Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:14:07.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiment commensurability does not necessitate research consolidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2024

Milena Tsvetkova*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK m.tsvetkova@lse.ac.uk http://tsvetkova.me
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Integrative experiment design promises to foster cumulative knowledge by changing how we design experiments, build theories, and conduct research. I support the push to increase commensurability across experimental research but raise several reservations regarding results-driven and large-team-based research. I argue that it is vital to preserve academic diversity and adversarial debate via independent efforts.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almaatouq, A., Alsobay, M., Yin, M., & Watts, D. J. (2021). Task complexity moderates group synergy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(36), e2101062118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101062118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almaatouq, A., Rahimian, M. A., Burton, J. W., & Alhajri, A. (2022). The distribution of initial estimates moderates the effect of social influence on the wisdom of the crowd. Scientific Reports, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20551-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killingsworth, M. A., Kahneman, D., & Mellers, B. (2023). Income and emotional well-being: A conflict resolved. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(10), e2208661120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208661120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao, A., Mason, W., Suri, S., & Watts, D. J. (2016). An experimental study of team size and performance on a complex task. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0153048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427430. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11467CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spadaro, G., Tiddi, I., Columbus, S., Jin, S., ten Teije, A., CoDa Team, & Balliet, D. (2022). The Cooperation Databank: Machine-readable science accelerates research synthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(5), 14721489. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211053319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straub, V. J., Tsvetkova, M., & Yasseri, T. (2023). The cost of coordination can exceed the benefit of collaboration in performing complex tasks. Collective Intelligence, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137231156912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsvetkova, M., Wagner, C., & Mao, A. (2018). The emergence of inequality in social groups: Network structure and institutions affect the distribution of earnings in cooperation games. PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0200965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed