Abstract
Sexual concerns after prostate cancer (PCa) treatment are high. Flexible coping is a crucial element to maintaining sexual activity after PCa and improves adaptation outcomes. We aimed to identify potential sexual adaptation styles reported by men following PCa treatment, and to assess relationships among associated variables and outcomes. Individuals (n = 223) with PCa treatment history (e.g., radical prostatectomy [n = 165, 74.0%], external beam radiation [n = 83, 37.2%], hormone/androgen deprivation therapy [n = 83, 37.2%]), completed an online survey assessing sexual variables and processes of sexual adaptation. Using a combination of inductive and deductive coding, open-ended responses were thematically analyzed and grouped into sexual adaptation styles. Factors potentially associated with sexual adaptation styles (e.g., age, perceived partner involvement, co-morbidities, relationship duration, time since PCa treatment, desire for physical affection, depression, relationship adjustment) were tested using multinomial logistic regression. Outcomes of sexual well-being (sexual distress, sexual bother, sexual satisfaction) and relationship adjustment were compared against each sexual adaptation style using a multivariate analysis of variance. Sexual activity status and satisfaction with the adaptation process was assessed across the sexual adaptation styles using a chi-square analysis and post-hoc tests. Two distinct categories were identified: those who had Adapted (n = 185) and those who had Not Adapted (n = 38). Four sexual adaptation styles emerged in the adapted category: Relationship Renegotiation (n = 53) and Sexual Renegotiation (n = 47), which were couples-focused styles, and Acceptance/Resignation (n = 34) and Masturbation/Erection (n = 48), which were individual-focused styles. Participants who could not be categorized as one style, but rather met several, were identified as Mixed (n = 3). Higher rates of depression, lower relationship adjustment, lack of sexual activity, and greater dissatisfaction with the adaptation process were observed for Not Adapted participants. Participants engaged in any type of adaptation style fared better than those who had Not Adapted. Couples-focused styles tended to emphasize renegotiation, including a changed perspective on the expression of the relationship. Perceived direct engagement of the partner facilitated adaptation and emphasized engagement with flexible coping, either through redefining priorities or ways of being sexual. Individual-focused styles emphasized pre-cancer erectile function, and either aimed to return to capacity for penetrative sexual activity or accepted its inaccessibility and largely an abandonment of partnered sexual activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, A. M., Robinson, J. W., & Carlson, L. E. (2013). Sexual values as the key to maintaining satisfying sex after prostate cancer treatment: The physical pleasure–relational intimacy model of sexual motivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(8), 1637–1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0168-z
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x
Byers, E. S., Demmons, S., & Lawrance, K. A. (1998). Sexual satisfaction within dating relationships: A test of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759815200
Chambers, S. K., Chung, E., Wittert, G., & Hyde, M. K. (2017). Erectile dysfunction, masculinity, and psychosocial outcomes: A review of the experiences of men after prostate cancer treatment. Translational Andrology and Urology, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.08.12
Clayton, A. H., Segraves, R. T., Leiblum, S., Basson, R., Pyke, R., Cotton, D., Lewis-D’Agostino, D., Evans, K. R., Sills, T. L., & Wunderlich, G. R. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female (SIDI-F), a scale designed to measure severity of female hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230500442300
DeFade, B. D., Carson, C. C., III., & Kennelly, M. J. (2011). Prostatectomy erectile dysfunction: The role of penile rehabilitation. Reviews in Urology, 13(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.3909/riu0501
Derogatis, L. R., Rosen, R., Leiblum, S., Burnett, A., & Heiman, J. (2002). The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 28(4), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230290001448
Fode, M., Serefoglu, E. C., Albersen, M., & Sønksen, J. (2017). Sexuality after radical prostatectomy: Is restoration of erectile function enough? Sexual Medicine Reviews, 5(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.07.005
Garos, S., Kluck, A., & Aronoff, D. (2007). Couples’sexual dysfunctions: Prostate cancer patients and their partners: Differences in satisfaction indices and psychological variables. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4(5), 1394–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00545.x
Hayes, R. D. (2008). Assessing female sexual dysfunction in epidemiological studies: Why is it necessary to measure both low sexual function and sexually-related distress? Sexual Health, 5(3), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH08016
Kaplan, A. L., Hu, J. C., Morgentaler, A., Mulhall, J. P., Schulman, C. C., & Montorsi, F. (2016). Testosterone therapy in men with prostate cancer. European Urology, 69(5), 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.005
Kukula, K., Jackowich, R., & Wassersug, R. (2014). Eroticization as a factor influencing erectile dysfunction treatment effectiveness. International Journal of Impotence Research, 26, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2013.29
Lawrance, K.-A., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
Letts, C., Tamlyn, K., & Byers, E. S. (2010). Exploring the impact of prostate cancer on men’s sexual well-being. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 28(5), 490–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2010.498457
Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.
