Skip to main content
Download PDF

The chemical characteristics of different sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate sources and their relative bioavailabilities for broilers fed with a conventional corn-soybean meal diet

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 15, Article number: 16 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Our previous studies demonstrated that divalent organic iron (Fe) proteinate sources with higher complexation or chelation strengths as expressed by the greater quotient of formation (Qf) values displayed higher Fe bioavailabilities for broilers. Sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA) is a trivalent organic Fe source with the strongest chelating ligand EDTA. However, the bioavailability of Fe when administered as NaFeEDTA in broilers and other agricultural animals remains untested. Herein, the chemical characteristics of 12 NaFeEDTA products were determined. Of these, one feed grade NaFeEDTA (Qf = 2.07 × 108), one food grade NaFeEDTA (Qf = 3.31 × 108), and one Fe proteinate with an extremely strong chelation strength (Fe-Prot ES, Qf value = 8,590) were selected. Their bioavailabilities relative to Fe sulfate (FeSO4·7H2O) for broilers fed with a conventional corn-soybean meal diet were evaluated during d 1 to 21 by investigating the effects of the above Fe sources and added Fe levels on the growth performance, hematological indices, Fe contents, activities and gene expressions of Fe-containing enzymes in various tissues of broilers.

Results

NaFeEDTA sources varied greatly in their chemical characteristics. Plasma Fe concentration (PI), transferrin saturation (TS), liver Fe content, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activities in liver, heart, and kidney, catalase (CAT) activity in liver, and SDH mRNA expressions in liver and kidney increased linearly (P < 0.05) with increasing levels of Fe supplementation. However, differences among Fe sources were detected (P < 0.05) only for PI, liver Fe content, CAT activity in liver, SDH activities in heart and kidney, and SDH mRNA expressions in liver and kidney. Based on slope ratios from multiple linear regressions of the above indices on daily dietary analyzed Fe intake, the average bioavailabilities of Fe-Prot ES, feed grade NaFeEDTA, and food grade NaFeEDTA relative to the inorganic FeSO4·7H2O (100%) for broilers were 139%, 155%, and 166%, respectively.

Conclusions

The bioavailabilities of organic Fe sources relative to FeSO4·7H2O were closely related to their Qf values, and NaFeEDTA sources with higher Qf values showed higher Fe bioavailabilities for broilers fed with a conventional corn-soybean meal diet.

Background

As an essential trace element, iron (Fe) plays an important role in the appearance and maintenance of life on Earth [1]. Almost all living organisms require Fe to complete oxygen transport, cell proliferation and differentiation, immunity, and energy metabolism, highlighting the importance of this crucial element for physiological and biological processes [2]. Two kinds of Fe are present in food, namely, heme Fe and non-heme Fe [3]. Heme Fe can be directly absorbed by duodenal mucosal cells through endocytosis, while non-heme Fe mainly exists in the form of inorganic salts or oxides and cannot be absorbed effectively [4, 5]. The Fe ions in non-heme Fe need to be unified into Fe2+ under the operation of the redox system of duodenal mucosal cells, thus enabling them to enter into enterocytes via the transport of divalent metal transporter 1 [6, 7]. Moreover, Fe2+ entering the cells needs to be oxidized into Fe3+ before it can combine with transferrin and be utilized by the whole body through the blood circulation [8]. Therefore, selecting a high-quality dietary Fe source is especially important for animals to ensure its absorption, bioavailability, metabolic homeostasis, and normal growth.

For broiler chickens, traditionally, the Fe additives in diets are mainly inorganic salts. However, because of the shortcomings of inorganic Fe sources, such as low bioavailability, high hygroscopicity and vulnerability to destruction by other nutrients in diets, organic Fe sources have attracted increasing attention and gradually been developed and utilized as a substitute for inorganic Fe sources [9, 10]. Currently, a number of evidences have shown that under the protection of the ligand, the Fe ions in organic Fe sources could resist precipitation or adsorption of various inhibitors in the digestive tract, thus being better absorbed and utilized by intestinal epithelial cells [11]. Of note, in our previous studies, we have demonstrated that the relative bioavailabilities of divalent organic Fe sources in broilers are closely related to their complexation or chelation strengths as expressed by the quotient of formation (Qf) value (a quantitative measurement of complex or chelation strength) [12], and organic Fe proteinate sources with greater Qf values display higher Fe absorption and bioavailabilities [9, 10, 13,14,15,16]. Sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA) is a trivalent organic Fe source with the strongest chelating ligand EDTA. It has been widely used as a Fe supplement in human foods because it offers certain advantages, such as no irritation of the stomach and gut as well as high Fe absorption as it avoids interferences from phytic acid and other anti-nutritional factors in the gut [17,18,19]. However, the absorption and bioavailability of Fe when administered as NaFeEDTA, and whether NaFeEDTA is a suitable additive to diets as a dietary Fe supplement for broilers and other agricultural animals remain unexplored to date. Therefore, we hypothesized that the NaFeEDTA with the highest Qf value would be better than the inorganic Fe sulfate (FeSO4∙7H2O) and the organic Fe proteinate with an extremely strong chelation strength (Fe-Prot ES, Qf value = 8,590, [12]) in improving Fe bioavailability in broilers.

To test the above hypothesis, in the present study, we analyzed the chemical characteristics of different NaFeEDTA sources and investigated the effects of different Fe sources and added Fe levels on the growth performance, hematological indices, Fe contents, activities, and gene expressions of Fe-containing enzymes in various tissues of broilers so as to evaluate the bioavailabilities of different NaFeEDTA sources and Fe-Prot ES relative to FeSO4∙7H2O for broilers fed with a conventional corn-soybean meal diet from 1 to 21 days of age.

Methods

Fe sources

A total of 12 commercial NaFeEDTA products (4 feed grade and 8 food grade), 1 feed grade Fe-Prot ES, and 1 reagent grade FeSO4∙7H2O were purchased from several manufacturers or independent distributors.

Analysis of Fe contents in NaFeEDTA products

The total Fe contents in NaFeEDTA sources were analyzed by using the sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) titration method [20]. In brief, approximately 0.5 g of each NaFeEDTA product was weighed and added into an iodine flask; 40 mL of deionized water, 3.0 g of potassium iodide, and 20 mL of hydrochloric acid were added into the flask, and the mixture was shaken well and left to settle in the dark for about 5 min. Then, the mixed liquid was titrated with Na2S2O3 standard solution until the color of the solution changed to blue, and 2.0 mL of starch indicator solution was immediately added into the solution until the blue color disappeared. The total consumed volume of Na2S2O3 standard solution was V1 (mL). A blank solution with no sample was again titrated with Na2S2O3 according to the method described above, and the consumed volume V2 (mL) of Na2S2O3 standard solution was also recorded. The Fe content (W1) in NaFeEDTA was calculated using the following formula: \(\textrm{W}2=\frac{\frac{\textrm{V}1-\textrm{V}2}{100}\times \textrm{C}1\times \textrm{M}1}{\textrm{M}1}\) (C1 = 0.1005 mol/L is the molar concentration of Na2S2O3, and M1 = 55.8 g/mol is the molar mass of Fe). The average of the results from duplicate determinations was taken as the analyzed result of the Fe content in each NaFeEDTA source.

Determinations of EDTA, moisture, lead, and arsenic contents, solubilities, dissolution rates, and Qf values in NaFeEDTA sources

NaFeEDTA sources of which the Fe contents meet the national standard (12.5%–13.5% Fe contents) of food grade NaFeEDTA were selected for subsequent analyses of chemical characteristics [20]. The total EDTA content in each NaFeEDTA source was analyzed using the calcium acetate monohydrate (Ca(CH3COO)2·H2O) titration method [20]. In brief, approximately 0.8 g of each NaFeEDTA product was weighed and dissolved with 75 mL of ultrapure water in a 250 mL volumetric flask. Triethanolamine and sodium hydroxide solutions were added into the flask and the sample solution pH was adjusted to 12.5–13.0. Subsequently, 30 mg of hydroxynaphthol blue indicator was added into the volumetric flask and the mixed liquid was titrated with a Ca(CH3COO)2·H2O solution until the color of the solution changed from blue to red. The volume of the consumed Ca(CH3COO)2·H2O solution was V2, and the EDTA content (W2) was calculated using the following formula: \(\textrm{W}2=\frac{\textrm{V}2\times \textrm{C}2\times \textrm{M}2}{1,000\times \textrm{M}2}\) (C2 = 0.25 mol/L is the molar concentration of Ca(CH3COO)2·H2O, and M2 = 292.24 g/mol is the molar mass of EDTA). The moisture content of NaFeEDTA was analyzed using the drying method as described by Meng et al. [21]. The lead and arsenic contents were analyzed by using AOAC’s wet digestion method as described by the determination of multiple elements in National Food Safety Standards of China [22]. The Fe dissolution rate of Fe in NaFeEDTA in deionized H2O and the solubilities of NaFeEDTA in deionized H2O, 0.2 mol/L HCl-KCl buffer (pH 2.0), or 0.1 mol/L K2HPO4-KH2PO4 buffer (pH 5.0) were analyzed as described by Zhang et al. [12]. The average of the results from duplicate determinations was taken as the analyzed results of the EDTA content, moisture content, lead and arsenic contents, solubility, and dissolution rate of each NaFeEDTA source.

Finally, one feed grade NaFeEDTA and one food grade NaFeEDTA with similar total Fe contents, Fe dissolution rates, and solubilities were selected for the determination of Qf values. The Qf value of each NaFeEDTA source was determined using polarography with a hanging mercury drop electrode according to a previously described method [12]. The NaFeEDTA product was dissolved in deionized water to prepare a saturated NaFeEDTA solution with a Fe concentration of approximately 0.1 mol/L. Subsequently, the NaFeEDTA solution was diluted with 0.1 mol/L potassium sodium tartrate-ethylenediamine buffer solution (pH 12.0) to prepare of the final solution containing 1 × 10−3 mol/L Fe for anaerobic electrochemical measurements with a N purge. Meanwhile, a FeCl3·6H2O solution containing 1 × 10−3 mol/L Fe was prepared and used as the control. The half-wave potential (E1/2) of either the NaFeEDTA solution or the FeCl3·6H2O solution was measured by the 844 Professional VA (Metrohm Herisau, Switzerland). Their shift in half-wave potential (ΔE1/2) was used to calculate the Qf value as described by Zhang et al. [12]. The average of the results from triplicate determinations was taken as the analyzed result of the Qf value for each NaFeEDTA source. The results indicated that the Qf values of feed grade NaFeEDTA and food grade NaFeEDTA were 2.07 × 108 and 3.31 × 108, respectively.

Animals, diets, and experimental design

A total of 728 1-day-old Arbor Acres (AA) commercial male broiler chicks were randomly allotted by bodyweight to 1 of 13 treatments with 7 replicate cages (8 birds/cage). A completely randomized design was employed involving a 1 (control) + 4 (Fe sources) × 3 (added Fe levels) factorial arrangement of treatments. Birds were fed a Fe-unsupplemented corn-soybean meal basal diet (control, containing 67.90 mg of Fe/kg by analysis), and a basal diet supplemented with 20, 40, or 60 mg of Fe/kg from 1 of 4 Fe sources [reagent grade FeSO4∙7H2O, feed grade Fe-Prot ES (Qf value = 8,590), feed grade NaFeEDTA (Qf value = 2.07 × 108), or food grade NaFeEDTA (Qf value = 3.31 × 108)] for a duration of 21 d. All chicks were kept in electrically heated, thermostatically controlled, stainless-steel cages (90 cm × 70 cm × 45 cm) with waterers and feeders for 21 d. During this period, chicks were maintained at a 24 h-constant lighting and had free access to experimental diets and tap water (with no detectable Fe). Dead chicks were daily recorded, and bodyweight as well as feed intake of chicks per cage were measured at the beginning of the experiment and at 21 days of age to calculate the average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed to gain ratio (F/G) of birds from 1 to 21 days of age.

The basal corn-soybean meal diet (Table 1, containing 67.90 mg of Fe/kg by analysis) was formulated to meet or exceed the requirements of all other nutrients except for Fe for starter broilers, according to the recommendation of the Chinese Feeding Standard of Chicken [23]. According to the experimental treatments described above, the 4 Fe sources were added to the basal diet, respectively. The FeSO4∙7H2O was reagent grade (purity > 99%, 19.5% Fe by analysis), and the Fe-Prot ES was feed grade [10.16% Fe, 57.86% total amino acids (3.18% Lys, 0.68% Met, 0.28% Cys, 7.69% Asp, 2.35% Ser, 5.30% Glu, 0.70% Thr, 13.72% Gly, 1.51% Arg, 4.0% Ala, 8.80% Pro, 1.25% Val, 1.20% Phe, 0.60% Ile, 1.51% Leu, and 5.09% His), Qf value = 8,590 by analysis]. Both the FeSO4∙7H2O and the Fe-Prot ES were the same as in our previous study [12]. The feed grade NaFeEDTA (13.14% Fe, Qf value = 2.07 × 108 by analysis) and the food grade NaFeEDTA (13.14% Fe, Qf value = 3.31 × 108 by analysis) were the latest selected trivalent organic Fe sources with super extremely strong chelation strength. In addition, variable small amounts of L-lysine monohydrochloride or DL-methionine were added to respective experimental diets to balance the levels of lysine and methionine in all of 13 treatment diets. The analyzed Fe contents of diets are listed in Table 2. Diets were fed to birds in the mash form.

