总体而言，压力条件下的决策比非压力条件下的决策更具劣势，寻求奖励和承担更大的风险（d = .17）。在那些寻求奖励和冒险的增加不利的情况下，压力具有显着影响（d = .26），而在其他情况下，没有观察到影响（d = .01）。在过程性应激源（d = .19）下观察到效果，但在全身性应激源下（d = .09）没有观察到效果。适度分析未显示任何重大结果。我们得出的结论是，压力会通过提出的机制降低总体决策绩效。效果因决策情况和压力源类型而异，但与个人特征无关。（PsycINFO数据库记录 比无压力的情况承担更多的风险（d = .17）。在那些寻求奖励和冒险的增加不利的情况下，压力具有显着影响（d = .26），而在其他情况下，没有观察到影响（d = .01）。在过程性应激源（d = .19）下观察到效果，但在全身性应激源下（d = .09）没有观察到效果。适度分析未显示任何重大结果。我们得出的结论是，压力会通过提出的机制降低总体决策绩效。效果因决策情况和压力源类型而异，但与个人特征无关。（PsycINFO数据库记录 比无压力的情况承担更多的风险（d = .17）。在那些寻求奖励和冒险的增加不利的情况下，压力具有显着影响（d = .26），而在其他情况下，没有观察到影响（d = .01）。在过程性应激源（d = .19）下观察到效果，但在全身性应激源下（d = .09）没有观察到效果。适度分析未显示任何重大结果。我们得出的结论是，压力会通过提出的机制降低总体决策绩效。效果因决策情况和压力源类型而异，但与个人特征无关。（PsycINFO数据库记录 没有观察到任何影响（d = 0.01）。在过程性应激源（d = .19）下观察到效果，但在全身性应激源下（d = .09）没有观察到效果。适度分析未显示任何重大结果。我们得出的结论是，压力会通过提出的机制降低总体决策绩效。效果因决策情况和压力源类型而异，但与个人特征无关。（PsycINFO数据库记录 没有观察到任何影响（d = 0.01）。在过程性应激源（d = .19）下观察到效果，但在全身性应激源下（d = .09）没有观察到效果。适度分析未显示任何重大结果。我们得出的结论是，压力会通过提出的机制降低总体决策绩效。效果因决策情况和压力源类型而异，但与个人特征无关。（PsycINFO数据库记录 但不是关于个人的特征。（PsycINFO数据库记录 但不是关于个人的特征。（PsycINFO数据库记录