Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:27:42.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The evolution of (intergroup) peace hinges on how we define groups and peace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2024

Anne C. Pisor Open the ORCID record for Anne C. Pisor [Opens in a new window] ,
Kristopher M. Smith Open the ORCID record for Kristopher M. Smith [Opens in a new window]  and
Jeffrey P. Deminchuk
Anne C. Pisor*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA anne.pisor@wsu.edu kristopher.m.smith@wsu.edu https://www.kristophermsmith.com/ Department of Human Behavior, Ecology, and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
Kristopher M. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA anne.pisor@wsu.edu kristopher.m.smith@wsu.edu https://www.kristophermsmith.com/
Jeffrey P. Deminchuk
Affiliation:
School of Politics, Philosophy, and Public Affairs, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA jeffrey.deminchuk@wsu.edu https://socialitylab.org
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glowacki defines peace as harmonious relationships between groups maintained without the threat of violence, where groups can be anything from families to nation states. However, defining such contentious concepts like “peace” and “groups” is a difficult task, and we discuss the implications of Glowacki's definitions for understanding intergroup relationships and their evolutionary history.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e22
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chapais, B. (2008). Primeval kinship: How pair-bonding gave birth to human society. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (1996). Explaining interethnic cooperation. American Political Science Review, 90(4), 715–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glowacki, L. (2023b). Myths about the evolution of war: Apes, foragers, and the stories we tell. EcoEvoRxiv. https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/5201/Google Scholar
Helbling, J. (2006). War and peace in societies without central power: Theories and perspectives. In Otto, T., Thrane, H., & Vandkilde, H. (Eds.), Warfare and society: Archaeological and social anthropological perspectives (pp. 113–139). Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Kramer, K. L. (2023). Female cooperation: Evolutionary, cross-cultural and ethnographic evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1868), 20210425. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moya, C. (2022). What does it mean for humans to be groupish? Philosophy Compass, 18(2), e12893. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pietraszewski, D. (2022). Toward a computational theory of social groups: A finite set of cognitive primitives for representing any and all social groups in the context of conflict. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, e97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21000583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisor, A. C., & Ross, C. T. (2022). Distinguishing intergroup and long-distance relationships. Human Nature, 33, 280–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-022-09431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pisor, A. C., & Ross, C. T. (2023). Parochial altruism: What it is and why it varies Evolution and Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisor, A. C., & Surbeck, M. (2019). The evolution of intergroup tolerance in nonhuman primates and humans. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 28(4), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21793CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodseth, L., & Wrangham, R. (2004). Human kinship: A continuation of politics by other means? In Chapais, B. & Berman, C. M. (Eds.), Kinship and behavior in primates (pp. 389–419). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar