当前位置: X-MOL 学术Psychol. Inq. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Getting Spearman off the Skyhook: One More in a Century (Since Thomson, 1916) of Attempts to Vanquishg
Psychological Inquiry ( IF 5.581 ) Pub Date : 2016-07-02 , DOI: 10.1080/1047840x.2016.1186525
Ian J Deary 1 , Simon R Cox 2 , Stuart J Ritchie 1
Affiliation  

We provide seven responses to Kovacs and Conway's wide-ranging theory of intelligence differences. In the first six, we: reflect on the past theories that can be heard in this new one and how they have fared; discuss whether, in their present state, cognitive processes inferred from mental tests can be considered isomorphic with brain processes and can bear explanatory weight in theories of intelligence; and suggest that the positive manifold might be a formative biological latent trait while probably being a reflective psychological one. In the seventh, we attempt to test some hypotheses from Process Overlap Theory in our own Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 data.

中文翻译:

让 Spearman 摆脱 Skyhook:一个世纪以来(自 Thomson,1916 年以来)再次尝试征服

我们对 Kovacs 和 Conway 广泛的智力差异理论提供了七种回应。在前六个中,我们: 反思在这个新理论中可以听到的过去理论以及它们的表现;讨论在目前的状态下,从心理测试推断出的认知过程是否可以被认为与大脑过程同构,并且可以在智力理论中承担解释权重;并表明正流形可能是一种形成性的生物学潜在特征,同时可能是一种反思性的心理特征。在第七部分中,我们尝试在我们自己的 Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 数据中检验来自过程重叠理论的一些假设。
更新日期:2016-07-02
down
wechat
bug