Recently, Hermans and colleagues [1] presented a model that highlighted the temporal and reciprocal dynamics of a salience network and an executive control network during and following a stressful event (see Figure 1A for details). This model, based on, among others, electrophysiological data in animals and functional MRI (fMRI) as well as functional connectivity MRI data in humans, is highly valuable for studying the general mechanism of stress-related changes in brain networks. However, no attention was paid in the paper to two features that are crucial for understanding the outcome of stress-related network dynamics and which provide a biological, ecologically relevant, context: (i) sex differences following a stressor; and (ii) individual differences following a stressor [2].

中文翻译：

---

性别很重要，个体差异也很重要……

最近，Hermans 及其同事 [1] 提出了一个模型，该模型强调了在压力事件期间和之后的显着性网络和执行控制网络的时间和相互动态（详见图 1A）。该模型基于动物和功能性 MRI (fMRI) 的电生理数据以及人类的功能连接性 MRI 数据等，对于研究大脑网络中压力相关变化的一般机制非常有价值。然而，论文中没有关注对理解压力相关网络动态的结果至关重要并提供生物学、生态相关背景的两个特征：（i）压力源后的性别差异；(ii) 压力源后的个体差异 [2]。