Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

On the origins of the conflict between Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins

Why was the relationship between Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins so fraught? A great deal has been written on the contributions of Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins to determining the double helix structure of DNA. I attempt here to shed some light not on this issue but on their relationship, with the help of university and college records.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737–738 (1953).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilkins, M. H. F., Stokes, A. R. & Wilson, H. R. Molecular structure of deoxypentose nucleic acids. Nature 171, 738–740 (1953).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Franklin, R. E. & Gosling, R. G. Molecular configuration in sodium thymonucleate. Nature 171, 740–741 (1953).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olby, R. The Path to the Double Helix (Macmillan Press, 1974).

  5. Watson, J. D. The Double Helix (Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1976).

  6. Maddox, B. Rosalind Franklin: the Dark Lady of DNA (HarperCollins, 2003).

  7. Wilkins, M. H. F. The Third Man of the Double Helix (Oxford University Press, 2004).

  8. Sayre, A. Rosalind Franklin and DNA (WW Norton, 1975).

  9. Cobb, M. & Comfort, N. What Rosalind Franklin truly contributed to the discovery of DNA’s structure. Nature 616, 657–660 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, G. Unravelling the Double Helix (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2019).

  11. Franklin, R. E. & Gosling, R. G. The structure of sodium thymonucleate fibres. II. The cylindrically symmetrical Patterson function. Acta Crystallogr. 6, 678–685 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Franklin, R. E. & Gosling, R. G. Evidence for 2-chain helix in crystalline structure of sodium deoxyribonucleate. Nature 172, 156–157 (1953).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Franklin, R. E. & Gosling, R. G. The structure of sodium thymonucleate fibres. I. The influence of water content. Acta Crystallogr. 6, 673–677 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the archivists at the University of London and King’s College London, who have provided him with much useful information, and to the University of London for granting him access to the 1950–53 minutes of the ICI/T&N Fellowship Committee. He is also grateful to C. Cardin, W. Fuller, A. Neidle, D. Neidle and Z. Waller for much helpful comment and advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Neidle.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Related links

Letter from J. T. Randall to Rosalind Franklin: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/jpn5yce2/items?canvas=3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neidle, S. On the origins of the conflict between Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. Nat Rev Chem 7, 747–748 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-023-00551-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-023-00551-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing