Abstract
The present study aims to explore the factors that influence the utilization of intercity transportation services, with a specific focus on ridesharing and bus services, assessing the dimensions of reliability, comfort, responsiveness, safety, social interaction, driver empathy, and value. To this end, it uses responses from 110 users of ridesharing, and 200 users of conventional intercity bus services. Using a non-linear method, Penalty-reward Contrast Analysis, the results show that the investigated dimensions have a distinct influence on the propensity to continue using each of these services, explaining 32% of using conventional road transport, and 65% of ridesharing. We confirmed the non-linearity between customer perception of the surveyed dimensions' performance and their propensity to use the service, with differences and similarities between bus and ridesharing services. A low performance of the dimensions of safety and comfort, and a high performance of reliability, impact both services. But there are significant differences in the impact of perceived value, responsiveness, driver empathy, and social interaction. These findings allow service providers to better understand customers' needs and provide better service.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acheampong, R.A., Siiba, A.: Modelling the determinants of car-sharing adoption intentions among young adults: the role of attitude, perceived benefits, travel expectations and socio-demographic factors. Transportation 47, 2557–2580 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10029-3
Albayrak, T., Caber, M.: Penalty–reward-contrast analysis: a review of its application in customer satisfaction research. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 24, 1288–1300 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.776757
Anaya-Sánchez, R., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Nasiff-Seiffert, M. and Molinillo, S.: Why Rideshare?: An Analysis of Factors Influencing Intention to Use. In: Sharing Economy and the Impact of Collaborative Consumption (pp. 185–203). IGI Global (2020). https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/why-rideshare/235844
Andersson, M., Hjalmarsson, A., Avital, M.: Peer-to-Peer Service Sharing Platforms: Driving Share and Share Alike on a Mass-Scale. In: International Conference of Information Systems 2013, Milan, Italy. Association for Information Systems (2013)
ANTT - Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres: Resolução Nº 4.130, de 3 de Julho de 2013. https://portal.antt.gov.br/legislacao-do-transporte-rodoviario-interestadual-de-passageiros. (2013) Accessed on Dec/ 25th, 2020
Arteaga-Sánchez, R., Belda-Ruiz, M., Ros-Galvez, A., Rosa-Garcia, A.: Why continue sharing: determinants of behavior in ridesharing services. Int. J. Mark. Res. 62(6), 725–742 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318805300
Babbie, E. R..: The practice of social research. 12 ed., Belmont, CA: Wads worth Cengage. 625 p. (2010)
Barabino, B., Deiana, E., Tilocca, P.: Measuring service quality in urban bus transport: a modified SERVQUAL approach. Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci. 4(3), 238–252 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691211269567
Barabino, B., Cabras, N.A., Conversano, C., Olivo, A.: An integrated approach to select key quality indicators in transit services. Soc. Indic. Res. 149, 1045–1080 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02284-0
Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G.M.: Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. J. Consumer Res. 39(4), 881–898 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1086/666376
Bartikowski, B., Llosa, S.: Customer satisfaction measurement: comparing four methods of attribute categorizations. Serv. Ind. J. 24(4), 67–82 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0264206042000275190
Bebko, C.P.: Service intangibility and its impact on consumer expectations of service quality. J. Serv. Mark. 14(1), 9–26 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040010309185
Belk, R.: You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. J. Bus. Res. 67(8), 1595–1600 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001
Bergamo, F.: Uber x Táxi: Analisando a Qualidade via SERVQUAL. (2015). Available at https://marketingemfoco.com/2015/11/30/uber-x-taxi/
BlaBlaCar (2023), Extracted on Mar.,15th,2023. https://www.BlaBlaCar.com.br/about-us
Brasil, 1998. Presidential Decree No. 2521 of March 20, 1998. Regulation of the Interstate and International Road Transport Service for Passengers. (in Portuguese). https://legislacao.presidencia.gov.br/atos/?tipo=DEC&numero=2521&ano=1998&ato=eb0QTWq10dNpWT405
Butterfield, L.D., Borgen, W.A., Amundson, N.E., Maglio, A.S.T.: Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954–2004 and beyond. Qual. Res. 5(4), 475–497 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056924
CEN/TC 320 (2002) Transportation – Logistics and services. European Standard EN 13816: Public passenger transport – Service quality definition, targeting and measurement. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels. Technical Report
Chang, Y. H., Yeh, C. H.: Corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty in intercity bus services. Transp. Policy 59, 38–45 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.07.001
Chen, H.K.: Structural interrelationships of group service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention for bus passengers. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 10(5), 418–429 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2014.965372
Cheng, M.: Sharing economy: a review and agenda for future research. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 57, 60–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.06.003
Cheng, X., Fu, S., de Vreede, G.J.: A mixed method investigation of sharing economy driven car-hailing services: online and offline perspectives. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 41, 57–64 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.03.005
Cheng, X., Zhu, R., Fu, S.: Modeling the Motivation of Users’ Sharing Option: A Case Study Based on A Car-Sharing Digital Platform. In WHICEB, 64 (2016). https://aisel.aisnet.org/whiceb2016/64/
Cheng, X., Su, L., Yang, B.: An investigation into sharing economy enabled ridesharing drivers’ trust: a qualitative study. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100956
Cohen, B., Kietzmann, J.: Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 279–296 (2014). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2519349
Cronin, J.J., Jr., Brady, M.K., Hult, G.T.M.: Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. J. Retail. 76(2), 193–218 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2
Da Silva Nascimento, L., de Lima, L.F.S., Melo, F.V.S.: Collaborative consumption: a quantitative research in light of the conscious consumption of car sharing users. J. Mark. Manag. 6(1), 41–54 (2018)
Dall Pizzol, H., Ordovás de Almeida, S., do Soares, C.M.: Collaborative consumption: a proposed scale for measuring the construct applied to a carsharing setting. Sustainability 9(5), 703 (2017)
de Oña, R., Machado, J.L., de Oña, J.: Perceived service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: structural equation model for the Metro of Seville. Spain. Transp. Res. Record 2538(1), 76–85 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3141/2538-09
Delhomme, P., Gheorghiu, A.: Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: which factors contribute the most to carpooling? Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 42, 1–15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.014
Dowling, R., Kent, J.: Practice and public–private partnerships in sustainable transport governance: the case of carsharing in Sydney. Australia. Transport Policy 40, 58–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.02.007
Edmondson, A.C., Kramer, R.M., Cook, K.S.: Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. Trust Distrust Organ. Dilemmas Approach. 12, 239–272 (2004)
Fellesson, M., Friman, M.: Perceived satisfaction with public transport services in nine European cities. J. Transp. Res. Forum 47(3), 93–103 (2008)
Finger M., Bert N., Kupfer D., Montero J., Wolek M.: Infrastructure funding challenges in the sharing economy. European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels (2017)
Fiske A. P., Haslam, N.: The four basic social bonds: Structures for coordinating interaction. In: M. M. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp. 267–298). New York, London: Guilford Press (2005)
Flanagan, J.C.: The critical incident technique. Psychol. Bull. 51(4), 327–358 (1954)
Fraiberger, S. P., Sundararajan, A.: Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy. NYU Stern School of Business research paper, 6 (2015). https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:net:wpaper:1519
Freitas, A.L.P.: Assessing the quality of intercity road transportation of passengers: an exploratory study in Brazil. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 49, 379–392 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.042
Frenken, K., Schor, J.: Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 100(23), 3–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117814.00017
Ganji, S.S., Ahangar, A.N., Awasthi, A., Bandari, S.J.: Psychological analysis of intercity bus passenger satisfaction using Q methodology. Transp. Res. Part a: Policy Pract. 154, 345–363 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.023
Gao, S., Jing, J., Guo, H.: The role of trust with car-sharing services in the sharing economy in China: From the consumers’ perspective. In: International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design (pp. 634–646). Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57931-3_51
González, M.E.A., Comesaña, L.R., Brea, J.A.F.: Assessing tourist behavioral intentions through perceived service quality and customer satisfaction. J. Bus. Res. 60(2), 153–160 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.014
Govender, J.P., Pan, Q.: Enhancement of service quality in the intercity bus transport industry. Alternation. 4, 181–202 (2011)
Grönroos, C.: A service quality model and its marketing implication. Eur. J. Mark. 18(4), 36–44 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004784
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1998)
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A.: The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 67(9), 2047–2059 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552
Herzberg, F.M., Mausner, B., Snyderman, B.: The motivation to work. John Willey, New York (1959)
Horsu, E.N., Yeboah, S.T.: Influence of service quality on customer satisfaction: a study of minicab taxi services in cape coast, ghana. Int. J. Econ. Commer. Manag. 3(5), 1451–1464 (2015)
Hu, X., Zhao, L., Wang, W.: Impact of perceptions of bus service performance on mode choice preference. Adv. Mech. Eng. 7(3), 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015573826
Hu, K.C., Jen, W.: Passengers’ behavioral Intentions for intercity bus service in taiwan: application and comparison of the lisrel and neural networks. J. Eastern Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 7, 486–498 (2007). https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.7.486
Huwer, U.: Public transport and car-sharing benefits and effects of combined services. Transp. Policy 11(1), 77–87 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.08.002
Hwang, J., Griffiths, M.A.: Share more, drive less: Millennials value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption services. J. Consum. Mark. 34(2), 132–146 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2015-1560
Ismaila, A.A., Safrib, S.N., Anuarc, N.A.M., Mohid, Z.: The quality of e-ridesharing: are the e-ridesharing passengers satisfied? Int. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 5(1), 1–25 (2023). https://doi.org/10.35313/ijabr.v5i01.310
Johnston, R.: The determinants of service quality: Satisfiers and dissatisfiers. J. Serv. Manag. 6(5), 53–71 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239510101536
Julagasigorn, P., Banomyong, R., Grant, D. B., Varadejsatitwong, P.: What encourages people to carpool? A conceptual framework of carpooling psychological factors and research propositions. Transp. Res. Int. Persp. 12, 100493 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100493
Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu J. Jpn. Soc. Quality Control 14(2), 39–48 (1984)
Kim, J., Rasouli, S., Timmermans, H.: Satisfaction and uncertainty in car-sharing decisions: an integration of hybrid choice and random regret-based models. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 95, 13–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.005
Kim, J., Yoon, Y., Zo, H.: Why people participate in the sharing economy: A social exchange perspective. In: 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2015. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (2015)
Kittelson & Assoc, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., KFH Group, Inc., Texam A&M Transportation Institute, & Arup. (2013). Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Third Edition. Transit Cooperative Highway Research Program (TCRP) Report 165, published by Transportation Research Board, Washington, 629
Ko, G., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Appiah, G., Larimo, J.: Non-market strategies and building digital trust in sharing economy platforms. J. Int. Manag. 28(1), 100909 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100909
Koopman, C., Mitchell, M., Thierer, A.: The sharing economy and consumer protection regulation: the case for policy change. J. Bus. Entrep. Law 8(2), 529 (2014)
Kumar, A., Gupta, A., Parida, M., Chauhan, V.: Service quality assessment of ride-sourcing services: a distinction between ride-hailing and ride-sharing services. Transp. Policy 127, 61–79 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.08.013
Lamberton, C.P., Rose, R.L.: When is ours better than mine? a framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. J. Mark. 76(4), 109–125 (2012)
Lasmar Júnior, E.L., Gandia, S.M, De Souza, T.A., Sugano, J.Y., Rodriguez, D.Z.: Novos modelos de negócios e a economia compartilhada: impactos e desafios para a indústria tradicional de automóveis. XX Seminários em Administração - Semead PPGA/FEA/USP. Proceedings of..., 17 p. https://semead.com.br/20/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/11/programacao_v8.pdf (2017)
Li, X., Tang, J., Hu, X., Wang, W.: Assessing intercity multimodal choice behavior in a Touristy City: a factor analysis. J. Transp. Geogr. 86, 102776 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102776
Lin, J.H., Lee, T.R., Jen, W.: Assessing asymmetric response effect of behavioral intention to service quality in an integrated psychological decision-making process model of intercity bus passengers: a case of Taiwan. Transportation 35(1), 129–144 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9139-3
Matzler, K., Sauerwein, E.: The factor structure of customer satisfaction: An empirical test of the importance grid and the penalty‐reward‐contrast analysis. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Man. 13(4), 314–332 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230210445078
Meier, J., Thomas, N.. Collaboratively We Share, But Differently We Care: The impact of the Brazilian and German culture on the social drivers of sharing economy participation. Jönköping International Business School. (2018). https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1211989/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Mensah, I.K., Tianyu, Z., Zeng, G., Chuanyong, L.: Determinants of the continued intention of college students in China to use DiDi mobile car-sharing services. SAGE Open 9(4), 1–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019893697
Mikulic, J., Prebežac, D.: A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model. Manag. Serv. Quality Int. J. 21(1), 46–66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111100243
Minett, P., Pearce, J.: Estimating the energy consumption impact of casual carpooling. Energies 4(1), 126–139 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3390/en4010126
Mitropoulos, L., Kortsari, A., Ayfantopoulou, G.: A systematic literature review of ride-sharing platforms, user factors and barriers. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 13, 1–22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00522-1
Möhlmann, M.: Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. J. Consum. Behav. 14(3), 193–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1512
Montero, J. J.: Regulating transport platforms: the case of carpooling in Europe. In: The governance of smart transportation systems (pp. 13-35). Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96526-0_2
Morton, C., Caulfield, B.M., Anable, J.: Customer perceptions of quality of service in public transport: Evidence for bus transit in Scotland. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 4(3), 199–207 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2016.03.002
Naveen, B.R., Gurtoo, A.: The cause effect relationship model of service quality in relation with overall satisfaction. Transp. Res. Proced. 48, 1694–1721 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.208
Nicholson, A.: Transport network reliability measurement and analysis. Transports 11(2), 49–62 (2003). https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v11i2.148
Novaes, A.G., Silveira, S.F., Medeiros, H.C.: Efficiency and productivity analysis of the interstate bus transportation industry in Brazil. Pesqui. Oper. 30, 465–485 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-74382010000200012
Olorunniwo, F., Hsu, M.K., Udo, G.J.: Service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in the service factory. J. Serv. Mark. 20(1), 59–72 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040610646581
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: Servqual: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retail. 64(1), 12 (1988)
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L., Zeithaml, V.A.: Understanding customer expectations of service. Sloan Manag. Rev. 32, 39–48 (1991)
Petrick, J.F.: First timers’ and repeaters’ perceived value. J. Travel Res. 43(1), 29–38 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287504265509
Picolo, J.D., Tontini, G.: Penalty and reward contrast analysis (PRC): identifying improvement opportunities in a service. RAM. Revista De Adm. Mackenzie 9(5), 35–58 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-69712008000500003
Ponte, E.B., Carvajal-Trujillo, E., Escobar-Rodríguez, T.: Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents. Tour. Manage. 47, 286–302 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.009
Prieto, M., Baltas, G., Stan, V.: Car sharing adoption intention in urban areas: what are the key sociodemographic drivers? Transp. Res. Part a: Policy Pract. 101, 218–227 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.012
Radam, I.F., Kartadipura, R.H., Yuliana, C.: Passengers’ perception of service quality of intercity public transport: a banjarmasin case study. IOSR J. Mech. Civil Eng. IOSR-JMCE 11(6), 11–16 (2014). https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-11651116
Randheer, K., Al-Motawa, A.A., Vijay, P.J.: Measuring commuters’ perception on service quality using SERVQUAL in public transportation. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 3(1), 21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v3n1p21
Rohani, M.M., Wijeyesekera, D.C., Karim, A.T.A.: Bus operation, quality service and the role of bus provider and driver. Proced. Eng. 53, 167–178 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.022
Sanchez-Silva, M., Daniels, M., Lleras, G., Patino, D.: A transport network reliability model for the efficient assignment of resources. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 39(1), 47–63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.03.002
Schor, J.: Debating the sharing economy. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 4(3), 7–22 (2016)
Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., Sabol, B.: Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J. Mark. 66(1), 15–37 (2002)
Sorratini, J.A., Liu, R., Sinha, S.: Assessing bus transport reliability using micro-simulation. Transp. Plan. Technol. 31(3), 303–324 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060802086512
Soza-Parra, J., Raveau, S., Muñoz, J.C., Cats, O.: The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 126, 83–93 (2019)
Spalenza, A.S., Ramalho, F.R.X., Rigo, A.S.: O compartilhamento de carros: um ensaio teórico sobre a adequação de organizações no contexto de sustentabilidade em que se insere a economia do compartilhamento. XX Seminários em Administração - Semead PPGA/FEA/USP. Proceedings of, 17 p. https://semead.com.br/20/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/11/programacao_v8.pdf (2017)
Stemler, A.: Betwixt and between: regulating the shared economy. Fordham Urban Law J. 43(1), 31 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2535656
Tontini, G., Solberg Søilen, K., Zanchett, R.: Nonlinear antecedents of customer satisfaction and loyalty in third-party logistics services. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 5, 1116–1135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2016-0173
Van Lierop, D., El-Geneidy, A.: Enjoying loyalty: the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Res. Transp. Econ. 59, 50–59 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.001
Wakata, M., Takahashi, K., Okada, Y.: A study on a structure of customers’ mental images on the safety in railroad services–an evaluation of safety management in transportation bureau from the viewpoint of customers’ satisfaction/comfort/safety. Proced. Manuf. 3, 4294–4301 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.420
Wang, S.M., Feng, C.M., Hsieh, C.H.: Stakeholder perspective on urban transport system service quality. Total Qual. Manag. 21(11), 1103–1119 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.529329
Wang, Y., Gu, J., Wang, S., Wang, J.: Understanding consumers’ willingness to use ride-sharing services: the roles of perceived value and perceived risk. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 105, 504–519 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.044
Wang, Y., Wang, S., Wang, J., Wei, J., Wang, C.: An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model. Transportation 47(1), 397–415 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9893-4
Wen, C.H., Lan, L.W., Cheng, H.L.: Structural equation modeling to determine passenger loyalty toward intercity bus services. Transp. Res. Rec. 1927(1), 249–255 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3141/1927-28
Woodside, A.G., Frey, L.L., Daly, R.T.: Linking service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention. J. Health Care Mark. 9(4), 5–17 (1989)
Wu, X., Cao, J., Huting, J.: Using three-factor theory to identify improvement priorities for express and local bus services: an application of regression with dummy variables in the Twin Cities. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 113, 184–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.003
Wu, X., Cao, X.J., Ding, C.: Exploring rider satisfaction with arterial BRT: an application of impact asymmetry analysis. Travel Behav. Soc. 19, 82–89 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.12.006
Yang, S., Song, Y., Chen, S., Xia, X.: Why are customers loyal in sharing-economy services? A relational benefits perspective. J. Serv. Mark. 31(1), 48–62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2016-0042
Zeithaml, V.A.: Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 52(3), 2–22 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
Funding
This work was supported by the CNPq – Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa, Brazil (Research Productivity Grant—PQ2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GT was responsible for the research planning, advising about data analysis, and the final writing of the paper. The other authors were responsible for the literature review and the field research. Prof. Tontini was the head of the project and the other authors were participants in studies related to nonlinear methods of research about customer satisfaction.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tontini, G., de Souza Mazato, É., Ferretti, P.C. et al. Factors influencing intention to use ridesharing or intercity bus services: a nonlinear point of View. Transportation (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-023-10399-9
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-023-10399-9