Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:10:30.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Landholding Inequality and the Consolidation of Democracy: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2023

Adrien Montalbo
Adrien Montalbo*
Affiliation:
Post-doctoral Researcher, IESEG School of Management, Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Economie Management, F-59000 Lille, France.
*
E-mail: montalboadrien@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I investigate the effect of landholding inequalities on the democratization process in nineteenth-century France. I focus on the 1849 election, which followed the establishment of the Second Republic (1848–1851), and on the first six elections of the Third Republic (1870–1940), which took place between 1876 and 1893. I find that stronger landholding inequalities were associated to a lower support for the Republicans, and therefore constituted a threat to the consolidation of democracy. I provide evidence that large landowners resisted the establishment of democracy by influencing the electoral behavior of economically dependent agricultural workers.

Type
Article
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , March 2023 , pp. 203 - 241
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Thomas Baudin, Tat-Kei Lai, Simone Moriconi, Juan S. Muñoz, and participants to the 2021 Royal Economic Society Annual Conference, the 2021 Economics and Business History Society Conference, the 69th Congress of the French Economic Association, the Western Economic Association International 96th Annual Conference, the 33rd Annual European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy Conference, and the 7th Annual Meeting of the Danish Society for Economic and Social History for their very helpful comments. A very special thanks to Frédéric Salmon, who accepted to share his data on the electoral outcomes of the 1849 election.

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A., and Yared, Pierre. “Income and Democracy.” American Economic Review 98, no. 3 (2008): 808–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A., and Yared, Pierre “Reevaluating the Modernization Hypothesis.” Journal of Monetary Economics 56, no. 8 (2009): 1043–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. “Why Did the West Extend the Franchise? Democracy, Inequality, and Growth in Historical Perspective.” Quarterly Journal of Economic 115, no. 4 (2000): 1167–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. “A Theory of Political Transitions.” American Economic Review 91, no. 4 (2001): 938–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agulhon, Maurice. 1848 ou l’apprentissage de la République: 1848–1852. Paris, France: Points Histoire. Éditions du Seuil, 2016.Google Scholar
Aidt, Toke S., Daunton, Martin, and Dutta, Jayasri. “The Retrenchment Hypothesis and the Extension of the Franchise in England and Wales. Economic Journal 120, no. 547 (2010): 990–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aidt, Toke S., Dutta, Jayasri, and Loukoianova, Elena. “Democracy Comes to Europe: Franchise Extension and Fiscal Outcomes 1830–1938.” European Economic Review 50, no. 2 (2006): 249–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aidt, Toke S., and Franck, Raphaël. “Democratization under the Threat of Revolution: Evidence from the Great Reform Act of 1832.” Econometrica 83, no. 2 (2015): 505–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aidt, Toke S., and Franck, Raphaël “What Motivates an Oligarchic Elite to Democratize? Evidence from the Roll Call Vote on the Great Reform Act of 1832.” Journal of Economic History 79, no. 3 (2019): 773–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Siwan, Francois, Patrick, and Kotwal, Ashok. “Clientelism in Indian Villages.” American Economic Review 105, no. 6 (2015): 1780–816.Google Scholar
Ansell, Ben, and Samuels, David. “Inequality and Democratization: A Contractarian Approach.” Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 12 (2010): 1543–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avenel, Henri. Comment vote la France: dix-huit ans de suffrage universel, 1876–1893. Paris, France: Librairies-imprimeries réunies, 1894.Google Scholar
Baland, Jean-Marie, and Robinson, James A.. “Land and Power: Theory and Evidence from Chile.” American Economic Review 98, no. 5 (2008): 1737–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J. “Determinants of Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 107, no. S6 (1999): S158–S183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beltran, Alain, and Griset, Pascal. La croissance économique de la France: 1815–1914. Collection Cursus: Série Histoire. Paris, France: Armand Colin, 1994.Google Scholar
Berger, Helge, and Spoerer, Mark. “Economic Crises and the European Revolutions of 1848.” Journal of Economic History 61, no. 2 (2001): 293–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Charles, and Stokes, Susan C.. “Endogenous Democratization.” World Politics 55, no. 4 (2003): 517–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouillon, Jacques. “Les démocrates-socialistes aux élections de 1849.” Revue française de science politique 6e année 1 (1956): 70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bound, John, Jaeger, David A., and Baker, Regina M.. “Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogeneous Explanatory Variable Is Weak.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, no. 430 (1995): 443–50.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand, and Labrousse, Ernest. Histoire économique et sociale de la France, t.III, 1789–1880. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France, 1976.Google Scholar
Brückner, Markus, and Ciccone, Antonio. “Rain and the Democratic Window of Opportunity.” Econometrica 79, no. 3 (2011): 923–47.Google Scholar
Burke, Paul J., and Leigh, Andrew. “Do Output Contractions Trigger Democratic Change?” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2, no. 4 (2010): 124–57.Google Scholar
Cinnirella, Francesco, and Hornung, Erik. “Landownership Concentration and the Expansion of Education.” Journal of Development Economics 121 (2016): 135–52.Google Scholar
Conley, John P., and Temimi, Akram. “Endogenous Enfranchisement When Groups’ Preferences Conflict.” Journal of Political Economy 109, no. 1 (2001): 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, Aditya, and Ziblatt, Daniel. “How Did Britain Democratize? Views from the Sovereign Bond Market.” Journal of Economic History 75, no. 1 (2015): 1–29.Google Scholar
Delefortrie, Nicole, and Morice, Janine. Les revenus départementaux en 1864 et en 1954. Paris, France: Armand Colin, 1959.Google Scholar
Demonet, Michel. Tableau de l’agriculture française au milieu du 19e siècle : l’enquête de 1852. Paris, France: Ecoles des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 1990.Google Scholar
Duby, George, and Wallon, Armand. Histoire de la France rurale. 3. De 1789 à 1914. Paris, France: Editions du Seuil, 1976.Google Scholar
de Castries, Duc. Le Testament de la Monarchie. Tome V, Le grand refus du comte de Chambord. Paris, France: Hachette, 1970.Google Scholar
Easterly, William. “Inequality Does Cause Underdevelopment: Insights from a New Instrument.” Journal of Development Economics 84, no. 2 (2007): 755–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L., and Sokoloff, Kenneth L.. “The Evolution of Suffrage Institutions in the New World.” Journal of Economic History 65, no. 4 (2005): 891–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, Theresa, Franck, Raphaël, and Johnson, Noel D.. “The Effects of Land Redistribution: Evidence from the French Revolution.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP14522, Washington, DC, March 2020.Google Scholar
Flechey, E. “Les dommages directs causés par l’invasion allemande.” Journal de la société statistique de Paris tome 18 (1877): 265–70.Google Scholar
Franck, Raphaël. “The Political Consequences of Income Shocks: Explaining the Consolidation of Democracy in France.” Review of Economics and Statistics 98, no. 1 (2016): 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Raphaël, and Michalopoulos, Stelios. “Emigration during the French Revolution: Consequences in the Short and Longue Durée.” NBER Working Paper No. 23936, Cambridge, MA, October 2017.Google Scholar
Garrigou, Alain. Le vote et la vertu: Comment les Français sont devenus électeurs. Paris, France: Presses de Sciences Po, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. Bread and Democracy in Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Goguel, François. Géographie des élections françaises: de 1870 à 1951. Paris, France: Armand Colin, 1951.Google Scholar
Gooch, Elizabeth. “Terrain Ruggedness and Limits of Political Repression: Evidence from China’s Great Leap Forward and Famine (1959–61).” Journal of Comparative Economics 7, no. 4 (2019): 827–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, Donald. The Incidence of the Emigration during the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Hanson, Stephen. “The Founding of the French Third Republic.” Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 8-9 (2010): 1023–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, Christian. “Inequality and Democracy: Why Inequality Harms Consolidation but Does Not Affect Democratization.” World Politics 61, no. 4 (2009): 589–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. “Democracy’s Third Wave.” Journal of Democracy 2, no. 2 (1991): 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Morgan. “The Standard Errors of Persistence.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 13783, Washington, DC, July 2019.Google Scholar
Krieckhaus, Jonathan, Son, Byunghwan, Mukherjee Bellinger, Nisha, and Wells, Jason M.. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Support.” Journal of Politics 76, no. 1 (2013): 139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacroix, Jean. “Steam Democracy Up! Industrialization-Led Opposition in Napoleonic Plebiscites.” European Review of Economic History 22, no. 2 (2017): 135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land Process Distributed Active Archive Center. Global 30 Arc-Second Elevation Data Set GTOPO30, 2004.Google Scholar
Lavisse, Ernest, and Seignobos, C.. Histoire de France contemporaine: Depuis la Révolution jusqu’à la paix de 1919. La révolution de 1848, vol. 6. Paris, France: Hachette, 1920.Google Scholar
Lignereux, Aurélien. La France rébellionnaire. Les résistances à la gendarmerie (1800–1859). Rennes, France: Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53, no. 1 (1959): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizzeri, Alessando, and Persico, Nicola. “Why Did the Elites Extend the Suffrage? Democracy and the Scope of Government, with an Application to Britain’s ‘Age of Reform’.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, no. 2 (2004): 707–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayeur, Jean-Marie. Les débuts de la Troisième République, 1871–1898. Paris, France: Points Histoire. Éditions du Seuil, 1973.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89, no. 5 (1981): 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montalbo, Adrien. “Schools without a Law: Primary Education in France from the Revolution to the Guizot Law.” Explorations in Economic History 79 (2021): 101364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montalbo, Adrien. “Landholding Inequality and the Consolidation of Democracy: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century France.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-01-13. https://doi.org/10.3886/E159361V1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidu, Suresh. “Suffrage, Schooling, and Sorting in the Post-Bellum U.S. South.” NBER Working Paper No. 18129, Cambridge, MA, June 2012.Google Scholar
Nogales, A., Archondo-Callao, Rodrigo, and Bhandari, A.. Road Cost Knowledge System. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2002.Google Scholar
Nunn, Nathan, and Puga, Diego. “Ruggedness: The Blessing of Bad Geography in Africa.” Review of Economics and Statistics 94, no. 1 (2012): 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Jose A., and Limongi, Fernando. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Shawn J., Degloria, Stephen D., and Elliot, Robert. “A Terrain Ruggedness Index that Quantifies Topographic Heterogeneity.” Intermountain Journal of Science 5, no. 1-4 (1999): 23–7.Google Scholar
Salmon, Frédéric. Atlas électoral de la France 1848–2001. Paris, France: Éditions du Seuil, 2001.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Yale Agrarian Studies Series. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Seghezza, Elena, and Morelli, Pierluigi. “Suffrage Extension, Social Identity, and Redistribution: The Case of the Second Reform Act.” European Review of Economic History 23, no. 1 (2018): 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegfried, André. Tableau Politique de la France de l’Ouest sous la Troisième République. Paris, France: Armand Colin, 1913.Google Scholar
Squicciarini, Mara P. “Devotion and Development: Religiosity, Education, and Economic Progress in Nineteenth-Century France.” American Economic Review 110, no. 11 (2020): 3454–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tackett, Timothy. Religion, Revolution, and Regional Culture in Eighteenth-Century France: The Ecclesiastical Oath of 1791. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Zambrano, Raul. “Violent Events in France, 1830–1860 and 1930–1960.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2006-1-12. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR09080.v1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Alwyn. “Consistency without Inference: Instrumental Variables in Practical Application.” European Economic Review 147 (2022): 104112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Arthur. Voyages en France pendant les années 1787-88-89 et 90. Paris: Buisson, 1794.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. “Does Landholding Inequality Block Democratization?: A Test of the ‘Bread and Democracy’ Thesis and the Case of Prussia.” World Politics 60, no. 4 (2008): 610–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar