Skip to main content
Log in

Upper Tail Behavior of the Number of Triangles in Random Graphs with Constant Average Degree

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Combinatorica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let N be the number of triangles in an Erdős–Rényi graph \({\mathcal {G}}(n,p)\) on n vertices with edge density \(p=d/n,\) where \(d>0\) is a fixed constant. It is well known that N weakly converges to the Poisson distribution with mean \({d^3}/{6}\) as \(n\rightarrow \infty \). We address the upper tail problem for N,  namely, we investigate how fast k must grow, so that \({\mathbb {P}}(N\ge k)\) is not well approximated anymore by the tail of the corresponding Poisson variable. Proving that the tail exhibits a sharp phase transition, we essentially show that the upper tail is governed by Poisson behavior only when \(k^{1/3} \log k< (\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}} - {o(1)})^{2/3} \log n\) (sub-critical regime) as well as pin down the tail behavior when \(k^{1/3} \log k> (\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}} + {o(1)})^{2/3} \log n\) (super-critical regime). We further prove a structure theorem, showing that the sub-critical upper tail behavior is dictated by the appearance of almost k vertex-disjoint triangles whereas in the supercritical regime, the excess triangles arise from a clique like structure of size approximately \((6k)^{1/3}\). This settles the long-standing upper-tail problem in this case, answering a question of Aldous, complementing a long sequence of works, spanning multiple decades and culminating in Harel et al. (Duke Math J 171(10):2089–2192, 2022), which analyzed the problem only in the regime \(p\gg \frac{1}{n}.\) The proofs rely on several novel graph theoretical results which could have other applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. \(\approx \) will be informally used throughout the article to denote ‘close to’ in a sense whose interpretation might change across locations depending on the context. This will not feature in any proof and hence we will refrain from being more precise.

  2. We write \(f \lesssim g\) to denote \(f = O(g)\); \(f \asymp g\) means \(f = \Theta (g)\); \(f \sim g\) means \(f = (1+o(1))g\) and \(f \ll g\) means \(f = o(g)\).

  3. We say that H is the \(\textsf{TISG}\) spanned by \(\ell \) triangles \(T_1,\ldots ,T_\ell ,\) if H is connected and is the union of \(T_1,\ldots ,T_\ell \).

References

  1. Alon, N.: On the number of subgraphs of prescribed type of graphs with a given number of edges. Israel J. Math. 38(1), 116–130 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Andreis, L., König, W., Patterson, R.I.A.: A large-deviations principle for all the cluster sizes of a sparse Erdős–Rényi graph. Random Struct. Algorith. 59(4), 522–553 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andreis, L., König, W., Langhammer, H., Patterson, R.I.A.: A large-deviations principle for all the components in a sparse inhomogeneous random graph. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 186, 1–100 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Augeri, F.: Nonlinear large deviation bounds with applications to Eigner matrices and sparse Erdős–Rényi graphs. Ann. Probab. 48(5), 2404–2448 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacharya, B.B., Diaconis, P., Mukherjee, S.: Universal limit theorems in graph coloring problems with connections to extremal combinatorics. Ann. Appl. Probab. 27(1), 337–394 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharya, B.B., Ganguly, S., Lubetzky, E., Zhao, Y.: Upper tails and independence polynomials in random graphs. Adv. Math. 319, 313–347 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollobás, B.: Threshold functions for small subgraphs. In: Green, B.J. (ed.) Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 90, pp. 197–206. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bollobás, B.: Random Graphs, Volume 73 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Chakraborty, S., van der Hofstad, R., den Hollander, F.: Sparse random graphs with many triangles. arXiv:2112.06526 (2021)

  10. Chatterjee, S.: The missing log in large deviations for triangle counts. Random Struct. Algorith. 40(4), 437–451 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chatterjee, S.: An introduction to large deviations for random graphs. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 53(4), 617–642 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Chatterjee, S., Dembo, A.: Nonlinear large deviations. Adv. Math. 299, 396–450 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Chatterjee, S., Varadhan, S.R.S.: The large deviation principle for the Erdős–Rényi random graph. Eur. J. Comb. 32(7), 1000–1017 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chowdhury, M.B.R.: Universality in prelimiting tail behavior for regular subgraph counts in the Poisson regime. arXiv:2304.01162 (2023)

  15. Cook, N., Dembo, A.: Large deviations of subgraph counts for sparse Erdős–Rényi graphs. Adv. Math. 373, 107289 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Demarco, B., Kahn, J.: Tight upper tail bounds for cliques. Random Struct. Algorith. 41(4), 469–487 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. DeMarco, B., Kahn, J.: Upper tails for triangles. Random Struct. Algorith. 40(4), 452–459 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Harel, M., Mousset, F., Samotij, W.: Upper tails via high moments and entropic stability. Duke Math. J. 171(10), 2089–2192 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Janson, S., Ruciński, A.: The infamous upper tail. Random Struct. Algorith. 20(3), 317–342 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Janson, S., Ruciński, A.: The deletion method for upper tail estimates. Combinatorica 24(4), 615–640 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Janson, S., Łuczak, T., Rucinski, A.: Random Graphs. Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization, Wiley-Interscience, New York (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Janson, S., Oleszkiewicz, K., Ruciński, A.: Upper tails for subgraph counts in random graphs. Israel J. Math. 142, 61–92 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Keevash, P.: Shadows and intersections: stability and new proofs. Adv. Math. 218(5), 1685–1703 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, J.H., Vu, V.H.: Divide and conquer martingales and the number of triangles in a random graph. Random Struct. Algorith. 24(2), 166–174 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Lubetzky, E., Zhao, Y.: On the variational problem for upper tails in sparse random graphs. Random Struct. Algorith. 50(3), 420–436 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Nathanson, M.B.: Elementary Methods in Number Theory, vol. 195. Springer, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reimer, D.: Proof of the van den Berg-Kesten conjecture. Comb. Probab. Comput. 9(1), 27–32 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Šileikis, M.: On the upper tail of counts of strictly balanced subgraphs. Electr. J. Comb. 20(3), 317–342 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Den Berg, J., Kesten, H.: Inequalities with applications to percolation and reliability. J. Appl. Probab. 22(3), 556–569 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Van, H.V.: A large deviation result on the number of small subgraphs of a random graph. Comb. Probab. Comput. 10(1), 79–94 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Warnke, L.: Upper tails for arithmetic progressions in random subsets. Israel J. Math. 221, 317–365 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Warnke, L.: On the missing log in upper tail estimates. J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 140, 98–146 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.G. thanks Sourav Chatterjee for mentioning to him the question of studying the upper tail of N, which he had learnt from David Aldous. S.G. also thanks Noga Alon and Wojciech Samotij for useful discussions and in particular for pointing him to the earlier appearances of versions of Proposition 3.7 in [23] and [18]. His research was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1855688, NSF CAREER grant DMS-1945172, and a Sloan Fellowship. E.H. was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1855688. K.N was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019R1A5A1028324, NRF-2019R1A6A1A10073887).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirshendu Ganguly.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganguly, S., Hiesmayr, E. & Nam, K. Upper Tail Behavior of the Number of Triangles in Random Graphs with Constant Average Degree. Combinatorica (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-024-00086-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-024-00086-3

Keywords

Navigation