Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A molecularly defined amygdala-independent tetra-synaptic forebrain-to-hindbrain pathway for odor-driven innate fear and anxiety

Abstract

Fear-related disorders (for example, phobias and anxiety) cause a substantial public health problem. To date, studies of the neural basis of fear have mostly focused on the amygdala. Here we identify a molecularly defined amygdala-independent tetra-synaptic pathway for olfaction-evoked innate fear and anxiety in male mice. This pathway starts with inputs from the olfactory bulb mitral and tufted cells to pyramidal neurons in the dorsal peduncular cortex that in turn connect to cholecystokinin-expressing (Cck+) neurons in the superior part of lateral parabrachial nucleus, which project to tachykinin 1-expressing (Tac1+) neurons in the parasubthalamic nucleus. Notably, the identified pathway is specifically involved in odor-driven innate fear. Selective activation of this pathway induces innate fear, while its inhibition suppresses odor-driven innate fear. In addition, the pathway is both necessary and sufficient for stress-induced anxiety-like behaviors. These findings reveal a forebrain-to-hindbrain neural substrate for sensory-triggered fear and anxiety that bypasses the amygdala.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: DP mediates odor-driven innate fear bypasses the amygdala.
Fig. 2: A molecularly defined tetra-synaptic pathway.
Fig. 3: The DPCamk2a+–anterior PBNslCck+ pathway mediates odor-driven innate fear.
Fig. 4: The anterior PBNslCck+–PSThTac1+ pathway mediates odor-driven innate fear.
Fig. 5: The disynaptic pathway controls odor-driven innate fear.
Fig. 6: The disynaptic pathway regulates stress-induced anxiety.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The MATLAB script of the single-cell Ca2+ signal data analysis is available as Supplementary Code 1.

References

  1. Tovote, P., Fadok, J. P. & Lüthi, A. Neuronal circuits for fear and anxiety. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 317–331 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gross, C. T. & Canteras, N. S. The many paths to fear. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 651–658 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Janak, P. H. & Tye, K. M. From circuits to behaviour in the amygdala. Nature 517, 284–292 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Root, C. M., Denny, C. A., Hen, R. & Axel, R. The participation of cortical amygdala in innate, odour-driven behaviour. Nature 515, 269–273 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Isosaka, T. et al. Htr2a-expressing cells in the central amygdala control the hierarchy between innate and learned fear. Cell 163, 1153–1164 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shang, C. et al. BRAIN CIRCUITS. A parvalbumin-positive excitatory visual pathway to trigger fear responses in mice. Science 348, 1472–1477 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei, P. et al. Processing of visually evoked innate fear by a non-canonical thalamic pathway. Nat. Commun. 6, 6756 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fadok, J. P. et al. A competitive inhibitory circuit for selection of active and passive fear responses. Nature 542, 96–100 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chou, X.-L. et al. Inhibitory gain modulation of defense behaviors by zona incerta. Nat. Commun. 9, 1151 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Han, S., Soleiman, M. T., Soden, M. E., Zweifel, L. S. & Palmiter, R. D. Elucidating an affective pain circuit that creates a threat memory. Cell 162, 363–374 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, M. L., Asada, N. & Malenka, R. C. Anterior cingulate inputs to nucleus accumbens control the social transfer of pain and analgesia. Science 371, 153–159 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Feinstein, J. S. et al. Fear and panic in humans with bilateral amygdala damage. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 270–272 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khalsa, S. S. et al. Panic anxiety in humans with bilateral Amygdala lesions: Pharmacological induction via cardiorespiratory interoceptive pathways. J. Neurosci. 36, 3559–3566 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bach, D. R., Hurlemann, R. & Dolan, R. J. Unimpaired discrimination of fearful prosody after amygdala lesion. Neuropsychologia 51, 2070–2074 (2013).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohman, A. & Mineka, S. Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychol. Rev. 108, 483–522 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kondoh, K. et al. A specific area of olfactory cortex involved in stress hormone responses to predator odours. Nature 532, 103–106 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dewan, A., Pacifico, R., Zhan, R., Rinberg, D. & Bozza, T. Non-redundant coding of aversive odours in the main olfactory pathway. Nature 497, 486–489 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, Y. et al. High-throughput sequencing of single neuron projections reveals spatial organization in the olfactory cortex. Cell 185, 4117–4134 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mori, K. & Sakano, H. Olfactory circuitry and behavioral decisions. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 83, 231–256 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva, B. A., Gross, C. T. & Gräff, J. The neural circuits of innate fear: detection, integration, action, and memorization. Learn. Mem. 23, 544–555 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez, R. C., Carvalho-Netto, E. F., Ribeiro-Barbosa, E. R., Baldo, M. V. C. & Canteras, N. S. Amygdalar roles during exposure to a live predator and to a predator-associated context. Neuroscience 172, 314–328 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Motta, S. C. et al. Dissecting the brain’s fear system reveals the hypothalamus is critical for responding in subordinate conspecific intruders. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4870–4875 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kataoka, N., Shima, Y., Nakajima, K. & Nakamura, K. A central master driver of psychosocial stress responses in the rat. Science 367, 1105–1112 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fendt, M., Endres, T., Lowry, C. A., Apfelbach, R. & McGregor, I. S. TMT-induced autonomic and behavioral changes and the neural basis of its processing. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 29, 1145–1156 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsuo, T. et al. Artificial hibernation/life-protective state induced by thiazoline-related innate fear odors. Commun. Biol. 4, 101 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tseng, Y.-T. et al. The subthalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons mediate adaptive REM-sleep responses to threat. Neuron 110, 1223–1239 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garfield, A. S. et al. A parabrachial-hypothalamic cholecystokinin neurocircuit controls counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia. Cell Metab. 20, 1030–1037 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Miyamichi, K. et al. Cortical representations of olfactory input by trans-synaptic tracing. Nature 472, 191–196 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Canteras, N. S. The medial hypothalamic defensive system: hodological organization and functional implications. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 71, 481–491 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Butler, R. K. et al. Activation of phenotypically-distinct neuronal subpopulations of the rat amygdala following exposure to predator odor. Neuroscience 175, 133–144 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dielenberg, R. A., Hunt, G. E. & McGregor, I. S. “When a rat smells a cat”: the distribution of Fos immunoreactivity in rat brain following exposure to a predatory odor. Neuroscience 104, 1085–1097 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Govic, A. & Paolini, A. G. In vivo electrophysiological recordings in amygdala subnuclei reveal selective and distinct responses to a behaviorally identified predator odor. J. Neurophysiol. 113, 1423–1436 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang, W. et al. Fear induced neuronal alterations in a genetic model of depression: an fMRI study on awake animals. Neurosci. Lett. 489, 74–78 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kessler, M. S. et al. fMRI fingerprint of unconditioned fear-like behavior in rats exposed to trimethylthiazoline. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 22, 222–230 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fendt, M. & Endres, T. 2,3,5-Trimethyl-3-thiazoline (TMT), a component of fox odor—just repugnant or really fear-inducing? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 32, 1259–1266 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fendt, M., Endres, T. & Apfelbach, R. Temporary inactivation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis but not of the amygdala blocks freezing induced by trimethylthiazoline, a component of fox feces. J. Neurosci. 23, 23–28 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Müller, M. & Fendt, M. Temporary inactivation of the medial and basolateral amygdala differentially affects TMT-induced fear behavior in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 167, 57–62 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang, W. Z. et al. Parabrachial neuron types categorically encode thermoregulation variables during heat defense. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb9414 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kang, S. J. et al. A central alarm system that gates multi-sensory innate threat cues to the amygdala. Cell Rep. 40, 111222 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu, C. et al. Posterior subthalamic nucleus (PSTh) mediates innate fear-associated hypothermia in mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2648 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Goto, M. & Swanson, L. W. Axonal projections from the parasubthalamic nucleus. J. Comp. Neurol. 469, 581–607 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ciriello, J., Solano-Flores, L. P., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Kirouac, G. J. & Babic, T. Medullary pathways mediating the parasubthalamic nucleus depressor response. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 294, R1276–R1284 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shah, T., Dunning, J. L. & Contet, C. At the heart of the interoception network: influence of the parasubthalamic nucleus on autonomic functions and motivated behaviors. Neuropharmacology 204, 108906 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim, J. H. et al. A discrete parasubthalamic nucleus subpopulation plays a critical role in appetite suppression. eLife 11, e75470 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Barbier, M. et al. A basal ganglia-like cortical-amygdalar-hypothalamic network mediates feeding behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 15967–15976 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Blanchard, D. C. & Blanchard, R. J. Ethoexperimental approaches to the biology of emotion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 39, 43–68 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Calhoon, G. G. & Tye, K. M. Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1394–1404 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Battaglia, M. & Ogliari, A. Anxiety and panic: from human studies to animal research and back. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 29, 169–179 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, Y. et al. Large-scale forward genetics screening identifies Trpa1 as a chemosensor for predator odor-evoked innate fear behaviors. Nat. Commun. 9, 2041 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jiang, Y. et al. Molecular profiling of activated olfactory neurons identifies odorant receptors for odors in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1446–1454 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kobayakawa, K. et al. Innate versus learned odour processing in the mouse olfactory bulb. Nature 450, 503–508 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, H. et al. Incerta-thalamic circuit controls nocifensive behavior via cannabinoid type 1 receptors. Neuron 107, 538–551 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Li, K.-X. et al. Neuregulin 1 regulates excitability of fast-spiking neurons through Kv1.1 and acts in epilepsy. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 267–273 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zong, W. et al. Fast high-resolution miniature two-photon microscopy for brain imaging in freely behaving mice. Nat. Methods 14, 713–719 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pliota, P. et al. Stress peptides sensitize fear circuitry to promote passive coping. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 428–441 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gehrlach, D. A. et al. Aversive state processing in the posterior insular cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1424–1437 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Otsuka, S. Predator odor-induced freezing test for mice. Bio Protoc. 7, e2534 (2017).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pérez-Gómez, A. et al. Innate predator odor aversion driven by parallel olfactory subsystems that converge in the ventromedial hypothalamus. Curr. Biol. 25, 1340–1346 (2015).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, L., Chen, I. Z. & Lin, D. Collateral pathways from the ventromedial hypothalamus mediate defensive behaviors. Neuron 85, 1344–1358 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhu, Z. et al. A substantia innominata-midbrain circuit controls a general aggressive response. Neuron 109, 1540–1553 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Shen, C.-J. et al. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the amygdalar cholecystokinin glutamatergic afferents to nucleus accumbens modulate depressive-like behavior. Nat. Med. 25, 337–349 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chaplan, S. R., Bach, F. W., Pogrel, J. W., Chung, J. M. & Yaksh, T. L. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J. Neurosci. Methods 53, 55–63 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. François, A. et al. A brainstem-spinal cord inhibitory circuit for mechanical pain modulation by GABA and enkephalins. Neuron 93, 822–839 (2017).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Toledo-Rodriguez, M. & Markram, H. Single-cell RT–PCR, a technique to decipher the electrical, anatomical, and genetic determinants of neuronal diversity. Methods Mol. Biol. 403, 123–139 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Yu, X.-D. et al. Distinct serotonergic pathways to the amygdala underlie separate behavioral features of anxiety. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 1651–1663 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dong, P. et al. A novel cortico-intrathalamic circuit for flight behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 941–949 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lischinsky, J. E. et al. Transcriptionally defined amygdala subpopulations play distinct roles in innate social behaviors. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 2131–2146 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Core Facilities of Zhejiang University Institute of Neuroscience for technical assistance, the Chuanqi Research and Development Centre of Zhejiang University and the Nanjing Brain Observatory for miniaturized two-photon microscope and data processing services. We also thank the Integration Platform for Clinical and Scientific Research on Psychiatric Disorders of the Affiliated Mental Health Center/Hangzhou Seventh People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. This work was supported by the STI 2030 Major Projects (no. 2021ZD0202700 to X.-M.L.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 82090030, 82090031 and 82288101 to X.-M.L.; 82001186 to H.W.; no. 31900723 to Q.W.; no. 32071022 to S.C.), the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (no. 2023-PT310-01), the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Guangdong Joint Fund (no. U20A6005 to H.L.) and the Projects for Hangzhou Medical Disciplines of Excellence & Key Project for Hangzhou Medical Disciplines.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.W. and X.-M.L. initiated and designed the research and wrote the manuscript. H.W., Q.W., L.C. and X.F. performed all the experiments and analyzed the results. P.D. helped analyze the microendoscopic Ca2+ imaging results. L.T. and L.L. assisted with the histology and behavior experiments. H.L., S.C. and H.H. helped collect the fiber photometry data and interpret the results. P.C. contributed to the discussion of the results. X.-M.L. supervised the entire project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Ming Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Neuroscience thanks Avishek Adhikari and Richard Palmiter for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Whole brain Fos expression, activities of DP exposed to different odors, glomerular tracing from serial coronal sections of MOB, and DP-projection mitral cells in MOB.

a, Typical images of taCasp3 induced cell apoptosis in BLA and CeA, CoA and MeA. b, Average escape speed curves (before and after exiting area 1 within 1 s, dotted lines indicate the point when mice exit from area 1). c, Typical image of Fos expression in OB, amygdala, and parabrachial nucleus. d, Quantification of Fos expression throughout the brain. e, Relative fold change of Fos expression throughout the brain. f, Typical image of Fos expressing neurons stained with CamkII, and quantification of co-expression ratio. g, Typical images of Fos expression in DP of mice exposed to different odors. h, Typical image of retrograde virus mixed with CTB injection in DP. i & j, For each coronal section, labeled glomeruli (in red) and unlabeled glomeruli (in white, identified by DAPI staining in blue) were individually traced in Adobe Illustrator. k, Example of glomerular tracing from serial coronal sections of MOB. l, Typical examples of trans-synaptically labelled mitral cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. m, Typical image of retrograde labeled neurons in MOB co-expressed with tdT and Slc17a7, and quantification of co-expression ratio. n, Typical image of retrograde labeled neurons in MOB co-expressed with tdT and Pcdh21, and quantification of co-expression ratio. o, Schematic and typical image for retrograde virus mixed with CTB injection in PrL and IL, and no tdT-labeled neurons were observed in MOB. Scale bar, 200 μm; Zoom, 50 μm. For (d) and (e), n = 5 brain slices from 3 mice for each group; For (f), (m), and (n), n = 6 brain slices from 3 mice. All statistical tests are two-tailed. Unpaired t test for (d). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; N.S., not significant. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 1 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Virus functional verification, photostimulation of CoA in flight-to-shelter assay, and activation of DP induced autonomic system changes.

a & b, Typical images of taCasp3-induced apoptosis in DP (a) and CoA (b), and summarized data for number of neurons. Scale bar, 200 μm. c, Average escape speed curves (before and after exiting area 1 within 1 s, dotted line indicates the point when mice exit from area 1). d, Schematic of virus injection and typical images of ChR2-EYFP expression in DP and CoA. Scale bar, 200 μm. e & f, Representative traces of inward currents, action potential firing (e), and quantification of firing rate (f) evoked by optogenetic stimulation in acute brain slices containing DP. g-j, Representative trajectory chart (g), escape speed (h), escape percentage (i), and exploration time in areas A and C of CoA activation (j). k & l, Summarized data of normalized pupil size (k) and heart rate (l) of DP activation. For (a) and (b), n = 6 brain slices from 3 mice for each group; For (f), n = 3 patched neurons; For (h)-(l), n = 8 mice per group. All statistical tests are two-tailed. Unpaired t test for (a), (b), (i), and (j); A repeated two-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (h); A repeated one-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (k) and (l). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; N.S., not significant. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 2 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Virus functional verification, and comparation of opto-silencing of MOB→DP and MOB→CoA circuit for innate fear.

a, Optogenetic inhibition of MOB → OP / MOB→CoA pathway and representative images of NpHR-EYFP expression in MOB. b, Representative traces of optogenetic inhibitory effects of NpHR-expressing virus. c, Axonal terminals and fiber tracks in DP and CoA. d, Schematic of optogenetic inhibition of open field test. e & f, Average speed of opto-silencing of MOB → DP (e) and MOB→CoA (f) pathway for open field test. g, Schematic of optogenetic inhibition of TMT test. h, Representative trajectory chart of Control and MOB → DP pathway opto-silencing mice exposed to TMT. i-n, Average escape speed curves (i, dotted lines indicate the point when mice exit from area 1), escape speed (j), escape percentage (k), time in area 1 (l), aversion index (m), and freezing time percentage (n). o, Representative trajectory chart of Control and MOB→CoA pathway opto-silencing mice exposed to TMT. p-u, Average escape speed curves (p, dotted lines indicate the point when mice exit from area 1), escape speed (q), escape percentage (r), time in area 1 (s), aversion index (t), and freezing time percentage (u). v & w, Retro-AAV virus injection (v), representative images of EGFP and mCherry expression in MOB, and co-expression ratio quantification (w). Some merged yellow dotted substances were spontaneous tissue fluorescence. x, Representative trajectory chart of CoA and MeA lesion with laser OFF mice for day 1. y, Average escape speed curves (dotted lines indicate the point when mice exit from area 1). For all the representative images (a), (c), and (w), Scale bar, 200 μm; Zoom, 50 μm. For (e), (f), (j)-(n), and (q)-(u), n = 12 mice per group; For (w), n = 12 brain slices from 3 mice. All statistical tests are two-tailed. A repeated two-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (e), (f), (j)-(n), and (q)-(u). *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; N.S., not significant. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 3 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Detailed features of MOBSlc17a7+→DPCamk2a+→anterior PBNslCck+→PSThTac1+ pathway.

a, Typical image of axonal terminals in posterior PBNsl and quantification of fluorescence intensity. b, Typical images of retrograde virus mixed with CTB injection in anterior and posterior PBNsl. c, Typical image of tdT-labeled neurons in DP from posterior PBNsl. d, Typical image of tdT co-labeled with Cck in posterior PBNsl, and percentage quantification. e, Typical image of starter cells in posterior PBNsl. f, DsRed-expressing neurons in DP from posterior PBNsl and quantification of labeled cell number. g, Schematic of axonal terminal staining. h, Typical images of axonal terminals from DP overlapping with Cck, Tac1, and CGRP in anterior and posterior PBNsl. i, Schematic of crossing Cck-Cre and Rosa26-tdTomato reporter mice, typical image of tdT-labeled neurons stained with Cck, and co-expression ratio quantification. j-n, Typical images of tdT-labeled neurons stained with Slc17a6 (j), Gad2 (k), CGRP (l), Tac1 (m), and CaMKII (n), and co-expression ratio quantification. o-q, Representative traces and summarized data for light-evoked EPSCs recorded in anterior PBNslCck+ neurons (o), DP (p), and PSTh (q). r-t, Typical images of tdT-labeled neurons stained with CaMKII (r), Gad2 (s), and Crf (t), and quantification of co-expression ratio. u, Schematic of axonal terminal staining and typical image of axonal terminals from anterior PBNsl overlapping with Tac1 in PSTh. v, Typical image of EYFP-labeled neurons stained with Cck and co-expression ratio quantification. w, Representative traces and summarized data for light-evoked EPSCs recorded in PSTh. For all the typical images, Scale bar, 100 μm. All statistical tests are two-tailed. For (a), (d), (f), (i)-(n), (t), and (v), n = 6 brain slices from 3 mice; (o)-(q), n = 12 patched neurons from 3 mice; For (r) and (s), n = 8 brain slices from 3 mice; For (w), n = 11 patched neurons from 3 mice. Unpaired t test for (a) and (f); A repeated one-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (o)-(q), and (w). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 4 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 DP→anterior PBNsl circuit mediates odor-driven innate fear but not visually and auditorily evoked innate fear.

