Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:04:31.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

A critique of motivation constructs to explain higher-order behavior: We should unpack the black box

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2024

Kou Murayama
Affiliation:
Hector Research Institute, University of Tübingen, Europastraße 6, 72072 Tübingen, Germany k.murayama@uni-tuebingen.de; https://motivationsciencelab.com/ Kochi University of Technology, 185 Miyanokuchi, Tosayamada, Kami-shi, Kochi, 782-8502, Japan hayleyjach@gmail.com
Hayley Jach
Affiliation:
Hector Research Institute, University of Tübingen, Europastraße 6, 72072 Tübingen, Germany k.murayama@uni-tuebingen.de; https://motivationsciencelab.com/

Abstract

The constructs of motivation (or needs, motives, etc.) to explain higher-order behavior have burgeoned in psychology. In this article, we critically evaluate such high-level motivation constructs that many researchers define as causal determinants of behavior. We identify a fundamental issue with this predominant view of motivation, which we called the black-box problem. Specifically, high-level motivation constructs have been considered as causally instigating a wide range of higher-order behavior, but this does not explain what they actually are or how behavioral tendencies are generated. The black box problem inevitably makes the construct ill-defined and jeopardizes its theoretical status. To address the problem, we discuss the importance of mental computational processes underlying motivated behavior. Critically, from this perspective, motivation is not a unitary construct that causes a wide range of higher-order behavior --- it is an emergent property that people construe through the regularities of subjective experiences and behavior. The proposed perspective opens new avenues for future theoretical development, i.e., the examination of how motivated behavior is realized through mental computational processes.

Type
Target Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)