Table 1 Composition of the basal diet for 1- to 21-day-old broilers
Full size table
Table 2 Analyzed Fe contents in diets for 1- to 21-day-old broilers
Full size table

Sample collections and preparations

Before initiation of the trial, samples of feed ingredients and diets from 13 treatment groups were taken for analyses of dietary crude protein, Fe, and calcium (Ca) contents, and the tap water was collected to analyze the Fe content. At 21 days of age, 3 chicks were selected from each cage according to the mean bodyweight within the cage after a 12-h fast. Samples of blood were obtained from 3 birds through wing vein puncture. Part of these blood samples was immediately used to measure hemoglobin (Hb) concentration and hematocrit (Hct), and another part was centrifuged (3,000 × g, at 4 °C) for 15 min to harvest plasma and then stored at −20 °C until analyses of plasma Fe concentration (PI) and total Fe binding capacity (TIBC). Subsequently, these chicks were sacrificed to collect heart, liver, kidney, spleen, pancreas, and left tibia samples. Part of samples was stored at −20 °C to determine tissue Fe contents and activities of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), catalase (CAT), and cytochrome c oxidase (COX). And another part was deep-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C to detect SDH, CAT, and COX gene expression levels. Before analyses, the samples from 3 individual birds were pooled into 1 sample based on replicate cage, and thus each treatment had a total of 7 replicate samples.

Sample analyses

Determinations of Fe, Ca, and dietary crude protein contents

After wet digestions with HNO3 and HCIO4, Fe contents in feed ingredient, diet, water, and tissue samples as well as Ca contents in feed ingredient and diet samples were measured by the 5110 inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (Agilent Technologies Australia (M) Pty Ltd., Australia) as described previously [12, 24]. Yellow soybean powder (GBW 10013 (GSB-4), National Research Center of Standard Materials, Beijing, China) and pork liver powder (GBW 10051 (GSB-29), National Research Center of Standard Materials, Beijing, China) were used as standard references to validate the analyses of Fe and Ca contents. The crude protein contents in feed ingredient and diet samples were determined according to the methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [25].

Determinations of hematological indices and activities of Fe-containing enzymes in tissues

Hematological indices measured in the present study included Hb concentration, Hct, PI, TIBC, and transferrin saturation (TS), while activities of Fe-containing enzymes included CAT, SDH, and COX activities. The Hb concentration and Hct in fresh blood samples were determined by using automatic blood chemistry analyzer (MEK-8222 K, Optoelectronics). The PI and TIBC in blood plasma and activities of Fe-containing enzymes (CAT and SDH) in heart, liver, and kidney were measured using a microplate reader with commercial chemical testing kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The activity of COX in liver was determined by using an ELISA kit provided by Qiaodu Biotechnology Company, Shanghai, China. The TS in plasma was calculated according to the following equation: TS (%) = (PI/TIBC) × 100%, and the protein concentrations in tissue supernatants were measured using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) Protein Assay kit (catalog number 23225; Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).

Total RNA isolation and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was isolated from heart, liver, and kidney tissues using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the concentration and purity of RNA were estimated by using a spectrophotometer at 260/280 nm. First-strand cDNA for RT-qPCR was obtained using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis for RT-PCR kit (cat No. 18080–051, Invitrogen). After formulating the premix system diluted cDNA (1 μL), 2× SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (5 μL), ROX reference (0.2 μL), PCR-grade water (3.4 μL), and each primer (0.2 μL, 10 μmol/L), the quantification of mRNA expression was performed using the ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The primers of CAT, SDH, COX, β-actin, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA were synthesized by Generay Biotech (Shanghai, China) and are listed in Table 3. β-actin and GAPDH genes were used as internal reference genes to complete data normalization according to the 2-ΔΔCt method.

Table 3 Gene-special primers used in the real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR
Full size table

Protein extraction and Western blotting

Total protein was obtained from 50 mg of frozen liver samples according to the method previously described [26], and the concentration of extracted protein was determined via a BCA assay kit. Subsequently, each protein sample (40 or 60 μg/group) was loaded and separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels, blocked with 5% nonfat milk-TBST for 2 h at 37 °C, and incubated with primary antibodies CAT (Cat. No. A11780, ABclonal, 1:1,000), SDH (Cat. No. A10821, ABclonal, 1:1,000), COX (Cat. No. A7531, ABclonal, 1:1,000), and GAPDH (Cat. No. AC001, ABclonal, 1:1,000). On the second day, the membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with HRP-Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Cat. No. HX2031, Huaxingbio, 1:5,000). Finally, the bands were visualized on a chemiluminescence image scanner (Tanon). The ratio of CAT, SDH, or COX protein band intensity to the internal reference GAPDH protein band intensity was used to reflect the protein expression level.

Statistical analyses

Single degree of freedom contrast was used to test the differences of the data between all supplemental Fe treatments and the control, thus indicating the effect of Fe supplementation [27]. Data excluding the control group were further analyzed as a 4 × 3 (Fe source × added level) factorial arrangement of treatments by two-way ANOVA via the GLM procedure in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The statistical model included Fe source, added Fe level and their interaction. Orthogonal comparisons for the linear response of dependent variables to independent variables were used to establish the inferences about one (added Fe level) of the main effects. The relative bioavailability values of feed grade Fe-Prot ES, feed grade NaFeEDTA, and food grade NaFeEDTA were determined using FeSO4∙7H2O as standard source by slope ratio comparison from multiple linear regressions [28]. Moreover, the daily dietary Fe intake (based on Fe assays of diets) rather than added Fe levels was used as the independent variable to calculate the regressions. Slope ratios and their SE were assessed using the error propagation method as described by Littell et al. [29]. Differences between Fe sources were identified by differences in their respective regression coefficients. The replicate cage was regarded as the experimental unit, and the level of statistical significance was set at P <  0.05.

Results

Chemical characteristics of different NaFeEDTA sources

The results were shown in Table 4. Total Fe contents varied considerably across the 12 tested NaFeEDTA sources, ranging from the least of 2.58% in feed grade NaFeEDTA 3 to the highest of 13.33% in food grade NaFeEDTA 1. Only 5 NaFeEDTA products (2 feed grade and 3 food grade) had Fe contents that were within the 12.5%–13.5% range as specified by the national standard of food grade NaFeEDTA [20]. Further analyses of these 5 Fe products showed that the EDTA contents ranged from 68.50% to 70.16%; the molar ratios of EDTA and Fe were about 1:1; the range of moisture contents was 7.80%–8.59%, and heavy metals lead and arsenic contents remained 0.20 mg/kg. Meanwhile, the Fe dissolution rates of the 5 NaFeEDTA products in deionized H2O ranged from 68.26% to 83.05%, and their solubilities in deionized H2O and two buffers were high, ranging from 89.95% to 99.05%. Finally, the feed grade NaFeEDTA 2 and the food grade NaFeEDTA 4 were chosen for Qf value detection as they had the same Fe content as well as similar Fe dissolution rates and solubilities. The Qf values of the feed grade NaFeEDTA 2 and the food grade NaFeEDTA 4 were 2.07 × 108 and 3.31 × 108, respectively, indicating that the two NaFeEDTA sources had super extremely strong chelation strengths. Therefore, these two NaFeEDTA sources were used in the subsequent in vivo broiler experiment.

Table 4 Chemical characteristics of different NaFeEDTA sources
Full size table

Growth performance

Compared to the control, dietary Fe supplementation had no effect (P > 0.05) on ADG, ADFI, and F:G from 1 to 21 days of age; furthermore, Fe source, added Fe level, and their interaction did not affect (P > 0.47) all of the above indicators as described in our previous study [30].

Hematological indices

The results were shown in Table 5. Compared to the control, dietary Fe supplementation had no effect (P > 0.05) on Hb concentration, Hct and TIBC, but significantly increased (P < 0.05) PI and TS. The Hb concentration, Hct, PI, TIBC, and TS were not affected (P > 0.09) by the Fe source and the interaction between Fe source and added Fe level, but PI and TS were affected (P < 0.0001) by the added Fe level, and increased linearly (P < 0.0001) with increasing dietary Fe levels.

Table 5 Effects of dietary Fe on hematological indices of broilers on d 21
Full size table

Fe contents in tissues

The data were shown in Table 6. Compared to the control, dietary Fe addition had no effect (P > 0.05) on Fe contents in heart and tibia ash, but increased (P < 0.05) Fe contents in kidney and liver. The Fe contents in kidney and tibia ash were not affected (P > 0.05) by the Fe source, added Fe level, and their interaction. The Fe contents in heart and liver were affected (P < 0.01) by the Fe source. Chicks that received the diet supplemented with either feed grade NaFeEDTA or food grade NaFeEDTA had higher (P < 0.04) heart Fe contents than those fed with the diet supplemented with FeSO4∙7H2O; heart Fe contents were higher (P = 0.0065) for food grade NaFeEDTA than for Fe-Prot ES with no differences (P > 0.08) between FeSO4∙7H2O and Fe-Prot ES, Fe-Prot ES and feed grade NaFeEDTA, as well as feed grade NaFeEDTA and food grade NaFeEDTA. Compared to the chicks fed with the diet supplemented with FeSO4∙7H2O, the chicks fed the diets supplemented with the 3 organic Fe sources had increased (P < 0.04) Fe contents in liver, and no differences (P > 0.32) were observed among the 3 organic Fe sources. In addition, liver Fe content was affected (P = 0.0348) by added Fe level, and increased linearly (P < 0.0001) with increasing added Fe levels. Heart Fe content was not affected (P > 0.25) by added Fe level and the interaction between Fe source and added Fe level, and did not increase linearly (P > 0.06) with increasing added Fe levels.

Table 6 Effects of dietary Fe on Fe contents in tissues of broilers on d 21
Full size table

Activities of Fe-containing enzymes in tissues

The data were shown in Table 7. There were no differences (P > 0.05) in CAT activities in heart and kidney between the chicks fed with the control diet and those fed with all Fe-supplemented diets. The Fe source, added Fe level, and their interaction did not affect (P > 0.35) CAT activities in these two tissues. However, compared to the control, dietary Fe supplementation increased (P < 0.05) CAT, SDH, and COX activities in liver, and SDH activities in heart and kidney. Both liver CAT activity and kidney SDH activity were affected (P < 0.006) by Fe source. Compared to the FeSO4∙7H2O, the 3 organic Fe sources increased (P < 0.01) liver CAT activities, and either feed grade NaFeEDTA or food grade NaFeEDTA increased (P < 0.003) kidney SDH activities with no differences (P > 0.08) among the 3 organic Fe sources. No difference (P = 0.1631) was observed in kidney SDH activity between FeSO4∙7H2O and Fe-Prot ES either. The CAT, SDH and COX activities in liver, and SDH activities in heart and kidney were affected (P < 0.05) by the added Fe level, and increased linearly (P < 0.003) as the increase of added Fe levels. However, no effects (P > 0.16) were found regarding the interaction between Fe source and added Fe level on the above 5 indices and Fe source on SDH activities in heart and liver and liver COX activity.

Table 7 Effects of dietary Fe on activities of tissue Fe-containing enzymes of broilers on d 21
Full size table

mRNA expression levels

The data were shown in Table 8. Compared with the control, dietary Fe supplementation had no effect (P > 0.05) on CAT and COX mRNA expression levels in heart, kidney, and liver, as well as SDH mRNA in heart, but increased (P < 0.05) mRNA expression levels of SDH in kidney and liver. The mRNA expression levels of heart CAT and SDH in kidney and liver were affected (P < 0.03) by the Fe source. Compared with the FeSO4∙7H2O, feed grade or food grade NaFeEDTA up-regulated (P < 0.002) the heart CAT mRNA expression level. Chicks fed with the diet supplemented with feed grade NaFeEDTA had a higher (P = 0.0004) heart CAT mRNA expression level than those fed with the diet supplemented with Fe-Prot ES, and no differences (P > 0.05) were observed between FeSO4∙7H2O and Fe-Prot ES, Fe-Prot ES and food grade NaFeEDTA, as well as between feed grade and food grade NaFeEDTA. Compared to the FeSO4∙7H2O, the 3 organic Fe sources increased (P < 0.02) SDH mRNA expression levels in liver and kidney. No differences (P > 0.34) were observed in SDH mRNA expression levels in liver and kidney among the 3 organic Fe sources. In addition, mRNA expression levels of SDH in liver and kidney and liver COX were affected (P < 0.05) by added Fe level, but only SDH mRNA expression levels in kidney and liver increased linearly (P ≤ 0.0009); liver COX mRNA level did not increase linearly (P > 0.05) with increasing added Fe levels. No effects (P > 0.07) were found regarding the interaction between Fe source and added Fe level on all of the above indices as well as Fe source or added Fe level on other indices.

Table 8 Effects of dietary Fe on mRNA levels of tissue Fe-containing enzymes of broilers on d 21
Full size table

Protein expression levels

The data were shown in Fig. 1 and Table 9. Compared to the control, dietary Fe supplementation had no effect (P > 0.05) on protein expression levels of CAT and SDH in liver, but enhanced (P < 0.05) the COX protein expression level in liver. Meanwhile, Fe source, added Fe level, and their interaction did not affect (P > 0.14) protein expression levels of the above 3 Fe-containing enzymes in liver.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative Western blot images demonstrating the protein expression levels of SDH, CAT and COX in liver of broilers at 21 days of age. CAT = catalase; SDH = succinate dehydrogenase; COX = cytochrome c oxidase

Full size image
Table 9 Effects of dietary Fe on protein levels of liver Fe-containing enzymes of broilers on d 21
Full size table

Estimation of relative bioavailability values

Multiple linear regressions were conducted between the related dependent variables and daily dietary analyzed Fe intakes of different Fe sources during the experimental period (Table 10). Significant (P < 0.04) multiple linear regression relationships were observed in PI and TS in plasma, liver Fe content, SDH activities in liver, heart and kidney, CAT and COX activities in liver, and SDH mRNA expression levels in liver and kidney. Therefore, based on the above multiple linear regression equations in Table 10, the bioavailability values of 3 organic Fe sources relative to FeSO4∙7H2O were estimated (Table 11). Differences (P ≤ 0.03) in slopes among Fe sources were detected in PI, Fe content, and CAT activity in liver, SDH activities in heart and kidney, and SDH mRNA expression levels in liver and kidney. No differences (P ≥ 0.15) in slopes among Fe sources were detected in plasma TS, as well as SDH and COX activities in liver. When the response to reagent grade FeSO4∙7H2O was set to 100%, the relative bioavailabilities of feed grade Fe-Prot, feed grade NaFeEDTA, and food grade NaFeEDTA were 95% (P > 0.60), 106% (P > 0.43) and 120% (P < 0.02) (PI); 159% (P < 0.01), 179% (P < 0.0005), and 187% (P < 0.0002) (liver Fe content); 111% (P > 0.55), 133% (P > 0.09), and 144% (P < 0.03) (heart SDH activity); 138% (P > 0.12), 179% (P < 0.001), and 185% (P < 0.0007) (kidney SDH activity); 155% (P < 0.005), 156% (P < 0.004), and 194% (P < 0.0001) (liver CAT activity); 147% (P < 0.02), 160% (P < 0.002), and 169% (P < 0.0006) (liver SDH mRNA expression level); 170% (P < 0.003), 174% (P < 0.002), and 160% (P < 0.002) (kidney SDH mRNA expression level). The average relative bioavailabilities of Fe-Prot ES, feed grade NaFeEDTA, and food grade NaFeEDTA relative to FeSO4∙7H2O (100%) in broiler chicks were 139%, 155%, and 166%, respectively.

Table 10 Multiple linear regressions of dependent variables on daily dietary analyzed Fe intake1
Full size table
Table 11 Estimation of relative bioavailability values (RBV) of the 3 organic Fe sources1
Full size table

When the relative bioavailabilities were estimated based on PI, the slope was greater (P < 0.05) for food grade NaFeEDTA than for FeSO4∙7H2O or Fe-Prot ES; no differences (P > 0.05) were found between feed grade NaFeEDTA and each of the other 3 Fe sources as well as between FeSO4∙7H2O and Fe-Prot ES. When the relative bioavailabilities were estimated based on liver Fe content and SDH mRNA expression levels in liver and kidney, the slopes were greater (P < 0.05) for Fe-Prot ES, feed grade NaFeEDTA, and food grade NaFeEDTA than for FeSO4∙7H2O; no differences (P > 0.05) were found among the 3 organic Fe sources. When the relative bioavailabilities were estimated based on heart SDH activity, the slope was only greater (P < 0.05) for food grade NaFeEDTA than for FeSO4∙7H2O with no differences (P > 0.05) among other Fe sources. When the relative bioavailabilities were estimated based on kidney SDH activity, the slope was greater (P < 0.05) for feed grade or food grade NaFeEDTA than for FeSO4∙7H2O; no differences (P > 0.05) were observed between Fe-Prot ES and each of the other Fe sources as well as between feed grade NaFeEDTA and food grade NaFeEDTA. When the relative bioavailabilities were estimated based on liver CAT activity, the slopes were greater (P < 0.05) for Fe-Prot ES, feed grade, or food grade NaFeEDTA than for FeSO4∙7H2O; slopes were also greater (P < 0.05) for food grade NaFeEDTA than for Fe-Prot ES and no differences (P > 0.05) were observed between Fe-Prot ES and feed grade NaFeEDTA as well as between feed grade NaFeEDTA and food grade NaFeEDTA.

Discussion

In the present study, we found that the Qf values of both feed grade NaFeEDTA and food grade NaFeEDTA were as high as 2.07 × 108 and 3.31 × 108, respectively. These values were much higher than that (8,590) of the Fe-Prot ES used in the current and previous studies [12]. Such high values belong to super extremely strong chelation strengths according to the Qf value classification of Holwerda et al. for organic trace elements [31]. Furthermore, the average bioavailabilities of both feed grade NaFeEDTA and food grade NaFeEDTA relative to FeSO4·7H2O (100%) were 155% and 166%, respectively; however, the average bioavailability of Fe-Prot ES relative to FeSO4·7H2O (100%) was 139%, indicating that the NaFeEDTA sources with the greatest Qf values achieved the highest Fe bioavailabilities in broilers. The above findings have supported the proposed hypothesis, and have been not reported in broilers and all of other agricultural animals before. New insight and scientific basis were provided for the promotion and application of the highly bioavailable NaFeEDTA as a new feed Fe additive to minimize an excessive Fe addition to diets and manure Fe excretion to the environment in the poultry production.

The bioavailability of trace minerals refers to the proportion of the element ingested from a specific source that is absorbed, transported to its action site, and converted into physiologically active forms that can serve the animal metabolism [32]. Therefore, the selection of sensitive criteria is crucial for the evaluation of the bioavailability of trace elements [24]. Researchers have performed a series of experiments to estimate the bioavailabilities of different forms of organic Fe relative to the traditional inorganic Fe sulfate in animals, but the results were inconsistent [13, 33, 34]. These disparities in organic Fe bioavailabilities might depend upon a variety of different factors, especially the chemical characteristics of different Fe sources which are considered important for predicting the bioavailabilities of complexed or chelated metals [12]. Many studies from our laboratory have led to the valuable new finding, indicating that the complex or chelation strengths (Qf value) of organic Mn, Zn, Fe, or Cu sources are closely related to their bioavailabilities in both broilers and lactating cows [12,13,14, 24, 35,36,37,38,39,40]. Regarding organic Fe sources, the greater the Qf values, the greater their relative bioavailabilities in broilers [12, 13]. Therefore, the results of the present study further support and confirm our previous results. In addition, the Fe-Prot ES used in the present study was the same as that used in our previous study of Zhang et al. [12]. The bioavailabilities of the Fe-Prot ES relative to FeSO4∙7H2O (100%) as estimated based on the same indices (SDH mRNA expression levels in the liver and kidney of broilers on d 21) averaged 159% in the present study and 174% in our previous study [12], indicating that these results are repeatable and reliable.

Growth performance indices are generally unresponsive to the addition of many mineral elements to practical diets [24, 41]. The results of the present study are consistent with those of previous researches in broilers [12, 33, 42], indicating that the growth performance indicators are not suitable for the evaluation of bioavailabilities of Fe sources in broilers fed with a conventional practical diet.

Hematological indices have been proved to be the responsive criteria to determine Fe bioavailability [43,44,45,46]. For instance, when FeSO4∙7H2O was set to 100%, the relative Fe bioavailability of Fe glycinate was about 90% based on Hb concentration in rats [47]. Using a purified casein-dextrose basal diet containing 4.56 mg Fe/kg, Ma et al. [13], demonstrated that blood Hb concentration and total body Hb Fe were sensitive indices in reflecting differences in bioavailability among different Fe sources; the Fe proteinate with the moderate chelation strength (Qf = 43.6) was significantly more available (116%) to broilers than inorganic FeSO4∙7H2O (100%) in enhancing Hb concentration and total body Hb Fe. However, Zhang et al. [12], used a practical corn-soybean meal basal diet containing 55.8 mg Fe/kg, and found that the hematological indices (i.e., Hb, Hct, PI, TIBC, and TS) were not sufficiently sensitive indicators for evaluating the bioavailabilities of Fe sources, majorly due to the higher background Fe content in the practical corn-soybean meal basal diet. The results of the present study, where a similar practical corn-soybean meal basal diet containing 67.9 mg Fe/kg was employed, were partially consistent with the results of Zhang et al. regarding Hb, Hct, or TIBC; however, PI and TS were found to increase linearly with increasing added Fe levels in diets [12]. Furthermore, the bioavailability of food grade NaFeEDTA was estimated to be significantly higher than the bioavailability of FeSO4∙7H2O and Fe-Prot ES based on PI, indicating that PI could be a sensitive criterion for evaluating the bioavailabilities of Fe sources in broilers.

Tissue Fe accumulation has been considered a sensitive criterion for evaluating Fe bioavailability [48]. As liver is the main site of the body Fe storage and metabolism in the body, liver Fe content has been used as the evaluating criterion to compare the bioavailabilities of different Fe sources. It was reported that Fe contents in liver and kidney of broiler chicks fed with corn-soybean meal diets were increased linearly by added Fe level; further, the relative bioavailability of Fe methionine as estimated based on liver Fe content was 88.3% if FeSO4∙7H2O was set to 100% [49]. Yu et al. [50], demonstrated that the Fe-amino acid complex was more effective than FeSO4 in promoting liver Fe accumulation in weanling pigs. It is worth noting that in a recent study, compared with FeSO4, dietary supplementation with NaFeEDTA increased Fe contents in mouse liver, kidney, and blood, and decreased the bioavailability of the heavy metal lead (Pb) [51]. In the current study, Fe contents in liver and heart were affected by Fe source, but only liver Fe content exhibited a significantly linear increase as dietary added Fe levels increased, indicating that the liver Fe content could be a sensitive criterion for estimating the bioavailabilities of Fe sources in broilers.

The Fe is an indispensable cofactor of many enzymes, such as CAT, SDH, and COX, and the activities of these Fe-containing enzymes play a crucial role in maintaining animal physiological homeostasis [52]. CAT is an antioxidant enzyme that prevents cells from the oxidative damage by degrading hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen [53]. The SDH and COX are two respiratory enzymes, localized in the mitochondrial membrane, and they are essential for mitochondrial function [54]. It has been widely accepted that Fe source and Fe level can affect the activities of Fe-containing enzymes [55, 56]. Liver, heart, and kidney are specific target tissues that are particularly rich in these Fe-containing enzymes. Ma et al. [57], reported that the activities of SDH, CAT, and COX in the liver, and the activity of SDH in the heart of broilers fed with a corn-soybean meal basal diet supplemented with FeSO4∙7H2O increased quadratically with increasing dietary added Fe levels. Feng et al. [58], reported that liver SDH activity in weaned piglets increased linearly with increasing dietary Fe levels. However, Zhang et al. [12], found that CAT activities in the above 3 tissues, as well as SDH activity in heart of broilers at 21 days of age were not affected by Fe source and added Fe level. In the present study, CAT activity in liver and SDH activity in kidney of broilers at 21 days of age were affected by Fe source, and increased linearly with increasing supplemental Fe levels. Meanwhile, heart SDH activity also increased linearly with increasing added Fe levels, and there was a significant difference in Fe bioavailability between FeSO4∙7H2O and food grade NaFeEDTA. These results imply that the above 3 indices could be specifically sensitive functional criteria for estimating the bioavailabilities of Fe sources in broilers. The above inconsistency between the present study and previous studies might be related to the differences in Fe source, added Fe level, and broiler sources.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the mRNA expression levels of key enzymes or functional proteins in target tissues of animals are highly sensitive to the changes in dietary trace element contents [24, 41, 54]. For instance, SDH mRNA expression levels in liver and kidney of broilers on d 21 increased linearly with increasing added Fe levels; these were sensitive criteria for estimating the relative bioavailabilities of organic Fe sources with different chelation strengths [12]. Herein, mRNA expression levels of Fe-containing enzymes (SDH, CAT, and COX) in various tissues (heart, kidney and liver) of broiler chicks at 21 days of age were also determined; the results showed that only SDH mRNA expression levels in liver and kidney were influenced by both Fe source and added Fe level, as well as increased linearly with increasing dietary added Fe levels. Thus, these are particularly sensitive functional indices for evaluating the bioavailabilities of Fe sources in broilers, which is completely consistent with the results of Zhang et al. [12] from our laboratory. In addition, protein expression levels of SDH, CAT, and COX in the liver of broilers on d 21 were also assessed. The results showed that these indices were not affected by either Fe source or added Fe level, indicating that protein expression levels of the above Fe-containing enzymes in liver were not sensitive indices for assessing the bioavailabilities of Fe sources for broilers. As no specific antibodies for detecting protein expressions of the above Fe-containing enzymes in chicks are available now, other nonspecific antibodies (such as anti-rabbit antibody and anti-mouse antibody) had to be used to assess the above protein expressions. Furthermore, because protein expressions are affected by more complicated factors, and are usually delayed for a certain time after the corresponding mRNA expressions, it would be reasonable to assume that the mRNA expression levels of SDH in tissues are more sensitive than the protein expression levels detected in the present study.

As mentioned above, the bioavailabilities of organic trace elements in animals are largely determined by their complex or chelation strengths (Qf values). Previous studies in our laboratory using broilers as model animals have indicated that the organic Mn or Zn sources with moderate complex or chelation strengths (Qf values = 10–100) displayed the highest relative bioavailabilities [24, 35, 37]. Further, the organic Mn, Zn, or Cu sources with weak complex strengths (Qf values < 10) were comparable to their inorganic forms [24, 35, 37], while the bioavailability of the organic Zn with near extremely strong chelation strength (Qf value = 944) was significantly lower than that of the inorganic ZnSO4 [24, 35, 37]. However, regarding organic Fe sources, the obtained results were inconsistent with the above conclusions. The results of the present study and our previous research in broilers consistently demonstrated that the greater the Qf values of organic Fe sources, the higher their bioavailabilities relative to FeSO4∙7H2O [12]; the NaFeEDTA sources with the greatest Qf values displayed the highest Fe bioavailabilities. The reasons for the above discrepancies might be related to the different chemical characteristic and absorptive mechanism of Fe in the small intestine. Compared to other essential trace elements such as Mn, Zn, and Cu, Fe is relatively active and more easily affected by complex factors (such as pH, Ca, phytate, and fibers) in the gastrointestinal tract. To improve Fe absorption and utilization, it is therefore necessary to use the strongest ligand such as EDTA to protect Fe against the interferences from these factors in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, the organic NaFeEDTA sources with the strongest chelation strengths could better resist to the above complex interferences. More Fe in the form of NaFeEDTA arrived at the absorptive site on the brush edge surface of the small intestine, where it might be dissociated and absorbed in the form of the ionized Fe for target tissue utilization; thus, the NaFeEDTA sources were more available to broilers. However, as more Zn from the organic Zn with near extremely strong chelation strength arrived at the absorptive site, the binding strength of this chelated Zn might be stronger than the binding strength of Zn transporters, leading to a lesser Zn bioavailability. Additionally, even if this chelated Zn could be absorbed in the form of the intact chelated molecular Zn, such absorbed Zn might be not better released from the intact chelated molecule for the target tissue utilization because of its strong chelation strength, and thus, it would be less available to broilers. Further research is required to identify the Fe absorption mechanisms when provided in the form of NaFeEDTA in the small intestine of broilers as well as its metabolic utilization and mechanisms in the target tissue of broilers to confirm the above speculations.

Conclusion

The present study showed that PI, liver Fe content, SDH activities in kidney and heart, liver CAT activity, and SDH mRNA expression levels in liver and kidney of 21-day-old broilers were sensitive indices to evaluate the bioavailabilities of Fe sources in broilers chicks fed with a corn-soybean meal diet during 1–21 days of age. The bioavailabilities of organic Fe sources relative to FeSO4∙7H2O (100%) were closely related to their Qf values, and the NaFeEDTA sources with the greatest Qf values (2.07 × 108–3.31 × 108) displayed the highest Fe bioavailabilities (155%–166%).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AA:

Arbor Acres

ADFI:

Average daily feed intake

ADG:

Average daily gain

BCA:

Bicinchoninic acid

Ca:

Calcium

Ca(CH3COO)2·H2O:

Calcium acetate monohydrate

CAT:

Catalase

COX:

Cytochrome c oxidase

E1/2 :

Half-wave potential

Fe:

Iron

Fe-Prot ES:

Iron proteinate with an extremely strong chelation strength

FeSO4·7H2O:

Ferrous sulfate

F/G:

Feed to gain ratio

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

Hb:

Hemoglobin

Hct:

Hematocrit

NaFeEDTA:

Sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate

Na2S2O3 :

Sodium thiosulfate

PI:

Plasma iron

Qf :

Quotient of formation

RT-qPCR:

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

SDH:

Succinate dehydrogenase

TIBC:

Total iron binding capacity

TS:

Transferrin saturation

References

  1. Mayneris-Perxachs J, Moreno-Navarrete JM, Fernandez-Real JM. The role of iron in host-microbiota crosstalk and its effects on systemic glucose metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022;18(11):683–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abboud S, Haile DJ. A novel mammalian iron-regulated protein involved in intracellular iron metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(26):19906–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Conrad ME, Umbreit JN. Iron absorption and transport-an update. Am J Hematol. 2000;64(4):287–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hallberg L. Bioavailability of dietary iron in man. Annu Rev Nutr. 1981;1:123–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson GJ, Frazer DM, McKie AT, Wilkins SJ, Vulpe CD. The expression and regulation of the iron transport molecules hephaestin and IREG1: implications for the control of iron export from the small intestine. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2002;36(2–3):137–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tako E, Rutzke MA, Glahn RP. Using the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) as an in vivo model for iron bioavailability. Poult Sci. 2010;89(3):514–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jordan I, Kaplan J. The mammalian transferrin-independent iron transport system may involve a surface ferrireductase activity. Biochem J. 1994;302(Pt 3):875–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins JF, Franck CA, Kowdley KV, Ghishan FK. Identification of differentially expressed genes in response to dietary iron deprivation in rat duodenum. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;288(5):964–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bai SP, Cao SM, Ma XL, Li XF, Liao XD, Zhang LY, et al. Organic iron absorption and expression of related transporters in the small intestine of broilers. Poult Sci. 2021;100(8):101182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang LY, Li XF, Liao XD, Zhang LY, Lu L, Luo XG. Effect of iron source on iron absorption and gene expression of iron transporters in the ligated duodenal loops of broilers. J Anim Sci. 2017;95(4):1587–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhuo Z, Fang SL, Yue M, Zhang YW, Feng J. Kinetics absorption characteristics of ferrous glycinate in SD rats and its impact on the relevant transport protein. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2014;158(2):197–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang LY, Lu L, Zhang LY, Luo XG. The chemical characteristics of organic iron sources and their relative bioavailabilities for broilers fed a conventional corn-soybean meal diet. J Anim Sci. 2016;94(6):2378–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma XY, Liu SB, Lu L, Li SF, Xie JJ, Zhang LY, et al. Relative bioavailability of iron proteinate for broilers fed a casein-dextrose diet. Poult Sci. 2014;93(3):556–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang FN, Lu L, Li SF, Liu SB, Zhang LY, Yao JH, et al. Relative bioavailability of manganese proteinate for broilers fed a conventional corn-soybean meal diet. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012;146(2):181–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu L, Zhang LY, Li XF, Liao XD, Zhang LY, Luo XG. Organic iron absorption by in situ ligated jejunal and ileal loops of broilers. J Anim Sci. 2018;96(12):5198–208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu L, Dong XY, Ma XL, Zhang LY, Li SF, Luo XG, et al. Metabolic utilization of intravenously injected iron from different iron sources in target tissues of broiler chickens. Anim Nutr. 2022;9:74–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu L, Glahn RP, Yeung CK, Miller DD. Iron uptake by Caco-2 cells from NaFeEDTA and FeSO4: effects of ascorbic acid, pH, and a Fe(II) chelating agent. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54(20):7924–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bothwell TH, MacPhail AP. The potential role of NaFeEDTA as an iron fortificant. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2004;74(6):421–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Umbelino DC, Cardello HM, Rossi EA. Effect of iron salts addition on the sensory characteristics of soy yogurt. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2001;51(2):199–203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. GB 22557–2008 Food additive sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Beijing: Standars Press of China; 2008.

  21. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. GB/T 6435–2014 Determination of moisture in feed. Beijing: Standars Press of China; 2014.

  22. China Food and Drug Administration. GB 5009.268–2016 Determination of multiple elements in food. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2016.

  23. Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China. NY/T 33–2004 Feeding standard of chicken. Beijing: Agricultural Press of China; 2004.

  24. Huang YL, Lu L, Li SF, Luo XG, Liu B. Relative bioavailabilities of organic zinc sources with different chelation strengths for broilers fed a conventional corn-soybean meal diet. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(6):2038–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liao XD, Ma CY, Lu L, Zhang LY, Luo XD. Determination of dietary iron requirements by full expression of iron-containing cytochrome c oxidase in the heart of broilers from 22 to 42 d of age. Br J Nutr. 2017;118(7):493–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Li SF, Lu L, Hao SF, Wang YP, Zhang LY, Liu SB, et al. Dietary manganese modulates expression of the manganese-containing superoxide dismutase gene in chickens. J Nutr. 2011;141(2):189–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Littell RC, Henry PR, Lewis AJ, Ammerman CB. Estimation of relative bioavailability of nutrients using SAS procedures. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(10):2672–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Littell R, Lewis A, Henry P. Statistical evaluation of bioavailability assays. In: Ammerman CB, editor. Bioavailability of nutrients for animals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1995. p. p5–35.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu BX, Zhang WY, Zhu L, Li D, Gao FY, Wu W, et al. Effects of sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate on growth performance and deposition of other trace elements in tissues of broilers. China Poultry. 2023.

  31. Holwerda RA, Albin RC, Madsen FC. Chelation effectiveness of zinc proteinates demonstrated. Feedstuffs. 1995;67:12–3.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang SM, Liao XD, Ma XY, Zhang LY, Lu L, Luo XG. Relative bioavailability of ultrafine sodium selenite for broilers fed a conventional corn-soybean meal diet. J Anim Sci. 2018;96(11):4755–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwiecien M, Samolinska W, Bujanowicz-Haras B. Effects of iron-glycine chelate on growth, carcass characteristic, liver mineral concentrations and haematological and biochemical blood parameters in broilers. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2015;99(6):1184–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kajarabille N, Brown C, Cucliciu A, Thapaliya G, Latunde-Dada GO. Bioavailability of iron multi-amino acid chelate preparation in mice and human duodenal HuTu 80 cells. Br J Nutr. 2017;117(6):767–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li S, Luo X, Liu B, Crenshaw TD, Kuang X, Shao G, et al. Use of chemical characteristics to predict the relative bioavailability of supplemental organic manganese sources for broilers. J Anim Sci. 2004;82(8):2352–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Li S, Luo XG, Lu L, Crenshaw TD, Bu YQ, Liu B, et al. Bioavailability of organic manganese sources in broilers fed high dietary calcium. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2005;123-124(12):703–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu SB, Lu L, Li SF, Xie JJ, Zhang LY, Wang RL, et al. Copper in organic proteinate or inorganic sulfate form is equally bioavailable for broiler chicks fed a conventional corn-soybean meal diet. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012;147(1–3):142–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang YL, Lu L, Li SF, Li XL, Zhang LY, Xi L, et al. Relative bioavailabilities of organic zinc sources with different chelation strengths for broilers fed diets with low or high phytate content. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;179:144–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang RL, Liang JG, Lu L, Zhang LY, Li SF, Luo XG. Effect of zinc source on performance, zinc status, immune response, and rumen fermentation of lactating cows. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013;152(1):16–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Suo HQ, Lu L, Zhang LY, Zhang XY, Li H, Lu YF, et al. Relative bioavailability of zinc-methionine chelate for broilers fed a conventional corn-soybean meal diet. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2015;165(2):206–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Luo XG, Li SF, Lu L, Liu B, Kuang X, Shao GZ, et al. Gene expression of manganese-containing superoxide dismutase as a biomarker of manganese bioavailability for manganese sources in broilers. Poult Sci. 2007;86(5):888–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shinde PL, Ingale SL, Choi JY, Kim JS, Pak SI, Chae BJ. Efficiency of inorganic and organic iron sources under iron depleted conditions in broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2011;52(5):578–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ologunde MO, Morris JB, Shepard RL, Afolabi AO, Oke OL. Bioavailability to rats of iron from fortified grain amaranth. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1994;45(3):191–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ettle T, Schlegel P, Roth FX. Investigations on iron bioavailability of different sources and supply levels in piglets. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2008;92(1):35–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Amine EK, Neff R, Hegsted DM. Biological estimation of available iron using chicks or rats. J Agric Food Chem. 1972;20(2):246–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim M, Atallah MT. Structure of dietary pectin, iron bioavailability and hemoglobin repletion in anemic rats. J Nutr. 1992;122(11):2298–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Galdi M, Bassi A, Rendo M, Valencia ME. Ferric glycinate iron bioavailability determined by hemoglobin regeneration method. Nutr Rep Int. 1988;37(3):591–8.

  48. Pirman T, Oresnik A. Fe bioavailability from Fe-enriched yeast biomass in growing rats. Animal. 2012;6(2):221–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cao J, Luo XG, Henry PR, Ammerman CB, Littell RC, Miles RD. Effect of dietary iron concentration, age, and length of iron feeding on feed intake and tissue iron concentration of broiler chicks for use as a bioassay of supplemental iron sources. Poult Sci. 1996;75(4):495–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Yu B, Huang W, Chiou P. Bioavailability of iron from amino acid complex in weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2000;86:39–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lin XY, Xue RY, Zhou L, Zhang YS, Wang HY, Zhang S, et al. Effects of various Fe compounds on the bioavailability of Pb contained in orally ingested soils in mice. Mechanistic insights and health implications. Environ Int. 2022;170:107664.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Pondarre C, Antiochos BB, Campagna DR, Clarke SL, Greer EL, Deck KM, et al. The mitochondrial ATP-binding cassette transporter Abcb7 is essential in mice and participates in cytosolic iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(6):953–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Alfonso-Prieto M, Biarnes X, Vidossich P, Rovira C. The molecular mechanism of the catalase reaction. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(33):11751–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rapizzi E, Ercolino T, Canu L, Giache V, Francalanci M, Pratesi C, et al. Mitochondrial function and content in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma of succinate dehydrogenase mutation carriers. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2012;19(3):261–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ribeiro TP, Fernandes C, Melo KV, Ferreira SS, Lessa JA, Franco RW, et al. Iron, copper, and manganese complexes with in vitro superoxide dismutase and/or catalase activities that keep Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells alive under severe oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;80:67–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Tavsan Z, Ayar KH. The effect of iron and copper as an essential nutrient on mitochondrial electron transport system and lipid peroxidation in Trichoderma harzianum. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;170(7):1665–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ma XY, Liao XD, Lu L, Li SF, Zhang LY, Luo XG. Determination of dietary Iron requirements by full expression of Iron-containing enzymes in various tissues of broilers. J Nutr. 2016;146(11):2267–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Feng J, Ma W, Xu Z, He J, Wang Y, Liu J. The effect of iron glycine chelate on tissue mineral levels, fecal mineral concentration, and liver antioxidant enzyme activity in weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2009;150:106–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Jiangsu Shuang Chuang Tuan Dui program (JSSCTD202147), Jiangsu Shuang Chuang Ren Cai program (JSSCRC2021541), Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2022QNRC001), and the Initiation Funds of Yangzhou University for Distinguished Scientists.

Funding

This work was funded by Jiangsu Shuang Chuang Tuan Dui program (JSSCTD202147), Jiangsu Shuang Chuang Ren Cai program (JSSCRC2021541), Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2022QNRC001), and the Initiation Funds of Yangzhou University for Distinguished Scientists.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Shengchen Wang and Bingxin Wu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225000, People’s Republic of China

    Shengchen Wang, Bingxin Wu, Ling Zhu, Weiyun Zhang, We Wu, Jiaqi Wu, Yun Hu, Tingting Li, Xiaoyan Cui & Xugang Luo

  2. Mineral Nutrition Research Division, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China

    Liyang Zhang

Authors
  1. Shengchen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bingxin Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ling Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weiyun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liyang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. We Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jiaqi Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tingting Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaoyan Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xugang Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

We thank all authors for their contribution to the present study. SCW and XGL wrote the manuscript. SCW, BXW, LZ, WYZ, LYZ, WW, JQW, YH, TTL, and XYC conducted all experiments. BXW analyzed the data. XGL had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xugang Luo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Yangzhou University Animal Experiments Ethics Committee (permit number: SYXK (Su) IACUC 2012–0029). Each experimental method was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Experimental Animal Affairs Administration approved by the State Council, PRC.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Wu, B., Zhu, L. et al. The chemical characteristics of different sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate sources and their relative bioavailabilities for broilers fed with a conventional corn-soybean meal diet. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 15, 16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00969-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00969-3

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891