Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk and Protective Factors of Juvenile Justice Involvement among Post-Adjudicated Young Women

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study utilizes the risk and resilience framework to understand the risk and protective correlates of moderate to high levels of juvenile justice involvement among post-adjudicated young women (N = 365). This exploratory model-building method utilized cross-sectional administrative data collected through the Positive Achievement Change Tool. The analysis yielded the best model using five social history factors, including the age at the time of probation, involvement in structured activities, running away from home, mental health history, and antisocial attitudes and behaviors. Results revealed that those with a history of mental health problems or running away from home had higher odds of having a high level of juvenile justice involvement compared with a lower level of involvement. Moreover, younger women were more likely to have moderate or high levels of juvenile justice involvement than a low level of involvement. Interventions should focus on holistically addressing individual, family, and community factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not available.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Aalsma, M., Brown, J., Holloway, E., & Ott, M. (2014). Connection to mental health care upon community reentry for detained youth: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, V. R., & Walerych, B. M. (2019). Contextualizing the nature of trauma in the Juvenile justice trajectories of girls. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 47(2), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2019.1582141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A. (2006). Enhancing adherence to risk-need-responsivity: Making quality a matter of policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(3), 595–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annamma, S. A., Anyon, Y., Joseph, N. M., Farrar, J., Greer, E., Downing, B., & Simmons, J. (2019). Black girls and school discipline: The complexities of being overrepresented and understudied. Urban Education, 54(2), 211–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916646610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, E. K., Alter, C. F., & Jenson, J. M. (2009). Development of a risk and resilience-based out-of-school time program for children and youths. Social Work, 54(1), 45–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M. T. (2009). The assessment of risk to recidivate among a juvenile offending population. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 596–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M. T., & Jackowski, K. (2013). Examining the validity of a juvenile offending risk assessment instrument across gender and race/ethnicity. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(1), 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M. T., Jackowski, K., Greenwald, M. A., & Howell, J. C. (2014). Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders: A statewide analysis of prevalence and prediction of subsequent recidivism using risk and protective factors. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(1), 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M. T., & Wolff, K. T. (2019). Predicting juvenile re-entry success: Developing a global risk score and risk classification levels using the residential positive achievement change tool. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 17(3), 241–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M. T., Wolff, K. T., Piquero, A. R., Howell, J. C., & Greenwald, M. A. (2017). Risk assessment trajectories of youth during juvenile justice residential placement: Examining risk, promotive, and “buffer” scores. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(3), 360–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnoski, R. (2004). Assessing risk for re-offence: Validating the Washington state juvenile court assessment. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. 1–49. Retrieved https://www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/869

  • Barnoski, R. (2009). Positive achievement change tool, pre-screen instrument. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D. E., Ju, S., Katsiyannis, A., & Zhang, D. (2015). Females in the juvenile justice system: Influences on delinquency and recidivism. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(2), 427–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, B. S., Ryan, N. J., Didericksen, K. W., Daniels, M., & Glosson, K. (2021). Confronting racism and bias within early intervention: The responsibility of systems and individuals to influence change and advance equity. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121421992470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, C. L., Kohl, P. L., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2014). Females in the juvenile justice system: Who are they and how do they fare? Crime & Delinquency, 60(1), 106–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, W.H. (2021) Los Angeles county: youth justice reimagined, recommendations of the Los Angeles county youth justice work group. Haywood burns institute: Los Angeles. Retrieved https://lacyouthjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Youth-Justice-Reimagined-1.pdf

  • Butts, J. A., Bazemore, G., & Meroe, A. S. (2010). Positive Youth Justice—Framing Justice Interventions Using the Concepts of Positive Youth Development. DC Coalition for Juvenile Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauffman, E. (2008). Understanding the female offender. The Future of Children, 18(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cauffman, E., Beardslee, J., Fine, A., Frick, P., & Steinberg, L. (2021). Crossroads in juvenile justice: The impact of initial processing decision on youth 5 years after first arrest. Development and Psychopathology, 33(2), 700–713. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457942000200X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R., Briones, R., Gulledge, L., Karas, L., Winters, K. C., Belenko, S., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2012). Stress, mental health, and substance abuse problems in a sample of diversion program youths: An exploratory latent class analysis. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 21, 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1067828X.2012.662115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Development Services Group, Inc. (2017). Diversion Programs: Literature review. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Diversion_Programs.pdf.

  • Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (2006). The development and ecology of antisocial behavior. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 503–541). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, E. M., Sorensen, J. R., & Walfield, S. (2020). Youth pathways: Evaluating the influence of gender, involvement with the public mental health system, perceived mental health need, and traumatic experiences on juvenile justice system processing. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18(3), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, J., Hawes, J., & Bhinder, B. (2020). Incarcerated girls, Criminal pathways and multiple forms of abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 35, 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00122-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D., Chapman, J., Mack, J. M., & Pearson, G. (2006). Pathways from traumatic child victimization to delinquency: Implications for juvenile and permanency court proceedings and decisions. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 57(1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, M. W., Richman, J. M., & Galinsky, M. J. (1999a). Risk, protection, and resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research, 23(3), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, M. W., Richman, J. M., & Galinsky, M. J. (1999b). Risk, protection, and resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research, 23(3), 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaarder, E., Rodriguez, N., & Zatz, M. S. (2004). Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers' views of girls. Justice Quarterly, 21(3), 547–578.

  • Haynie, D. L., Giordano, P. G., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2005). Adolescent romantic relationships and delinquency involvement. Criminology, 43(1), 177–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, K. D., Ford, J. D., Mahoney, K., Ko, S. J., & Siegfried, C. B. (2004). Trauma among girls in the juvenile justice system. Los Angeles, CA: National Child Traumatic Stress Network.

  • Herringa, R. J., Birn, R. M., Ruttle, P. L., Burghy, C. A., Stodola, D. E., Davidson, R. J., & Essex, M. J. (2013). Childhood maltreatment is associated with altered fear circuitry and increased internalizing symptoms by late adolescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(47), 19119–19124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, R. D. (2002). Standardized instruments for assessing risk and need in youthful offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 380–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). Wiley-Interscience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2002). A meta-analysis of the predictors of delinquency among girls. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(3), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huzinga, D., Miller, S., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Group. (2009). Developmental sequences of girls' delinquent behavior. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/grants/242663.pdf

  • Huizinga, D., Miller, S., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Group. (2013). Girls study group: Developmental sequences of girls' delinquent behavior. OJJDP. https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh176/files/pubs/238276.pdf

  • Javdani, S., & Allen, N. E. (2016). An ecological model for intervention for juvenile justice-involved girls: Development and preliminary prospective evaluation. Feminist Criminology, 11(2), 135–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javdani, S., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2011). Gendered social forces: An examination of the impact of the justice systems’ response on women and girls’ criminal trajectories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 161–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmar, J. M., Tossone, K., Butcher, F., & Marsh, B. (2018). Examining the impact of a juvenile justice diversion program for youth with behavioral health concerns on early adulthood recidivism. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.010

  • Lederman, C. S., Dakof, G. A., Larrea, M. A., & Li, H. (2004). Characteristics of adolescent females in juvenile detention. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27(4), 321–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S., & Taxman, F. S. (2020). Using latent class analysis to identify the complex needs of youth on probation. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Lee, D. K. (2018). What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test? Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 71(5), 353–360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leve, L. D., & Chamberlain, P. (2004). Female juvenile offenders: Defining an early-onset pathway for delinquency. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 13(4), 439–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leve, L. D., Chamberlain, P., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Risks, outcomes, and evidence-based interventions for girls in the US juvenile justice system. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 18(3), 252–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-015-0186-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. H. (2012). Predicting risk to re-offend: Establishing the validity of the positive achievement change tool (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3458&context=etd

  • Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19(3), 921–930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, N. C., & Anderson, V. R. (2021). Diminishing returns? Threshold effects of dispositions and recidivism among court-involved girls. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(11), 1557–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S. E. (2021). How are they different? An exploration of family and school factors among post-adjudicated young women. Women & Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1973941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickey, R. M., & Greenland, S. (1989). The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 129(1), 125–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E., Gaskin, C., & Indig, D. (2013). Childhood maltreatment and post-traumatic stress disorder among incarcerated young offenders. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(10), 861–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2013). Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach. In: R. J. B. Committee on Assessing Juvenile Justice Reform, Robert L. Johnson, Betty M. Chemers, and Julie A. Schuck, (Ed.) Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (Eds.). National Academies Press

  • Neumeister, A., Henry, S., & Krystal, J. H. (2007). Neurocircuitry and neuroplasticity in PTSD. In M. J. Friedman, T. M. Keane, & P. A. Resick (Eds.), Handbook of PTSD: Science and practice (pp. 151–165). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OJJDP. (2019). Young women and the juvenile justice system. Retrieved https://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/251486.pdf

  • OJJDP. (2020). The Decline in Arrests of Juveniles Continued Through 2019. Retrieved https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/snapshots/DataSnapshot_UCR2019.pdf

  • Olsson, C. A., Bond, L., Burns, J. M., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Sawyer, S. M. (2003). Adolescent resilience: A concept analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 26(1), 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, E. J., & Weinstein, R. S. (2004). Urban adolescents’ exposure to community violence: The role of support, school safety, and social constraints in a school-based sample of boys and girls. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 33, 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3303_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish. (2020). Achieving justice for girls in the juvenile justice system. Social Work, 65, 149–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, D., Thompson, R., Negi, N., & Alquicira, L. (2020). A national survey of probation staff of the needs, services and barriers of female youth in juvenile justice settings. Women & Criminal Justice, 31(6), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2020.1813236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puzzanchera, C. & Ehrmann, S. (2018). Spotlight on girls in the juvenile justice system. OJJDP Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [Online report]. Retrieved https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/snapshots/DataSnapshot_GIRLS2015.pdf

  • Roe-Sepowitz, D. E. (2009). Comparing male and female juveniles charged with homicide: Child maltreatment, substance abuse, and crime details. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11411152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saewyc, E. M., & Edinburgh, L. D. (2010). Restoring healthy developmental trajectories for sexually exploited young runaway girls: Fostering protective factors and reducing risk behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46(2), 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scales, P. C., & Leffert, N. (2004). Developmental assets: A synthesis of the scientific research on adolescent development (2nd ed.) Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute

  • Seigle, E., Walsh, N., & Weber, J. (2014). Core principles for reducing recidivism and improving other outcomes for youth in the juvenile justice system. Council of State Government Justice Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shader, M. (2003). Risk factors for delinquency: An overview. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/frd030127.pdf

  • Simmons-Horton, S., & Gibson, C. (2019). Girls and the school-to-prison pipeline. In F. Bernat & K. Frailing (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Women and Crime. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118929803.ewac0243

  • Smith, D. K., & Saldana, L. (2013). Trauma, delinquency, and substance use: Co-occurring problems for adolescent girls in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 22(5), 450–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B. J. (2008). Other-sex friendship involvement among delinquent adolescent females. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204005282313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Development Review, 28, 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stice, E., Ragan, J., & Randall, P. (2004). Prospective relations between social support and depression: Differential direction of effects for parent and peer support? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.113.1.155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S., & Caudy, M. S. (2015). Risk tells us who, but not what or how: Empirical assessment of the complexity of criminogenic needs to inform correctional programming. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(1), 71–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., McClelland, G. M., Dulcan, M. K., & Mericle, A. A. (2002). Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(12), 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.12.1133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., McClelland, G. M., Washburn, J. J., & Pikus, A. K. (2005). Detecting mental disorder in juvenile detainees: Who receives services. American Journal of Public Health, 95(10), 1773–1780.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Texas Care for Children. (2020). We must combat these racial disparities facing TX kids and families. https://txchildren.org/posts/2020/6/19/we-must-combat-these-racial-disparities-facing-tx-kids-and-families

  • Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., & Grisso, T. (2012). Risk assessment in juvenile justice: A guidebook for implementation. Chicago, IL: John T. and Catherine D. MacArthur Foundation.

  • Vincent, G. M. (2012). Screening and assessment in juvenile justice systems: Identifying mental health needs and risk of re-offending. Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. C., Bishop, A. S., Nurius, P. S., & Logan-Greene, P. (2016). The heterogeneity of treatment needs for justice-involved girls: A typology using latent class analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815615162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (2002). Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct.

  • Wasserman, G. A., McReynolds, L. S., Schwalbe, C. S., Keating, J. M., & Jones, S. A. (2010). Psychiatric disorder, comorbidity, and suicidal behavior in juvenile justice youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(12), 1361–1376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810382751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch-Brewer, C. (2018). Risk-need profiles of serious and chronic female juvenile offenders: Implications for female juvenile correctional programming. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(9), 2742–2758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Washington State Juvenile Court (WSJCA) (2004). Assessment Manual Version 2.1. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/873/Wsipp_Washington-State-Juvenile-Court-Assessment-Manual-Version-2-1_Report.pdf

  • Zahn, M. A., Agnew, R., Fishbein, D., Miller, S., Winn, D. M., Dakoff, G., & Chesney-Lind,M. (2010). Causes and correlates of girls' delinquency. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. NCJ226358.

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the Tan Ean Kiam Postgraduate Scholarship award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors had an active contribution to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujeeta Elizabeth Menon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

IRB approval was granted for use of the dataset. Permission to reproduce material from other sources: Not permitted due to restricted nature.

Research Involving Human Participants

This research complies with international, national and/or institutional standards on research involving human participants and/or animals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menon, S.E., Parrish, D. & Zhao, Q. Risk and Protective Factors of Juvenile Justice Involvement among Post-Adjudicated Young Women. Child Adolesc Soc Work J (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-023-00925-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-023-00925-0

Keywords

Navigation