Manne, S. L., Norton, T. R., Ostroff, J. S., Winkel, G., Fox, K., & Grana, G. (2007). Protective buffering and psychological distress among couples coping with breast cancer: The moderating role of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.380
Matthew, A. G., Goldman, A., Trachtenberg, J., Robinson, J., Horsburgh, S., Currie, K., & Ritvo, P. (2005). Sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: Prevalence, treatments, restricted use of treatments and distress. Journal of Urology, 174(6), 2105–2110. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000181206.16447.e2
Nelson, C. J., Choi, J. M., Mulhall, J. P., & Roth, A. J. (2007). Erectile dysfunction: Determinants of sexual satisfaction in men with prostate cancer. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4(5), 1422–1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00547.x
Nelson, C. J., Mulhall, J. P., & Roth, A. J. (2011). The association between erectile dysfunction and depressive symptoms in men treated for prostate cancer. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(2), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02127.x
Perz, J., Ussher, J. M., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Feeling well and talking about sex: Psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer. BMC Cancer, 14, 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-228
Ptacek, J. T., Pierce, G. R., & Ptacek, J. J. (2007). Coping, distress, and marital adjustment in couples with cancer: An examination of the personal and social context. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 25(2), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J077v25n02_03
Reese, J. B., Keefe, F. J., Somers, T. J., & Abernethy, A. P. (2010). Coping with sexual concerns after cancer: The use of flexible coping. Supportive Care in Cancer, 18(7), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0819-8
Reese, J. B., Handorf, E., & Haythornthwaite, J. A. (2018). Sexual quality of life, body image distress, and psychosocial outcomes in colorectal cancer: A longitudinal study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 26(10), 3431–3440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4204-3
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4%3c334::AID-NUR9%3e3.0.CO;2-G
Santos-Iglesias, P., Rana, M., & Walker, L. M. (2020a). A systematic review of sexual satisfaction in prostate cancer patients. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 8(3), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.09.001
Santos-Iglesias, P., Bergeron, S., Brotto, L. A., Rosen, N. O., & Walker, L. M. (2020b). Preliminary validation of the Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form: Applications to women, men, and prostate cancer survivors. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(6), 542–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1761494
Schauer, I., Keller, E., Müller, A., & Madersbacher, S. (2015). Have rates of erectile dysfunction improved within the past 17 years after radical prostatectomy? A systematic analysis of the control arms of prospective randomized trials on penile rehabilitation. Andrology, 3, 661–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12060
Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2010). Differentiating components of sexual well-being in women: Are sexual satisfaction and sexual distress independent constructs? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(7), 2458–2468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01836.x
Ussher, J. M., Perz, J., Gilbert, E., Wong, W. K. T., & Hobbs, K. (2013). Renegotiating sex and intimacy after cancer: Resisting the coital imperative. Cancer Nursing, 36(6), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182759e21
Ussher, J. M., Perz, J., Rose, D., Kellett, A., & Dowsett, G. (2018). Sexual rehabilitation after prostate cancer through assistive aids: A Comparison of gay/bisexual and heterosexual men. Journal of Sex Research, 56(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1476444
Walker, L. M., & Santos-Iglesias, P. (2020). On the relationship between erectile function and sexual distress in men with prostate cancer. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 1575–1588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01603-y
Walker, L. M., Wassersug, R. J., & Robinson, J. W. (2015). Psychosocial perspectives on sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment. Nature Reviews Urology, 12(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.29
Wei, J. T., Dunn, R. L., Litwin, M. S., Sandler, H. M., & Sanda, M. G. (2000). Development and validation of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology, 56(6), 899–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00858-X
Williams, K. C., Hicks, E. M., Chang, N., Connor, S. E., & Maliski, S. L. (2014). Purposeful normalization when caring for husbands recovering from prostate cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 24, 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314523842
Wittmann, D., Carolan, M., Given, B., Skolarus, T. A., An, L., Palapattu, G., & Montie, J. E. (2014). Exploring the role of the partner in couples’ sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(9), 2509–2515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2244-x
Wittmann, D., Carolan, M., Given, B., Skolarus, T. A., Crossley, H., An, L., Palapattu, G., Clarke, P., & Montie, J. E. (2015a). What couples say about their recovery of sexual intimacy after prostatectomy: toward the development of a conceptual model of couples’ sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(2), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12732
Wittmann, D., Foley, S., & Balon, R. (2011). A biopsychosocial approach to sexual recovery after prostate cancer surgery: The role of grief and mourning. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 37(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2011.560538
Wittmann, D., Northouse, L., Crossley, H., Miller, D., Dunn, R., Nidetz, J., & Montie, J. E. (2015b). A pilot study of potential pre-operative barriers to couples’ sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2013.842194
Wittmann, D., Braun, T., Mehta, A., Pollack, C. E., Dunn, R. L., Zhu, Z., Carter, C., Duby, A., Paich, K., Skolarus, T. A., An, L. C., Nelson, C., Saigal, C., Chen, R. C., & Bober, S. L. (2020). Coping with the sexual side-effects of prostate cancer treatment: It’s a couple affair. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 17(1), s50–s51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.11.108
Funding
Dr. Lauren M. Walker is funded by the Daniel Family Chair in PsychoOncology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta – Cancer Research (HREBA.CC-18–0249), and the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individuals participants included in this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Questions Designed or Adapted for Study
Perception of Partners Involvement
Participants perception of partners involvement was assessed using two questions, created specifically for this study. Due to these two items being highly correlated, scores on these two questions were added together and averaged; Higher scores indicate greater levels of partner involvement (α = 0.90) (Walker & Santos-Iglesias, 2020).
-
(1)
My partner would be interested in maintaining a sexual relationship (1 = not at all confident, 5 = very confident)
-
(2)
My partner would be supportive to me in helping me find a solution to my erectile dysfunction (1 = not at all confident, 5 = very confident)
Desire for Physical Affection
Desire for physical affection was assessed using a single item from the Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female (Clayton et al., 2006):
“Over the past month, how often have you wanted physical affection other than sex (e.g., touching, holding, kissing)?” (1 = never, 2 = less than once a week, 3 = more than once a week, 4 = daily).
Satisfaction with Sexual Adaptation
Participants’ satisfaction with sexual adaptation was assessed using the following forced choice question:
“If you had to choose, would you describe yourself as more satisfied or dissatisfied with your adaptation to sexual changes.” (more satisfied than dissatisfied, more dissatisfied than satisfied).
Sexual Adaptation Style
A series of open-ended questions queried participants adaptation to PCa treatment-related sexual changes. Participants were asked to reflect on their own perceptions when responding to survey questions and to complete the study privately (in the absence of their partner). Therefore, patients reported on their perceptions of factors both personally and as a couple.
Participants were given a prompt and then asked a series of two open-ended questions. Following this prompt, the first question contained two parts (personal vs. couple) and asked about facilitators to adaptation, the second question contained the same two parts (personal vs. couple) and queried barriers to adaptation.
-
1.
“We’d like to know what has helped as well as what has made it more difficult for you to adapt, personally and as a couple. (Please take the time to write a few sentences for each question).”
-
2.
“What has helped you the most in adapting to those sexual changes…(a) Personally? and (b) As a couple?”
-
3.
“What has made it difficult to adapt to those sexual changes…a) Personally? and b) As a couple?”
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shah, F.I., MacLeod, F. & Walker, L.M. Patient Reported Sexual Adaptation Following Prostate Cancer Treatment: An Analysis of Related Variables and Sexual Outcomes Associated with Sexual Adaptation Styles. Arch Sex Behav (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02855-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02855-z