Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Image isn’t everything: Personality attractiveness, physical attractiveness, and self-employment earnings

  • Research article
  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complementing studies on physical attractiveness and labor market outcomes, we use the information on physical and personality attractiveness rated by interviewers from four waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (ADD Health) for 1,485 individuals (73 female and 60 male self-employed). Though neither physical attractiveness nor personality attractiveness is related to self-employment earnings individually, females who are self-employed with both physical attractiveness and personality attractiveness have higher earnings. There are no effects of both attractiveness types for males (employed or self-employed) or females (employed) on earnings.

Plain English Summary

We examine how physical attractiveness and personality attractiveness relate to performance in self-employment. Interestingly, we did not find that either physical attractiveness or personality attractiveness individually had any significant relationship with earnings for self-employed individuals. However, we did find that self-employed females who are both physically attractive and have attractive personalities did have significantly higher earnings. There were no significant effects on earning for either self-employed or employed males who were both physically attractive and had attractive personalities or for employed females with both forms of attractiveness. These results add nuance to prior research regarding the potential beauty premium that could play a role in key aspects of performance for those who are self-employed. Specifically, our findings highlight the need to consider both physical and personality traits for females who are considering, or are currently pursuing, self-employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The industry codes are based on the Census Bureau’s 2012 classification and available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/guidance/industry-occupation/census-2012-final-code-list.xls

References

  • Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (pp. 1–181). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, Y. A., Muqaddam, A., & Miller, S. (2021). The effects of the visual presentation of an Influencer's Extroversion on perceived credibility and purchase intentions—moderated by personality matching with the audience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., Markman, G. D., & Bollinger, M. (2006). Exporting social psychology: Effects of attractiveness on perceptions of entrepreneurs, their ideas for new products, and their financial success. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 467–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00015.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauldry, S., Shanahan, M. J., Russo, R., Roberts, B. W., & Damian, R. (2016). Attractiveness compensates for low status background in the prediction of educational attainment. PloS One, 11(6), e0155313.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beaujean, A. A., Firmin, M. W., Attai, S., Johnson, C. B., Firmin, R. L., & Mena, K. E. (2011). Using personality and cognitive ability to predict academic achievement in a young adult sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6), 709–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B., & Brush, C. (2002). A gendered perspective on organizational creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3), 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. W., Huang, L., Kearney, S. W., & Murray, F. E. (2014). Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men (10.1073/pnas.1321202111). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(12), 4427. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/12/4427.abstract

  • Burke, A. E., FitzRoy, F. R., & Nolan, M. A. (2002). Self-employment wealth and job creation: The roles of gender, non-pecuniary motivation and entrepreneurial ability (journal article). Small Business Economics, 19(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019698607772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürkner, P.-C., & Vuorre, M. (2019). Ordinal regression models in psychology: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaker, N. N., Walker, D., Nowlin, E. L., & Anaza, N. A. (2019). When and how does sales manager physical attractiveness impact credibility: A test of two competing hypotheses. Journal of Business Research, 105, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2014). The unnatural selection of male entrepreneurs. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 2–4.

  • Chitra, K., & Ramya Sreedevi, V. (2011). Does personality traits influence the choice of investment? IUP Journal of Behavioral Finance, 8(2).

  • Doorley, K., & Sierminska, E. (2015). Myth or fact? The beauty premium across the wage distribution in Germany. Economics Letters, 129, 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, J., Siegel, S., & Young, L. (2012). Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(8), 2455–2484. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M. (2004). Is it still worth to be credible? A meta-analysis of temporal patterns of source credibility effects in marketing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M. (2006). Source credibility dimensions in marketing communication–A generalized solution. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 10(2).

  • Fallan, L., & Opstad, L. (2014). Beyond gender performance in accounting: Does personality distinction matter? Accounting Education, 23(4), 343–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E., & Reuber, R. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unfamiliar: The challenges of reputation formation facing new firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G., Kuratko, D. F., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017). Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T., Robins, P. K., Homer, J. F., & Tapsell, L. M. (2009). Effects of physical attractiveness, personality, and grooming on academic performance in high school. Labour Economics, 16(4), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruhen, L. S., Watkins, C. D., & Jones, B. C. (2015). Perceptions of facial dominance, trustworthiness and attractiveness predict managerial pay awards in experimental tasks. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugère, M. A., Escoto, C., Cousins, A. J., Riggs, M. L., & Kumashiro, M. (2015). Perceptions of physical attractiveness and personality as predictors of romantic partner selection. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garaika, G., Margahana, H. M., & Negara, S. T. (2019). Self efficacy, self personality and self confidence on entrepreneurial intention: study on young enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gindling, T., Mossaad, N., & Newhouse, D. (2016). Earnings premiums and penalties for self-employment and informal employees around the world. The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gindling, T., Mossaad, N., & Newhouse, D. (2020). Self-employment earnings premiums/penalties and regulations: evidence from developing economies. Small Business Economics, 55(2), 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hachana, R., Berraies, S., & Ftiti, Z. (2018). Identifying personality traits associated with entrepreneurial success: does gender matter? Journal of Innovation Economics Management, 3, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, D. S. (2011). Beauty pays: Why attractive people are more successful. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M., & Hotz, V. J. (2021). 'National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) Parent Study: Public Use, [United States], 2015-2017. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-08-10. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37375.v4'

  • Hmieleski, K. M., & Sheppard, L. D. (2019). The Yin and Yang of entrepreneurship: Gender differences in the importance of communal and agentic characteristics for entrepreneurs' subjective well-being and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(4), 709–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion.

  • Hundley, G. (2001). Why women earn less than men in self-employment. Journal of Labor Research, 22(4), 817–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. A., Stevenson, R. M., & Letwin, C. R. (2018). A woman’s place is in the… startup! Crowdfunder judgments, implicit bias, and the stereotype content model. Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.003

  • Johnson, S. K., Podratz, K. E., Dipboye, R. L., & Gibbons, E. (2010). Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the “Beauty is Beastly” effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Hurst, C., & Simon, L. S. (2009). Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1149–1179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangasharju, A., & Pekkala, S. (2002). The role of education in self–employment success in Finland. Growth and Change, 33(2), 216–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, K. M., Schinka, J. A., & Curtiss, G. (2004). Person-environment congruence and personality domains in the prediction of job performance and work quality. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(2), 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Fisher, G., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017). The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, D. (2006). The male/female earnings gap and female self-employment. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(5), 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. B., Wilson, D. W., & Haig, W. L. (2014). A picture is worth a thousand words: Source credibility theory qpplied to logo and website design for heightened credibility and consumer trust. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30(1), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.839899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, C., & St-Jean, É. (2013). Entrepreneurial personality: The role of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 527–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matz, S. C., Kosinski, M., Nave, G., & Stillwell, D. J. (2017). Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12714–12719.

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J. E., & Peterson, M. (2019). The long-term impact of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial orientation on venture performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 720–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobius, M. M., & Rosenblat, T. S. (2006). Why beauty matters. American Economic Review, 96(1), 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mocan, N., & Tekin, E. (2010). Ugly criminals. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk, E. P., Jr. (2016). The consequences of “race and color” in Brazil. Social Problems, 63(3), 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnieks, C. Y., Sudek, R., & Wiltbank, R. (2015). The role of personality in angel investing. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1050–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, K. M., & Gladstone, E. (2018). Beauty and social capital: Being attractive shapes social networks. Social Networks, 52, 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obschonka, M., & Stuetzer, M. (2017). Integrating psychological approaches to entrepreneurship: the Entrepreneurial Personality System (EPS). Small Business Economics, 49(1), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9821-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. C., & Wolfe, M. T. (2019). In the eye of the beholder? The returns to beauty and IQ for the self-employed. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1323

  • Patel, P. C., & Wolfe, M. T. (2021). In the eye of the beholder? The returns to beauty and IQ for the self-employed. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(4), 487–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patzer, G. L. (1983). Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness. Journal of Business Research, 11(2), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. The Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (2002). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, C. J., & Kaynama, S. (2012). The impact of personality typ and gender on students’ performance in a business capstone course. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 16(1), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, J. K., & Sicinski, K. (2015). Facial attractiveness and lifetime earnings: Evidence from a cohort study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 14–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, U., Tavares, S. M., Carvalho, H., Ramalho, J. J., Santos, S. C., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2020). Self-employment and eudaimonic well-being: Energized by meaning, enabled by societal legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6), 106047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, M. L., & Neil Macrae, C. (2004). Is beautiful always good? Implicit benefits of facial attractiveness. Social Cognition, 22(6), 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, M. T., & Patel, P. C. (2016). Grit and self-employment: A multi-country study. Small Business Economics, 47(4), 853–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, M. T., & Patel, P. C. (2017). Instant gratification: temporal discounting and self-employment. Small Business Economics, 48(4), 861–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1497–1517.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Kong, F., Zhong, Y., & Kou, H. (2014). Personality manipulations: Do they modulate facial attractiveness ratings? Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 80–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 259–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. (2007). How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 70–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus T. Wolfe.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolfe, M.T., Patel, P.C. Image isn’t everything: Personality attractiveness, physical attractiveness, and self-employment earnings. Small Bus Econ 62, 807–831 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00784-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00784-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation