Abstract
While there are studies regarding the neural correlates of human facial attractiveness, there are few investigations considering neural responses for body form attractiveness. The most prominent physical feature defining men’s attractiveness is their physical fitness and upper body strength. Shoulder-to-hip ratio (SHR), a sexually dimorphic trait in humans, is an indicator of men’s attractiveness for both men and women. The current study is the first to report on the neurophysiological responses to male and female body forms varying in SHR in healthy heterosexual men and women observers. Electroencephalographic (EEG) signals were acquired while participants completed an oddball task as well as a subsequent attractiveness judgement task. Behavioral results showed larger SHRs were considered more attractive than smaller SHRs, regardless of stimuli and participants’ sex. The electrophysiological results for both the oddball task and the explicit judgement of attractiveness showed that brain activity related to male SHR body stimuli differed depending on the specific ratios, both at early and late processing stages. For female avatars, SHR did not modulate neural activity. Collectively the data implicate posterior brain regions in the perception of body forms that differ in attractiveness vis-a-vis variation of SHR, and frontal brain regions when such perceptions are rated explicitly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Authors will share upon request.
References
Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 16(5), 395–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2
Bertoquini, V., & Pais-Ribeiro, J. (2006). Estudo de formas reduzidas do NEO-PI-R: Exame do NeoFFI, do Neo–FFI-R, e do Neo FFI-P para o contexto português. Psicologia: Teoria, Investigação e Prática, 11, 85–102.
Bovet, J., & Raymond, M. (2015). Preferred women’s waist-to-hip ratio variation over the last 2500 years. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0123284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123284
Braun, M. F., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506068264
Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2005). A narrow waist versus broad shoulders: Sex and age differences in the jealousy-evoking characteristics of a rival’s body build. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.020
Calvo, M. G., Gutiérrez-García, A., & Beltrán, D. (2018). Neural time course and brain sources of facial attractiveness vs. trustworthiness judgment. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18, 1233–1247. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0634-0
Canavarro, M. C. (1999). Inventário de sintomas psicopatológicos: BSI. In M. R. Simões, M. Gonçalves, & L. S. Almeida (Eds.), Testes e provas psicológicas em Portugal (Vol. 2, pp. 87–109). SHO/APPORT.
Cloutier, J., Heatherton, T. F., Whalen, P. J., & Kelley, W. M. (2008). Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(6), 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20062
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2
Critchley, H., Daly, E., Phillips, M., Brammer, M., Bullmore, E., Williams, S., Van Amelsvoort, T., Robertson, D., David, A., & Murphy, D. (2000). Explicit and implicit neural mechanisms for processing of social information from facial expressions: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Human Brain Mapping, 9(2), 93–105.
Del Zotto, M., & Pegna, A. J. (2017). Electrophysiological evidence of perceived sexual attractiveness for human female bodies varying in waist-to-hip ratio. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(3), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-017-0498-8
Derogatis, L. R. (1993). BSI: Brief Symptom Inventory (3rd ed.). National Computers Systems.
Di Dio, C., Macaluso, E., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). The golden beauty: Brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS ONE, 2(11), e1201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001201
Dien, J. (1998). Addressing misallocation of variance in principal components analysis of event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 11(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022218503558
Dien, J., Beal, D. J., & Berg, P. (2005). Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: Matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(8), 1808–1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.11.025
Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021889228469
Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Ormsby, D. K., & Dixson, A. F. (2014). Eye-tracking women’s preferences for men’s somatotypes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.10.003
Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293(5539), 2470–2473. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063414
Durkee, P. K., Goetz, A. T., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (2018). Formidability assessment mechanisms: Examining their speed and automaticity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.006
Durkee, P. K., Polo, P., Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., Rodríguez-Ruiz, C., Losada-Pérez, M., Fernández-Martínez, A. B., Turiégano, E., Buss, D. M., & Pita, M. (2019). Men’s bodily attractiveness: Muscles as fitness indicators. Evolutionary Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919852918
Fan, J., Dai, W., Liu, F., & Wu, J. (2005). Visual perception of male body attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272(1560), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2922
Frederick, D. A., Buchanan, G. M., Sadehgi-Azar, L., Peplau, L. A., Haselton, M. G., Berezovskaya, A., & Lipinski, R. E. (2007). Desiring the muscular ideal: Men’s body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.8.2.103
Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303022
Freeman, J., Ziemba, C. M., Heeger, D. J., Simoncelli, E. P., & Movshon, J. A. (2013). A functional and perceptual signature of the second visual area in primates. Nature Neuroscience, 16(7), 974–981. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3402
Fuchs, M., Kastner, J., Wagner, M., Hawes, S., & Ebersole, J. S. (2002). A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(5), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00030-5
Garza, R., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2021). Effects of women’s short-term mating orientation and self-perceived attractiveness in rating and viewing men’s waist to chest ratios. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50, 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01846-0
Garza, R., Heredia, R. R., & Cieślicka, A. B. (2017). An eye tracking examination of men’s attractiveness by conceptive risk women. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1474704917690741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917690741
Gliga, T., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2005). Structural encoding of body and face in human infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1328–1340. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929055002481
Graffar, M. (1956). Une méthode de classification sociale d’échantillons de population. Courrier, 6(8), 455–459.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55(4), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9
Gray, P. B., & Frederick, D. A. (2012). Body image and body type preferences in St. Kitts, Caribbean: A cross-cultural comparison with US samples regarding attitudes towards muscularity, body fat, and breast size. Evolutionary Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000319
Grezes, J., Pichon, S., & De Gelder, B. (2007). Perceiving fear in dynamic body expressions. NeuroImage, 35(2), 959–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.030
Hahn, A. C., Symons, L. A., Kredel, T., Hanson, K., Hodgson, L., Schiavone, L., & Jantzen, K. J. (2016). Early and late event-related potentials are modulated by infant and adult faces of high and low attractiveness. Social Neuroscience, 11(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1059361
Hamm, J. P., Johnson, B. W., & Kirk, I. J. (2002). Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(8), 1339–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00161-X
Hegdé, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (2000). Selectivity for complex shapes in primate visual area V2. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(5), RC61. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.20-05-j0001.2000
Hegdé, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (2004). Temporal dynamics of shape analysis in macaque visual area V2. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92(5), 3030–3042. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00822.2003
Holliday, I. E., Longe, O. A., Thai, N. J., Hancock, P. J., & Tovée, M. J. (2011). BMI not WHR modulates BOLD fMRI responses in a sub-cortical reward network when participants judge the attractiveness of human female bodies. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e27255. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027255
Hönekopp, J., Rudolph, U., Beier, L., Liebert, A., & Müller, C. (2007). Physical attractiveness of face and body as indicators of physical fitness in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.001
Horvath, T. (1981). Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542671
Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00149-6
Kordsmeyer, T. L., Hunt, J., Puts, D. A., Ostner, J., & Penke, L. (2018). The relative importance of intra-and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.008
Kret, M. E., Pichon, S., Grèzes, J., & de Gelder, B. (2011). Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI Study. NeuroImage, 54(2), 1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.012
Martín-Loeches, M., Hernández-Tamames, J. A., Martín, A., & Urrutia, M. (2014). Beauty and ugliness in the bodies and faces of others: An fMRI study of person esthetic judgement. Neuroscience, 277, 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.040
Massar, K., & Buunk, A. P. (2009). Rivals in the mind’s eye: Jealous responses after subliminal exposure to body shapes. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.016
Mazziotta, J., Toga, A., Evans, A., Fox, P., Lancaster, J., Zilles, K., Woods, R., Paus, T., Simpson, G., Pike, B., & Holmes, C. (2001). A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 356, 1293–1322. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0915
Nichols, T. E., & Holmes, A. P. (2002). Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Human Brain Mapping, 15(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.1058
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Pascual-Marqui, R. D. (1999). Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem. International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism, 1(1), 75–86.
Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M., & Lehmann, D. (1994). Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(84)90014-X
Pazhoohi, F., & Liddle, J. R. (2012). Identifying feminine and masculine ranges for waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(2), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099212
Pazhoohi, F., Hosseinchari, M., & Doyle, J. F. (2012). Iranian men’s waist-to-hip ratios, shoulder-to-hip ratios, body esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1556/jep.10.2012.2.2
Pazhoohi, F., Garza, R., Doyle, J. F., Macedo, A. F., & Arantes, J. (2019). Sex differences for preferences of shoulder to hip ratio in men and women: An eye tracking study. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00198-w
Pazhoohi, F., Arantes, J., Kingstone, A., & Pinal, D. (2020a). Becoming sexy: Contrapposto pose increases attractiveness ratings and modulates observers’ brain activity. Biological Psychology, 151, 107842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107842
Pazhoohi, F., Arantes, J., Kingstone, A., & Pinal, D. (2020b). Waist to hip ratio and breast size modulate the processing of female body silhouettes: An EEG study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.01.001
Pazhoohi, F., Hassan, S. B., & Kingstone, A. (2023a). The interacting effects of men’s height and shoulder-to-hip ratio on comfort distance: A virtual reality study. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-023-00216-z
Pazhoohi, F., Garza, R., & Kingstone, A. (2023b). The interacting effects of height and shoulder-to-hip ratio on perceptions of attractiveness, masculinity, and fighting ability: Experimental design and ecological validity considerations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(1), 301–314.
Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2005). Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93(1), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00513.2004s
Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2007). The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(8), 636. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2195
Platek, S. M., Krill, A. L., & Wilson, B. (2009). Implicit trustworthiness ratings of self-resembling faces activate brain centers involved in reward. Neuropsychologia, 47(1), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.018
Platek, S. M., & Singh, D. (2010). Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men. PLoS ONE, 5(2), e9042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009042
Pourtois, G., Peelen, M. V., Spinelli, L., Seeck, M., & Vuilleumier, P. (2007). Direct intracranial recording of body-selective responses in human extrastriate visual cortex. Neuropsychologia, 45(11), 2621–2625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.04.005
Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005
Puts, D. A., Welling, L. L., Burriss, R. P., & Dawood, K. (2012). Men’s masculinity and attractiveness predict their female partners’ reported orgasm frequency and timing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.03.003
Rupp, H. A., James, T. W., Ketterson, E. D., Sengelaub, D. R., Janssen, E., & Heiman, J. R. (2009). Neural activation in women in response to masculinized male faces: Mediation by hormones and psychosexual factors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.08.006
Schwarzlose, R. F., Baker, C. I., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(47), 11055–11059. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2621-05.2005
Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., Von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584.
Sell, A., Hone, L. S., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23, 30–44.
Sell, A., Lukazsweski, A. W., & Townsley, M. (2017). Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men’s bodily attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1869), 20171819. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819
Shen, H., Chau, D. K., Su, J., Zeng, L. L., Jiang, W., He, J., Fan, J., & Hu, D. (2016). Brain responses to facial attractiveness induced by facial proportions: Evidence from an fMRI study. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 35905. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35905
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293
Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(75)90263-1
Suzuki, K., Yamadori, A., & Fuji, T. (1997). Category-specific comprehension deficit restricted to body parts. Neurocase, 3(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554799708404054
Taylor, J. C., Wiggett, A. J., & Downing, P. E. (2007). fMRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(3), 1626–1633. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00012.2007
Thierry, G., Pegna, A. J., Dodds, C., Roberts, M., Basan, S., & Downing, P. (2006). An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body. NeuroImage, 32(2), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.060
Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Vale, E. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. The Lancet, 353(9163), 1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00438-9
Triarhou, L. C. (2007). A proposed number system for the 107 cortical areas of Economo and Koskinas, and Brodmann area correlations. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 85(5), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1159/000103259
Trujillo, L. T., Jankowitsch, J. M., & Langlois, J. H. (2014). Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: A neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(3), 1061–1076. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0230-2
Vartanian, O., Goel, V., Lam, E., Fisher, M., & Granic, J. (2013). Middle temporal gyrus encodes individual differences in perceived facial attractiveness. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031591
Weiner, K. S., & Grill-Spector, K. (2013). Neural representations of faces and limbs neighbor in human high-level visual cortex: Evidence for a new organization principle. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 77(1), 74–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0392-x
Zhang, Y., Kong, F., Chen, H., Jackson, T., Han, L., Meng, J., Yang, Z., Gao, J., & Najam ul Hasan, A. (2011). Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: An event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 89(11), 1887–1893. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22724
Zhang, Z., & Deng, Z. (2012). Gender, facial attractiveness, and early and late event-related potential components. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 11(04), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219635212500306
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted at Psychology Research Centre (UID/PSI/01662/2013), University of Minho, and supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education through national funds and co-financed by FEDER through COMPETE2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007653). JA receives funding from FCT Portugal through grants PTDC/MHC-PCN/4589/2012 and IF/01298/2014 and DP is supported by grant SFRH/BPD/120111/2016.
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This research was approved by the Behavioural Research Ethics Committee of the University of Minho and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki as it pertains to research with human participants.
Informed Consent
All participants consented to taking part in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pazhoohi, F., Arantes, J., Kingstone, A. et al. Neural Correlates and Perceived Attractiveness of Male and Female Shoulder-to-Hip Ratio in Men and Women: An EEG Study. Arch Sex Behav 52, 2123–2141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02610-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02610-w