a, Typical GCaMP6s fluorescence and fiber track in DP. Scale bar, 100 μm. b, Average calcium signals and heatmap in mice exposed to peanut oil and low concentration of TMT. c, Multicurve presentation and area under the curve (AUC) of calcium activity in DP. d & e, Representative traces of mice receiving two repeated TMT stimuli (d) and peak delta F/F (e). f, Schematic of olfactory-deprived test and summarized data for latency to find food. g-k, Representative trajectory chart (g), escape percentage (h), time in area 1 (i), aversion index (j), and freezing time percentage (k). l, Average calcium signals of control and olfactory-deprived mice exposed to TMT, peak delta F/F, and AUC of calcium activity. m, Schematic of looming test and average calcium signals of mice under escape, frozen, and unresponsive conditions. n, Peak delta F/F and AUC of calcium activity for looming test. o, Schematic of auditorily evoked innate fear and average calcium signals of mice under escape, frozen, and unresponsive conditions. p, Peak delta F/F and AUC of calcium activity for auditorily evoked innate fear. q, Average speed of opto-silencing of DP→PBNsl pathway for open field test. r, Representative trajectory chart of DP→PBNsl pathway for day 1 laser OFF tests. s, Average escape speed curves (dotted lines indicate the point when mice exit from area 1). t, Typical images of pupil, average curves and summarized data of normalized pupil size. u, Average curves and summarized data of normalized heart rate. All statistical tests are two-tailed. For (c), (l), (n), and (p), n = 10 trials from 5 mice; For (e), n = 7 mice from 14 trials; For (f) and (h)-(k), n = 10 mice per group; For (q), n = 12 mice per group; For (t), n = 13 mice per group; For (u), n = 12 mice per group. One-way ANOVA with bonferroni post hoc test for (c), (n), and (p). Paired t test for (e); Unpaired t test for (f), and (h)-(l); A repeated two-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (q); A repeated one-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (t) and (u). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; N.S., not significant. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 5 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Anterior rather than posterior PBNslCck+ neurons contribute to odor-driven innate fear but not in visually and auditorily evoked innate fear.

a, Typical images of tdT-labeled neurons co-expressed with Fos and co-labeled percentage in anterior PBNsl. b, Typical images of Fos expression in posterior PBNsl and quantification of Fos number. c, Typical image of Fos co-labeled with tdT in posterior PBNsl, and percentage quantification. d, Schematic of virus injection and fiber implant, typical image of anterior PBNslCck+ neurons expressing GCaMP6s, and representative traces of calcium signals. e-h, Schematic of virus injection (e), average calcium signals / heatmap (f), multicurve presentation (g), peak delta F/F and AUC of calcium activity of anterior PBNslCck+ neurons (h) in mice exposed to TMT and water and DP-lesioned mice with TMT treatment. i, Schematic of virus injection, typical image of posterior PBNslCck+ neurons expressing GCaMP6s, and average calcium signals of TMT stimuli. j & l, Average calcium signals of mice under escape, frozen, and unresponsive conditions for looming (j) and auditorily (l) evoked innate fear. k & m, Peak delta F/F and AUC of calcium activity for looming (k) and auditorily (m) evoked innate fear. n, Schematic of virus injection, typical image of anterior PBNslGad2+ neurons expressing GCaMP6s, and average calcium signals. o, Heatmap of calcium transients of natural fox urine, male mice urine and peanut oil stimulations. p, Percentage of neurons excited (red), inhibited (blue), or with no response to odor (gray). q, Anterior to posterior brain slices from mouse following GCaMP6s virus injection into anterior PBNsl. r & s, Overlay of GCaMP6s virus expression (green), fibers (blue) and lens (yellow) positions. For all the typical images, Scale bar, 100 μm; Zoom, 50 μm. All statistical tests are two-tailed. For (a)-(c), n = 5 brain slices from 3 mice per group; (h), (k), and (m), n = 10 trials from 5 mice. Unpaired t test for (a) and (b); One-way ANOVA with bonferroni post hoc test for (h), (k), and (m). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; N.S., not significant. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 6 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Effects of anterior PBNslCck+ neuron ablation on TMT-induced innate fear and virus targeting.

a, Average speed of opto-silencing of PBNslCck+ neurons for open field test. b, Representative trajectory chart of PBNslCck+ neurons for day 1 laser OFF tests. c, Average escape speed curves (dotted line indicates the point when mice exit from area 1). d, Schematic of virus injection, typical images of taCasp3-induced apoptosis, and number of anterior PBNslCck+ neurons. Scale bar, 100 μm. ek, Representative trajectory chart (e), average escape speed curves (f), escape speed (g), escape percentage (h), time in area 1 (i), aversion index (j), and freezing time percentage (k). l, Typical images of pupil. m, Average curves and summarized data of normalized pupil size. n, Average curves and summarized data of normalized heart rate. o & p, Anterior to posterior brain slices from mouse following NpHR-EYFP (o) or ChR2-EYFP (p) virus injection into anterior PBNsl and overlay of virus expression. Scale bar, 200 μm. All statistical tests are two-tailed. For (a), n = 12 mice per group; (d), n = 6 brain slices from 3 mice per group; For (g)-(k), n = 11 mice per group; For (m), n = 10 mice for EYFP group / n = 13 mice for ChR2 group; For (n), n = 10 mice for EYFP group / n = 12 mice for ChR2 group. A repeated two-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (a); Unpaired t test for (d), and (g)-(k). Repeated one-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (m) and (n). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; N.S., not significant. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 7 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Anterior PBNslCck+→PSTh circuit mediates odor-driven innate fear and PSTh acts as a main downstream target of anterior PBNslCck+ neurons.

a, CTB injection and typical image of CTB targeting in PSTh. Scale bar, 100 μm. b, Typical images of Fos, tdT and CTB co-labeled in anterior PBNsl, and co-expression percentage. Scale bar, 50 μm. c & d, Multicurve presentation (c) and AUC of calcium activity of PSTh-projecting anterior PBNslCck+ neurons (d). e, Representative image of axonal terminal in PSTh with fiber track. Scale bar, 100 μm. f, Average speed of opto-silencing of PBNslCck+→PSTh pathway for open field test. g, Representative trajectory chart of PBNslCck+→PSTh pathway for day 1 laser OFF tests. h, Average escape speed curves (dotted line indicates the point when mice exit from area 1). i, Typical images of pupil. j. Average curves, and summarized data of normalized pupil size. k, Average curves and summarized data of normalized heart rate. l & m, Virus injection (l), typical images of taCasp3-induced apoptosis, and number of neurons in PSTh (m). Scale bar, 100 μm. n-q, Representative trajectory chart (n), escape speed (o), escape percentage (p), and time in areas A and C (q). All statistical tests are two-tailed. For (b) and (m), n = 6 brain slices from 3 mice per group; For (d), n = 10 trials from 5 mice; For (f), n = 12 mice per group; For (j), n = 10 mice for EYFP group / n = 13 mice for ChR2 group; For (k), n = 10 mice for EYFP group / n = 12 mice for ChR2 group; For (o)-(q), n = 8 mice per group. Unpaired t test for (b), (d), (m), (p), and (q); A repeated two-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (f) and (o); A repeated one-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (j) and (k). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; N.S., not significant. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 8 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Activities of PSThTac1+ neurons in odor-driven innate fear, virus targeting in PSTh, and downstream target mapping.

a, Typical images of TMT exposure-induced Fos expression in PSTh and quantification of Fos number. Scale bar, 100 μm; Zoom, 50 μm. b, Typical images of tdT-labeled neurons co-expressed with Fos and co-labeled percentage in PSTh. Scale bar, 100 μm; Zoom, 50 μm. c & d, Multicurve presentation (c) and AUC of calcium activity of PSThTac1+ neurons (d). e, Average speed of opto-silencing of PSThTac1+ neurons for open field test. f, Representative trajectory chart of PSThTac1+ neurons for day 1 laser OFF tests. g, Average escape speed curves (dotted lines indicate the point when mice exit from area 1). h, Typical images of pupil. i, Average curves and summarized data of normalized pupil size. j, Average curves and summarized data of normalized heart rate. k & l, Anterior to posterior brain slices from mouse following NpHR-EYFP (k) or ChR2-EYFP (l) virus injection into PSTh and overlay of virus expression. Scale bar, 200 μm. m, EYFP expression in several downstream structures from PSThTac1+ neurons. Scale bar, 100 μm. All statistical tests are two-tailed. For (a), n = 7 brain slices from 3 mice per group; For (b), n = 5 brain slices from 3 mice per group; For (d), n = 10 trials from 5 mice; For (e), n = 12 mice per group; For (i), n = 10 mice for EYFP group / n = 12 mice for ChR2 group; For (j), n = 10 mice for EYFP group / n = 9 mice for ChR2 group. Unpaired t test for (a), (b), and (d); A repeated two-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (e); A repeated one-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (i) and (j). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; N.S., not significant. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 9 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10 Effects of ablation of specific amygdala nuclei on DP→anterior PBNsl→PSTh circuit-triggered innate fear and pain threshold.

a, Average speed of opto-silencing of DP→anterior PBNsl→PSTh pathway for open field test. b, Representative trajectory chart of DP→anterior PBNsl→PSTh pathway for day 1 laser OFF tests. c, Average escape speed curves (dotted lines indicate the point when mice exit from area 1). d, Schematic of virus injection and strategy for optogenetic manipulation of DP→anterior PBNsl→PSTh triple pathway. Symbol “&” means “and”. e, Typical images of pupil. f & g, Average curves (f) and summarized data of normalized pupil size (g). h & i, Average curves (h) and summarized data of normalized heart rate (i) amygdala-ablated mice when triple pathway activated. j & k, Anterior to posterior brain slices from mouse following Cre/Flp-dependent virus expressing NpHR-EYFP (j) or ChR2-EYFP (k) injection into anterior PBNsl and overlay of virus expression. Scale bar, 200 μm. l, Schematic of pain threshold tests including von Frey and Hargreaves test. m & n, Effects of activation of triple pathway on mechanical (m) and thermal (n) thresholds. All statistical tests are two-tailed. For (a), (m), and (n), n = 12 mice per group; For (g), n = 10 mice for EYFP group / 12 mice for ChR2 group and ChR2 + lesion group; For (i), n = 10 mice for EYFP group / 12 mice for ChR2 group and ChR2 + lesion group. A repeated two-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (a), (m), and (n); A repeated one-way ANOVA measures with bonferroni post hoc test for (g) and (i). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; N.S., not significant. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. See Extended Source Data Fig. 10 for more detailed statistics.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Behavioral differences of control, DP-lesioned and CoA-lesioned mice exposed to the TMT stimulus.

Supplementary Video 2

Activation of the pyramidal neurons in DP-elicited escape behavior and the CoA activation-induced aversion effect.

Supplementary Video 3

Activation of the pyramidal neurons in DP rapidly enlarged pupil size.

Supplementary Video 4

Axonal terminals from the MOB overlapped with apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons in DP projecting to PBNslCck+ neurons.

Supplementary Video 5

In vivo fiber photometry recordings of the anterior PBNsl-projecting DP neuronal activity for the TMT stimulus.

Supplementary Video 6

In vivo fiber photometry recordings of the anterior PBNslCck+ neuronal activity for the TMT stimulus.

Supplementary Video 7

Microendoscopic Ca2+ imaging of the anterior PBNslCck+ neuronal activity for the TMT stimulus.

Supplementary Video 8

In vivo fiber photometry recordings of PSThTac1+ neuronal activity for the TMT stimulus.

Supplementary Video 9

Activation of the DP→anterior PBNsl→PSTh pathway induced a decrease in the number of active nose pokes paired with sucrose.

Supplementary Code 1

Single-cell Ca2+ signal code.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2p

Unprocessed gels for Fig.2p.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Wang, Q., Cui, L. et al. A molecularly defined amygdala-independent tetra-synaptic forebrain-to-hindbrain pathway for odor-driven innate fear and anxiety. Nat Neurosci 27, 514–526 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01562-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01562-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing